UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )
Filed by the Registrant [ X ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ]    Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ]    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ X ]    Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ]    Definitive Additional Materials
[ ]    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ X ]    No fee required.
[ ]    Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)    Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)    Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)March 12, 2015Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)    Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)    Total fee paid:
[ ]    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)    Amount Previously Paid:
(2)    Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)    Filing Party:
(4)    Date Filed:





swmfinalproxystatemen_image1.jpg
March 17, 2017
TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:

On behalf of the Board of Directors and management of Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., I cordially invite you to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Thursday, April 23, 201520, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time at the Company’s corporate headquarters located at 100 North Point Center East, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia.

Details about the Annual Meeting, nominees for election to the Board of Directors and other matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting are presented in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement that follow.

It is important that your stock be represented at the meeting regardless of the number of shares you hold. You are encouraged to specify your voting preferences by so marking and dating the enclosed proxy card. But, ifIf you wish to vote in accordance with the directors’Board’s recommendations, all you need to do is sign and date the card. You may also vote over the Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

Please complete and return the proxy card in the enclosed envelope or vote over the Internet whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.Annual Meeting. If you do attend and wish to vote in person, you may do so by revoking your proxy at that time.

If you plan to attend the meeting,Annual Meeting, please check the card in the space provided. This will assist us with meeting preparations and will enable us to expedite your admittance. If your shares are not registered in your own name and you would like to attend the meeting,Annual Meeting, please ask the broker, bank or other nominee which holds the shares to provide you with evidence of your share ownership, which will enable you to gain admission to the meeting.

Annual Meeting.
Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,

signature1a01.jpg

Frédéric Villoutreix
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer















SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
100 North Point Center East, Suite 600
Alpharetta, Georgia 30022-8246


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

April 23, 2015


March 17, 2017
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. will be held at the Company’s corporate headquarters located at 100 North Point Center East, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia, on Thursday, April 23, 201520, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time for the following purposes:
1.To elect the three nominees for director named in the attached proxy statement for terms expiring at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
2.To approve the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
3.To ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2015; and2017;
3.To hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve executive compensation;
4.To hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the frequency of the advisory vote regarding executive compensation; and
5.To transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
We currently are not aware of any other business to be brought before the Annual Meeting.

You may vote all shares that you owned as of February 26, 2015,23, 2017, which is the record date for the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock must be represented either in person or by proxy to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business. Your vote is important. I urge you to sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed business reply envelope. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. You may also vote over the Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

Sincerely,
Sincerely,signature2a01.jpg
Ricardo Nuñez
Interim General Counsel and Secretary

Greerson G. McMullen
General Counsel and Secretary

March 12, 2015Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 20, 2017. Our Proxy Statement and the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available online at our Investor Relations website at http://www.swmintl.com/.




3










TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
PROXY STATEMENT
1
STOCK OWNERSHIP
4
Significant Beneficial Owners
4
Directors and Executive Officers
STOCK OWNERSHIP
5
 
Significant Beneficial Owners
5
Directors and Executive Officers
5
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
6
PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
7
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL ONE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
138
 
Compensation Discussion & Analysis
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
1314
 
Compensation Committee Report
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
2114
COMPENSATION TABLESCOMMITTEE REPORT
2225
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
3542
PROPOSAL TWO – APPROVAL OF 2015 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
39
PROPOSAL THREE –TWO RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
47
 
Information Regarding the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
47
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
49
OTHER INFORMATION
PROPOSAL THREE NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
50
 
PROPOSAL FOUR NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
51
OTHER INFORMATION
52
Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20162018 Annual Meeting
5052
 
Form 10-K,
Annual Report on Form 10‑K and Proxy Statement
5052
 
Communicating with the Board
50
APPENDIX A – SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2015 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
5152














SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
100 North Point Center East, Suite 600
Alpharetta, Georgia 30022-8246

PROXY STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are being furnished to the stockholders of Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, referred to as either the “Company” or “SWM,” in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) for use at the 20152017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The Company intends to mail this Proxy Statement and proxy card, together with the 20142016 Annual Report to Stockholders, on or about March 12, 2015.

17, 2017.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

When and Where is the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be held on April 23, 2015,20, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time, at our principal executive office located at 100 North Point Center East, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022.

What is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the matters listed in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including (i) the election ofto elect three directors for terms expiring in 2018,2020; (ii)  the approval of our 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan and (iii) the ratification ofto ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2015.

2017; (iii) to hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve executive compensation; (iv) to hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the frequency of the advisory vote regarding executive compensation; and (v) to consider and act upon the stockholder proposal described in this Proxy Statement if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
We currently are not aware of any business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than that described in this Proxy Statement. If, however, other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, your proxy includes discretionary authority on the part of the individuals appointed to vote your shares to act on those matters according to their best judgment.

Adjournment of the Annual Meeting may be made for the purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional proxies.proxies to obtain a quorum. Any adjournment may be made from time to time by the chairman of the Annual Meeting.

Who MayAttend the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders of record at the close of business on February 26, 2015,23, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting, or their duly appointed proxies may attend the Annual Meeting. Although we encourage you to complete and return the attached proxy card by mail or vote over the Internet to ensure your vote is counted, you may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.

What Constitutes a Quorum for Purposes of the Annual Meeting?

Pursuant to Section 216 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and the Company’s By-Laws, aA quorum for the Annual Meeting will be a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Common Stock”), present in person or represented by proxy. Abstentions and “broker non-votes”non‑votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.


1


Who is Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting?

Each stockholder of record at the close of business on February 26, 2015,23, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting, will be entitled to one vote for each share registered in such stockholder’s name. As of February 26, 2015,23, 2017, there were 30,526,89130,594,547 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

Participants in the Company’s Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) may vote the number of shares they hold in that plan. The number of shares shown on a participant’s proxy card includes the stock units you holdthe participant holds in the Plan and serves as a voting instruction to the trustee of the Plan for the account in the participant’s name. Information as to the voting instructions given by individuals who are participants in the Plan will not be disclosed to the Company.





1

How May I Vote My Shares?

You can vote by completing, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Proxy cards received at the Company’s principal executive office prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted as instructed. You may also vote over the Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card or vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in “street name” (through(i.e., if they are held through a broker, bank or other nominee), you may receive a separate voting instruction form with this Proxy Statement, or you may need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote electronically by using the Internet or by telephone. If your shares are held in “street name” and you wish to vote in person, you must obtain a legal proxy from the record holder (the broker, bank or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

If your vote is received before the Annual Meeting, the named proxies will vote your shares as you direct.

How Does the Board Recommend that I Vote?

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote:
FOR the three nominees for election to the Board named in Proposal One – Election of Directors;
▪
FOR the three nominees for election to the Board named in Proposal One – Election of Directors;
FOR Proposal Two – Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;
FOR Proposal Three – Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation; and
FOR a frequency of every THREE YEARS on Proposal Four – Non-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve the Frequency of the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.
▪
FOR Proposal Two – Approval of the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
▪
FOR Proposal Three – Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

What Vote is Required to Approve Each Proposal?

Proposal One – Election of Directors. Directors will be elected by a plurality vote of shares of SWM’s Common Stock as of the record date present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. This means that the individuals who receive the greatest number of votes cast “FOR” will be elected as directors, up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement. Votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from each nominee; votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect.

Proposal Two – ApprovalRatification of the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive PlanSelection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The vote will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of the Common Stock as of the record date present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter is required to approve Proposal Two.matter.

Proposal Three – Ratification of the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmNon-Binding Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. The vote will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of shares of the Common Stock as of the record date present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject mattermatter. This is requiredan advisory vote and is not binding on the Board of

2


Directors. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future decisions regarding executive compensation.
Proposal Four – Non-Binding Advisory Vote To Approve the Frequency of the Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. The vote shall be decided by the affirmative vote of a plurality of shares of the Common Stock as of the record date present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter. A “plurality” for Proposal Four means the choice of frequency that receives the greatest number of votes cast will be considered the preference of our stockholders. This is an advisory vote and is not binding on the Board of Directors. However, our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes to approve Proposal Three.executive compensation.

What Happens if I Do Not Vote My Shares?

We encourage you to vote. Voting is an important stockholder right and we encourage you to do so. It is also important that you votehelps to establish a quorum for the conduct of business. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. In tabulating the voting result for any particular proposal, abstentions and, if applicable, broker non-votes are not counted as votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposals. Accordingly, abstentions will have no effect on Proposal One, since only votes “FOR” a director nominee will be considered in determining the outcome.outcome and, similarly, will have no effect on Proposal Four regarding the non-binding advisory vote to approve the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation. Because they are considered to be present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining voting results, abstentions will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the other proposals.

Proposals Two and Three.
Under the New York Stock Exchange ("the NYSE"(“NYSE”) rules, if your shares are held in “street name” and you do not indicate how you wish to vote, your broker is permitted to exercise its discretion to vote your shares only on certain “routine” matters. Proposal ThreeTwo is a “routine” matter under NYSE rules and, as such, your broker is permitted to exercise discretionary voting authority to vote your shares “FOR” or “AGAINST” the proposal in the absence of your instruction. The other proposals are not considered “routine” matters. Accordingly, if you do not direct your broker how to vote on such proposals, your broker may not exercise discretionary voting authority and may not vote your shares. This is called a “broker non-vote”non-vote,” and although your shares will be considered to be represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and counted for quorum purposes as discussed above, they are not considered to be shares “entitled to vote” at the Annual Meetingon those proposals and will not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal.

proposals. Therefore, they will not have the effect of a vote for or against such proposals.
How Can I Revoke My Proxy or Change My Vote?

AnyAt any time before it is voted, any proxy may be revoked by the stockholder grantingwho granted it at any time before it is voted by (i) delivering to the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary another signed proxy card or a signed document revoking the earlier proxy or by(ii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. You may also change your previously-submitted vote by submitting a subsequent vote over the Internet. The last vote received prior to the Annual Meeting will be the one counted.

2


If your shares are held in “street name” (through(i.e., if they are held through a broker, bank or other nominee), you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. YouAt any time before your previously-submitted vote or previously-granted proxy is voted, you may also change yoursuch vote or revoke yoursuch proxy in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from the record holder (the broker, bank or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.

Who Pays For the Proxy Solicitation?

The Company will pay the entire cost of the proxy solicitation. The Company has retained American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the Company’s transfer agent, to aid in the solicitation of proxies. Proxy solicitation services on routine proxy matters, including each of the three proposals listed in this Proxy Statement, are included in the fees paid to American Stock Transfer & Trust Company to act as the Company’s stock transfer agent and registrar. Only reasonable out-of-pocket expenses on proxy solicitation services are charged separately. The Company will reimburse brokers, fiduciaries and other nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors, officers and employees of the Company will not receive any additional compensation in connection with such solicitation.

3


Who Will Count the Vote?

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company has been engaged to tabulate stockholder votes and act as our independent inspector of election for the Annual Meeting.



34


STOCK OWNERSHIP

Significant Beneficial Owners

The following table shows the persons known to the Company as of February 26, 2015March 2, 2017 to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In furnishing the information below, the Company has relied solely on information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) by the beneficial owners.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class* Sole Voting Power Shared Voting Power Sole Investment Power Shared Investment Power
             
Royce & Associates, LLC(1)
745 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151
 

4,341,245
 

14.25%
 

4,341,245
 

0
 

4,341,245
 

0
             
BlackRock Inc.(2)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
 

2,711,386
 

8.9%
 

2,643,837
 

0
 

2,711,386
 

0
             
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(3)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 1935
 

2,004,917
 

6.58%
 

43,390
 

0
 

1,964,527
 

40,390
             
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(4)
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
 

1,787,339
 

5.8%
 

232,979
 

0
 

1,787,339
 

0
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of Class* Sole Voting Power Shared Voting Power Sole Investment Power Shared Investment Power
             
BlackRock Inc.(1)
            
55 East 52nd Street 3,494,429 11.4% 3,427,326 0 3,494,429 0
New York, NY 10022            
             
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2)
            
100 Vanguard Blvd. 2,721,860 8.91% 40,946 4,260 2,678,273 43,587
Malvern, PA 19355            
             
LSV Asset Management (3)
 1,592,749 5.22% 944,576 0 1,592,749 0
155 N. Wacker Drive Suite 4600            
Chicago, IL 60606            

* The percentages contained in this column are based solely on information provided in Schedules 13G (or amendments thereto) filed with the SEC by each of the beneficial owners listed above regarding their respective holdings of the Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2014.2016.
________________________
(1)
Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A13G filed on January 21, 2015 by Royce & Associates, LLC (“Royce”) to report its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2014. Various accounts managed by Royce have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of shares of Common Stock. The interest of one account, Royce Special Equity Fund, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and managed by Royce, amounted to 2,300,000 shares or 7.55% of the total shares outstanding.
(2)
Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 22, 201517, 2017 by BlackRock Inc. to report its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2014.Stock.
(3)
(2)		Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 10, 201513, 2017 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) to report its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2014. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 42,733 shares or 0.13% of the Common Stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 800 shares or 0.00% of the Common Stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.Stock.
(4)
(3)		Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on February 12, 20156, 2017 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.LSV Asset Management to report its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2014.
Stock.


4



Directors and Executive Officers

To assure that the interests of directors and executive officers are aligned with the Company’s stockholders, the Company requires both directors and key executive officers (including all of the Company’s Named Executive Officers)Officers, as described in the section entitled “Executive Compensation - Compensation Discussion & Analysis”) to own minimum amounts of Common Stock.Stock within five years of becoming subject to the policy. Either directly or through deferred compensation accounts, each director must hold equity, or equity equivalents, in an amount at least equal in value to five times the value of the directors’ annual Board cash retainer. Each Named Executive Officer must hold equity (vested or unvested) equal to a multiple (from two to five), depending on the position held, of his or her annual base salary. DirectorsAs of March 2, 2017, all directors and key executive officers mustNamed Executive Officers have met or, within the applicable period, are expected to meet, these requirements by February 2017 or within five years of becoming subject to the policy, whichever is later.

stock ownership guidelines.
The following table sets forth information as of February 26, 2015March 2, 2017 regarding the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by all directors and nominees, by each Named Executive Officer and by all directors and executive officers as a group. In addition to shares of Common Stock they own beneficially, all directors have at some point deferred part of their compensation from the Company tothrough a deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors, explained in more detail under “Director Compensation” below. Under such plan, each director holds the equivalent of stock units in a deferral account. Unless otherwise indicated in a footnote, each person listed below possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned by that person.

5


The CompanyCompany’s insider trading policy prohibits directors and key executives (including all Named Executive Officers) from directly or indirectly hedging or pledging any of the Company’s equity securities. The policy also generally prohibits all officers, directors and employees of the Company (and its subsidiaries, independent contractors or consultants) from, among other things, engaging in short sales or transactions in publicly traded options, puts, calls or other derivative securities or from pledging a significant number ofbased on the Company’s equity securities.securities on an exchange or any other organized market. No shares listed in the table are pledged as security.
Name of Individual or Identity of GroupAmount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
Number of Deferred Stock Units (1)
Percent of Class (2)
    
Claire L. Arnold8,42047,278*
    
K.C. Caldabaugh4,00027,054*
    
Jeffrey A. Cook
  41,287(3)
0*
    
Stephen D. Dunmead
  46,650(4)
0*
    
Michel Fievez
107,732(5)
0*
    
William A. Finn15,2654,194*
    
Heinrich Fischer1,6590*
    
Greerson G. McMullen
   27,545(6)
0*
    
John D. Rogers
 2,004(7)
13,210*
    
Frédéric P. Villoutreix
407,566(8)
01.3%
    
Anderson D. Warlick5,21811,335*
    
All directors and executive officers as a group
667,346(9)
103,0712.2%

5


________Director and Director and Executive Officer Beneficial Ownership Table
Name of Individual or Identity of Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership 
Number of Deferred Stock Units (1)
 
Percent of Class(2)
       
Allison Aden 
25,048(3)
 0 *
       
Claire L. Arnold 11,054 54,148 *
       
K.C. Caldabaugh 4,000 33,570 *
       
Robert Cardin 
17,201(4)
 0 *
       
Michel Fievez 
73,720(5)
 0 *
       
William A. Finn 19,320 4,542 *
       
Heinrich Fischer 5,714 0 *
       
Jeffrey J. Keenan 0 4,864 *
       
Daniel Lister 
6,728(6)
 0 *
       
Marco Levi 0 0 *
       
Greerson G. McMullen 
0(7)
 0 *
       
Donald Meltzer 
652(8)
 0 *
       
John D. Rogers 2,004 18,538 *
       
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 
393,790(9)
 0 1.28%
       
Anderson D. Warlick 5,218 21,067 *
       
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) 
 564,449 0 1.84%
_______________
(1)
Represents the equivalent of stock units, including accumulated dividends, held in deferral accounts.
(2)
Percentages are calculated based on the basis of the amount of outstanding30,695,598 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on February 26, 2015, 30,526,891 shares,March 2, 2017, excluding shares held by or for the account of SWM or its subsidiaries, plus shares deemed outstanding pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d)(1). An asterisk shows ownership of less than 1% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding.
(3)
Includes 14,9332,119 shares of restricted stock that vested February 27, 2015; 1,806 shares24, 2017 (749 of restricted stock of which 903 shares vested February 26, 2015, of which 350 shares were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations, and 903 shares that will vest in February 2016; 14,258obligations); 19,564 shares of restricted stock that will also vest in February 20162018; 2,114 shares of restricted stock that will vest February 2019; and 1,6382,000 shares of restricted stock that will vest December 2019.

6


(4)Includes 433 shares of restricted stock that vested February 24, 2017 (168 of which were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations); 1,426 shares of restricted stock that vested February 25, 2017 (552 of which were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations); 3,994 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2017.2018; 6,000 shares of restricted stock that will vest August 2018; 431 shares of restricted stock that will vest February 2019; and 5,000 shares of restricted stock that will vest January 2020.
(4)
(5)		Includes 24,4871,446 shares of restricted stock that vested February 27, 2015; 3,552 shares of restricted stock of which 1,776 shares vested February 26, 2015, of which 625 shares were surrendered2016 but continued to fulfill tax obligations,have one year restriction on transfer and 1,776 shares that will vest in February 2016; 8,0832,038 shares of restricted stock that will vest invested February 2016; 2,929 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2017; and 10,000 shares of restricted stock that will vest in March 2017.
(5)
Includes 25,950 shares that vested on February 20, 2013,25, 2017 but continuedcontinue to have a two-year restriction on transfer which was lifted on February 20, 2015, 11,478 shares of restricted stock that vested on February 20, 2015 and 1,376 shares of restricted stock that vested on February 26, 2015.transfer. All vested shares include the power to vote such shares. Also includes 1,4461,026 shares of restricted stock that vested February 24, 2017; 4,517 shares of restricted stock that vested February 25, 2017, for which the two-year restriction on transferability was waived; 9,449 shares of restricted stock that will vest February 2018; and 996 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2016; and 2,0382019.
(6)Includes 524 shares of restricted stock that vested February 24, 2017 (199 of which were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations); 5,358 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2017; all2018; and 1,045 shares of which do not include the power to vote such shares andrestricted stock that will continue to have a two-year restriction on transfer following their respective vesting dates.vest February 2019.
(7)Mr. McMullen is no longer an employee of the Company. As of March 2, 2017, Mr. McMullen held no shares. All of Mr. McMullen’s unvested restricted stock was forfeited upon his departure from the Company.
(6)
(8)		Mr. Meltzer is no longer an employee of the Company. As of March 2, 2017, Mr. Meltzer held 652 shares. Includes 6,3561,064 shares of restricted stock that vested February 27, 2015; 1,230 shares24, 2017 (412 of restricted stock of which 615 shares vested February 26, 2015, of which 238 shares were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations, and 615obligations). 1,064 shares that will vest in February 2016; 2,798of Mr. Meltzer’s unvested restricted stock were forfeited upon his departure from the Company.
(9)Includes 8,317 shares of restricted stock that will also vest invested February 2016; 1,01424, 2017 (2,699 of which were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations); 36,553 shares of restricted stock that will vest invested February 2017; and 7,00025, 2017 (12,707 of which were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations); 76,791 shares of restricted stock that will vest in May 2017.
(7)
Mr. Rogers owns 2,004 shares jointly with his wife, Kyle E. Koehler.
(8)
Includes 67,511 shares of restricted stock that vested February 27, 2015; 8,162 shares of restricted stock of which 4,081 shares vested February 26, 2015, of which 1,349 shares were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations, 18,572 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2016;2018; and 6,7308,300 shares that will vest in February 2017.
(9)
Includes 316 shares of restricted stock of which 158 shares vested February 26, 2015, of which 62 shares were surrendered to fulfill tax obligations, and 884 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2016; and 263 shares of restricted stock that will vest in February 2017.2019.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports with the SEC regarding beneficial ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a).

Based solely on a review of copies of such reports filed with the SEC and written representations from the Company’s directors and executives that no other reports were required, the Company believes that all of its directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) applicable to them since January 1, 2014.2016.


67


PROPOSAL ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Number of Directors; Board Structure

SWM’s By-Laws provide that the number of directors on its Board shall be fixed by resolution of the Board from time to time and, until otherwise determined, shall not be less than six nor more than twelve. The Board presently has seveneight members. As indicated in the table below, theThe Board is divided into three classes of directors of the same or nearly the same number.

The table below shows the allocation of our directors, effective as of the date of the Annual Meeting, across these three classes:
Class I - Current Term EndingNominees for Election at 2017 Annual Meeting Class II - Current Term Ending at 20152018 Annual Meeting Class III -– Current Term Ending at 20162019 Annual Meeting
     
Claire L. Arnold William A. FinnK.C. Caldabaugh
Jeffrey J. KeenanJohn D. Rogers Frédéric P. Villoutreix
Heinrich Fischer William A. Finn
Marco Levi Anderson D. Warlick
John D. Rogers

Nominees for Director

Upon recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, the Board has nominated Ms. Claire L. Arnold and Messrs. K.C. Caldabaugh, William A. FinnJeffrey J. Keenan and John D. RogersMarco Levi for election to the Board as Class III directors to serve a three-year term ending at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Messrs. Caldabaugh, FinnAs previously disclosed, Mr. Fischer has informed the Board that he does not wish to stand for re-election due to competing time demands. Ms. Arnold and RogersMr. Keenan are all current members of the Board. Mr. Levi, who is not currently a director, was first identified as a potential nominee by a current director and, upon recommendation by the Nominating & Governance Committee, has been nominated by the Board and theas a director nominee.
The Board has determined that theyMs. Arnold and Messrs. Keenan and Levi are independent pursuant to the independence standards of the SEC, the NYSE and the Company. Each nominee for director has consented to serve if elected. Should the nominees become unable to serve, proxies may be voted for another person designated by the Board. Proxies can only be voted for the number of persons named as nominees in this Proxy Statement, which is three.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR the election to the Board of each of the three nominees for director.

Background Information on Nominees and Continuing Directors

The names of the nominees and the directors continuing in office, their ages as of the date of the Annual Meeting, their principal occupations and directorships during the past five years and certain other biographical information are set forth on the following pages.


78



Nominees For Election to the Board of Directors

Name Age Director Since Business Experience and Directorships
       
K.C. Caldabaugh 68 1995 
Principal of Heritage Capital Group, an investment banking firm, since 2001

William A. Finn 69 2008 
Chairman of AstenJohnson Holding Ltd., a holding company that has interests in paper machine clothing manufacturers, since 2006

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AstenJohnson, Inc., a paper machine clothing manufacturer, 1999 – 2006

John D. Rogers 53 2009 
Founding Partner of Jade River Capital Management, LLC since 2007

President and Chief Executive Officer of CFA Institute, an association of investment professionals, 2009 – 2014

President and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Institutional N.A., Senior Managing Director and Head of Worldwide Institutional Business, AMVESCAP Plc., a mutual fund company, 2003 – 2006

Director (and member of the Audit, Remuneration and Nominations and Governance Committees) of OM Asset Management plc. since 2014

Director of CFA Institute, 2009 – 2014



8



Name Age Director Since Business Experience and Directorships
       
Claire L. Arnold 70 1995 Chief Executive Officer of Leapfrog Services, Inc., since 1998
       
      Director of Ruby Tuesday, Inc., 1994 – 2012
       
Jeffrey J. Keenan 59 2016 Senior Advisor of Roark Capital Group, since 2015
       
      President and Chief Compliance Officer of Roark Capital Group, 2006 – 2015
       
      President of The United Company, 2002 – 2005
       
      Chairman of IESI Corporation, 1996 – 2005
       
Marco Levi 57   Entrepreneur, since 2016
       
      President and Chief Executive Officer, Ahlstrom Corporation, 2014 – 2016
       
      Senior Vice President and Business President of Emulsion Polymers, Styron Corporation, 2010 – 2014
       
      Global Business Unit Director, Elastomers-Synthetic Rubber-Specialty Packaging-Plastic Additives, The Dow Chemical Company, 2006 – 2010

Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in Office
Name Age Director Since Business Experience and Directorships
       
K.C. Caldabaugh 70 1995 Principal of Heritage Capital Group, since 2001
       
William A. Finn 71 2008 Chairman of AstenJohnson Holding Ltd., since 2006
       
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AstenJohnson, Inc., 1999 – 2006
       
John D. Rogers 55 2009 Founding Partner & Principal of Jade River Capital Management, LLC, 2007 – 2008
       
      President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of CFA Institute, 2009 ‑ 2014
       
      President and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Institutional N.A., Senior Managing Director and Head of Worldwide Institutional Business, AMVESCAP Plc, 2003 – 2006
       

9



Name Age Director Since Business Experience and Directorships
       
Claire L. Arnold 68 1995 Chief Executive Officer of Leapfrog Services, Inc., a computer support company and network integrator, since 1998
      Director – Ruby Tuesday, Inc., 1994 - 2012
       
Heinrich Fischer 65 2014 Founder, Co-owner and Chairman of Diamondscull AG, a company that invests in medical and environmental startups, since 2007
      Chief Executive Officer of SaurerGroup, 1986 - 2007
      Chairman of Orell Füssli AG since May 2012
      Director of Sensirion AG since August 2011
      Director of Hilti AG since 2007
      Director of Tecan AG since 2007
       
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 50 2007 
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of SWM, since 2009

Chief Operating Officer of SWM, 2006 – 2008

Vice President, Abrasives Europe and Coated Abrasives World, Compagnie de Saint-Gobain,
2004 – 2005
       
Anderson D. Warlick 57 2009 Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Parkdale, Inc. and its subsidiaries, a privately held textile and consumer products company since 2000


9


Frédéric P. Villoutreix 52 2007 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of SWM, since 2009
       
      Chief Operating Officer of SWM, 2006 – 2008
       
      Vice President, Abrasives Europe and Coated Abrasives World, Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, 2004 – 2005
       
Anderson D. Warlick 59 2009 Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Parkdale, Inc. and its subsidiaries, since 2000

Director Qualifications for Service on the Company’s Board

The particular experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board to conclude that each of the nominees for director and directors continuing in office should sit on the Board is summarized below:
Claire L. Arnold
Ms. Arnold has served as a director of five NYSE-listed small capitalization companies, including service as the chair of nominating & governance, compensation and audit committees, as well as lead director. As a member of the Company’s Board she has also served in the capacity of Lead Non-Management Director and currently serves as Chair of its Compensation Committee. Ms. Arnold’s broad experience on other boards and board committees allows her to provide substantial value and insight into best governance practices on such critical topics as executive compensation and governance. Ms. Arnold also contributes significant business experience as a member of the Board. From a business perspective, Ms. Arnold was the chief executive officer of a large, private distribution company for fifteen years, building it from $30 million in sales when acquired in a leveraged buy-out to $1.2 billion in sales through organic growth and through a series of strategic acquisitions. The company distributed tobacco products, among other things, giving Ms. Arnold direct insight into dealing with SWM’s major customers. Since 1998, Ms. Arnold has been the chief executive officer of Leapfrog Services Inc., a managed services company and network integrator. Her experience with information technology management systems has been directly relevant to an area in which the Company has made substantial capital investments. Her experience and background as a chief executive officer and service on public company audit committees also qualifies her as a financial expert. Ms. Arnold’s direct experience running a large enterprise, as well as her role in identifying, negotiating and managing the integration of acquisitions, makes Ms. Arnold a valuable asset to the Board in exercising its oversight and input on strategic planning.
Jeffrey J. Keenan
Mr. Keenan has extensive experience serving on private company boards. He has been a member of 29 boards of directors and is currently a member of two private company boards. He is a senior advisor at Roark Capital Group, a private equity fund with over $5 billion of capital under management. Previously, he was the president, chief operating officer and chief compliance officer of Roark Capital Group. In addition to his diverse experience with a variety of capital management firms, Mr. Keenan is also the former president of The United Company, a diversified private holding company with operations in energy, real estate, and financial services. Mr. Keenan has broadly-based business skills that will add value to the Board’s management of the Company, including strategic planning, financial and U.S. and international tax expertise as well as deep experience in multiple industries. Mr. Keenan has been appointed to the Company’s Audit Committee, where he is one of the Committee’s financial experts and serves on the Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Keenan was appointed to the Board as a Class I director by the Nominating & Governance Committee as of February 25, 2016, and was first identified and recommended as a nominee for election to the Board of Directors by a member of the Nominating & Governance Committee.
Marco Levi
Mr. Levi has over thirty years of experience in the chemicals, plastics and specialty paper and composites industries. His record of successfully running global materials technology businesses brings a proven leadership to the Board. As the former president and chief executive officer of Ahlstrom Corporation, a global high performance fiber

10


company, Mr. Levi understands the principles that create stockholder value and has successfully navigated many of the strategic challenges facing a publicly traded company. Prior to his service with Ahlstrom Corporation, Mr. Levi was the senior vice president and business president of Emulsion Polymers, Styron Corporation, a global chemical materials solutions provider. There, he led the Emulsion Polymers business through a successful initial public offering and was integral in overseeing core business functions including manufacturing, supply chain marketing, sales and research and development. If elected, the Board anticipates that Mr. Levi will serve as a member of the Nominating & Governance Committee.
K.C. Caldabaugh

Mr. Caldabaugh has served as the chief financial officer of publicly tradedpublicly-traded companies outside the paper industry and as the chief executive officer of a private company in the paper industry, including turnaround and distressed company situations. Subsequently, he has served as a principal inof The Heritage Group, an investment banking firm that provides strategic planning advice and that acts as an advisor in multi-faceted mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Caldabaugh’s background provides the Board with extensive experience related to the Company’s mergers, acquisitions and other strategic transactions, restructuring programs, evaluation and implementation of growth opportunities and strategic planning, in addition to his experience with financial controls and reporting.

As a member of the Company’s Board, Mr. Caldabaugh is the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee and has served several terms as SWM'sSWM’s Lead Non-Management Director. In addition, his experience as a chief financial officer provides experience directly relevant to his participation on the Company’s Audit Committee as one of the Committee’s financial experts.

William A. Finn

Mr. Finn has served on eight private company boards and is currently the chairman of two such boards and the vice chair of a third such board. He also has extensive experience with service on non-profit boards. He served as the chief executive officer of a paper machine clothing manufacturer with international production sites, including in China. His background as chief executive officer for 24 years of AstenJohnson, Inc., an international manufacturing enterprise and his board experience has given him deep familiarity with management, human resources, financial, sales and general administrative issues. His experience and perspective as an operator of a manufacturing enterprise and with operational and safety excellence initiatives implemented domestically and internationally is of particular relevance to the Board.

Mr. Finn also brings a wealth of experience relative to audit committee and compensation committee matters, having dealt with both throughout his career as chief executive officer of AstenJohnson and as a director on other company or non-profit boards. In these roles, he has dealt with chief financial officers, controllers, treasury, information technology, audit and cash management issues as well as the interaction with, and management of, independent outside auditors. He has also served on twothree compensation committees and a human resources committee. Presently, he is the chair of the audit committee for Seaman Corp. and the Trident United Way. Mr. Finn has served in the capacity of SWM'sSWM’s Lead Non-Management Director, on the Nominating & Governance Committee and isserves on the Compensation Committee and on the Audit Committee as one of the Audit Committee’s financial experts.

John D. Rogers

Mr. Rogers has extensive experience with large investment fund management firms, ranging from chief investment officer to president and chief executive officer. He served as president and chief executive officer of the CFA Institute, the world’s leading association of investment professionals, for five and a half years until June 2014. Mr. Rogers currently serves as a director and member of the audit, remuneration and nominations and governance committees of OM Asset Management plc., a global investment management firm. In addition, he has served for nine years on the boards of New York Stock Exchange-registeredNYSE-listed firms and as a director of multiple non-profit organizations. His chief executive officer experience and extensive experience in the investment management industry, including as an equity and fixed income investor and analyst, has equipped him with a range of skills that relate directly to identifying and driving the elements that create value and maximize the effective utilization of capital. Mr. Rogers is a CFA charterholder. His perspective enhances the Board’s ability to relate to and represent the interests of the Company’s stockholders. Mr. Rogers is one of our Audit Committee’s financial experts, and contributescontributing these skills as Chair of the Audit Committee.

Claire L. Arnold

Ms. Arnold has served as a director of five New York Stock Exchange-listed small capitalization companies, including service as the chair of nominating & governance, compensation and audit committees, as well as lead director. As a member of the Company's Board she has also served in the capacity of Lead Non-Management Director,Committee, and currently serves as Chair of its Compensation Committee. Ms. Arnold’s broad experience on other boards and board committees allows her to provide substantial value and insight into best governance practices on such critical topics as executive compensation and governance. From a business perspective, Ms. Arnold was the chief executive officer of a large, private distribution company for 15 years, building it from $30 million in sales when acquired in a leveraged buy-out to sales of $1.2 billion, accomplishing that equally through organic growth and through a series of acquisitions. The company distributed tobacco products, among other things, giving Ms. Arnold direct insight into dealing with SWM’s major customers. Ms. Arnold is currently the chief executive officer of Leapfrog Services Inc., a managed services company and network integrator. Her experience with information technology management systems has been directly relevant to an area in which the

10

Company has madesubstantial capital investments. Ms. Arnold’s direct experience running a large enterprise, as well as her role in identifying, negotiating, and managing the integration of acquisitions, makes Ms. Arnold a valuable asset to the Board in exercising its oversight and input on strategic planning.Company’s Lead Non-Management Director.

Heinrich Fischer
11

Mr. Fischer has extensive experience with service on boards of publicly-traded companies. In addition, he has extensive international experience, including a proven track record of successfully running manufacturing-oriented businesses on a global level, including in Asia. In addition, as a former chief executive officer and a founder and chairman of an investment company, he has broadly-based business skills, a solid understanding of the principles that create stockholder value and experience assisting companies as they navigate strategic challenges. He also has extensive experience with mergers and acquisitions. The experience he has acquired in these roles contributes to his service on the Company's Compensation Committee.

Frédéric P. Villoutreix

As current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Villoutreix brings a unified vision and depth of understanding of the operational, financial, and strategic elements of the Company to the Board. He also serves as the primary liaison between management and the Board as well as fillingand fills the core leadership role for both groups. His experience, both within the Company and in the various management positions and international assignments he held with his previous manufacturing-based employer, enhanced his ability to perform these functions.

Anderson D. Warlick

As the vice chairman and chief executive officer of Parkdale, Inc., a privately held textile and consumer products company that utilizes domestic and foreign manufacturing sites to produce and compete world-wide in primarily commodity product lines, Mr. Warlick brings experience to the Board in operational excellence, operating in less developed countries and effective management and deployment of fixed assets situated in different positions along the cost curve of competitive facilities. These skills and experience are directly related to developing and guiding the implementation of solutions to the Company’s current and strategic challenges.

Mr. Warlick also currently serves on the boards of three private corporations, one of which he serves as lead director, and is a member of their compensation and nominating & governance committees. He previously served as a director of an additional private company, including as the lead director and a member of the audit committee. The experience he acquired in these roles contributes to his service as the Company’s Lead Non-Management Director and on the Company’s Compensation and Nominating & Governance Committees.

Committees and previously as Lead Non-Management Director.
Nomination of Directors

Directors may be nominated by the Board or by stockholders in accordance with the By-Laws of the Company. The Nominating & Governance Committee, which is composed of three independent directors, identifies potential candidates and reviews all proposed nominees for the Board, including those proposed by stockholders. The Nominating & Governance Committee selects individuals as director nominees who have the highest personal and professional integrity and whose background and skills will enhance the Board’s ability to serve the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. The candidate review process includes an assessment of the person’s judgment, experience, financial expertise, independence, understanding of the Company’s business or other related industries, commitment and availability to prepare for and attend Board and Standing Committee meetings and such other factors as the Nominating & Governance Committee determines are relevant in light of the needs of the Board and the Company. In seeking director candidates, the Nominating & Governance Committee uses a director candidate qualification matrix that compares the skills, experience, and competencies of existing directors, directors that are expected to retire in the near or medium-term and the anticipated future strategic and operational strategies and development needs of the Company in order to identify skills, experience and/or competencies that may otherwise be absent from the Board’s future composition. It also uses its and the Board’s professional contact networks and/or director search firms to identify and recommend to the Board suitable director candidates.

The Nominating & Governance Committee selects qualified candidates consistent with criteria approved by the Board and presents them to the full Board, which decides whether to nominate the candidate for election to the Board. The Nominating & Governance Committee Charter authorizes the Nominating & Governance Committee to retain such outside experts, at the Company’s expense, as it deems necessary and appropriate to assist it in the execution of its duties. The Nominating & Governance Committee evaluates candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner as it evaluates other candidates. A further discussion of the process for stockholder nominations and recommendations of director candidates is found under the caption “How“How Stockholders May Nominate or Recommend Director Candidates.Candidates.”

Board Diversity

The Company does not have a formal policy concerning the diversity of its directors. In practice, the Nominating & Governance Committee, assistswith input from the Board, in establishingconsiders a list of criteria it seeks to address when filling a Board seatseeking director candidates and then seeks candidates that best meet those criteria without limitations imposed on the basis of race, gender or national origin. Diversity of experience and perspective is considered in reviewing the composition of the Board.

1112


Board Succession Planning

The Board, through its Nominating & Governance Committee, regularly reviews the particular skill sets required by the Board based on the nature of the Company’s business, strategic plans and regulatory challenges as well as the current performance of the incumbent directors. The By-Laws of the Company also has an age limit on service as a director which providesprovide that a director is not eligible for election or re-election after his or her 72nd72nd birthday. Customarily, a director chooses not to stand for re-election to the Board if his or her 72nd birthday occurs in the year in which he or she would be subject to re-election, even if such birthday occurs after the annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders. This is an added institutionalized mechanism for periodic change in directors in order to provide fresh insight.

Last year, Mr. Caldabaugh was reclassified as a Class III director and was re-elected at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2016. The Board elected to do this, acting upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, in order to facilitate the smooth transition of directors as Messrs. Finn and Caldabaugh retire and avoid those two experienced directors, previously both Class II directors, leaving the Board at the same time. Consequently, under the Company’s historical practice, it is now expected that Mr. Finn would retire as of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2018, Mr. Caldabaugh would retire as of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2019, and Ms. Arnold would retire as of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2020.
As a further measure to ensure a smooth transition upon Mr. Finn’s retirement, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, appointed Mr. Keenan to the Board as a Class I director effective as of February 25, 2016, approximately two years in advance of Mr. Finn’s expected retirement. The Nominating & Governance Committee expects to continue to seek director candidates to replace current directors as they retire and to recommend that they be appointed to the Board appropriately in advance of the effective retirement date of the applicable director.
How Stockholders May Nominate or Recommend Director Candidates

Any stockholder of record entitled to vote generally in the election of directors may nominate one or more persons for election as directors by complying with the procedures set forth in the Company’s By-laws,By-Laws, a copy of which may be obtained from the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary. The notice of intent to nominate a candidate for the Board must satisfy the requirements described in the By-lawsBy-Laws and be received by the Company not less than 90 calendar days nor more than 120 calendar days before the first anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting. The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by the Company to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director of the Company.

Stockholders may recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating & Governance Committee by notifying the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary in writing at Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., 100 North Point Center East, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022. The information that must be included in the notice and the procedures that must be followed (including the time frametimeframe for submission) by a stockholder wishing to recommend a director candidate for the Nominating & Governance Committee’s consideration are the same as would be required under the By-lawsBy-Laws if the stockholder wished to nominate that candidate directly.



1213


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Executive Compensation Philosophy

The Company’s executive compensation philosophy centers on three tenets:
Pay for performance;
▪Pay for performance;
▪Alignment with stockholders; and
▪Alignment with stockholders; and
Total target compensation set within a range of market median value for like skills and responsibilities.

Implementation of Philosophy

The Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”) is responsible for implementing the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and overseeing the Company’s executive compensation program. The Committee implements the Company’s executive compensation philosophy by:
Allocating a significant portion of total target compensation to incentive-based compensation opportunities;
Setting incentive plan objectives that the Committee believes directly or indirectly contribute to increased stockholder value;
Awarding a significant portion of total compensation opportunity in the form of equity;
Utilizing an annual competitive compensation study to guide decisions regarding total and individual compensation components and values; and
Requiring Named Executive Officers and other executives to acquire and hold a significant equity interest in the Company within five years after joining the Company.

14


Key Features of Our Executive Compensation
What We Do:
▪✓Allocating a
Pay-for-performance. A significant portion of total targetthe Named Executive Officers’ compensation to incentive-based compensation opportunities;
▪Setting incentive plan objectives that the Committee believes directly or indirectly contribute to increased stockholder value;
▪Awarding a material portion of total compensation opportunityis delivered in the form of equity;variable compensation that is connected to actual performance. For 2016, variable compensation comprised at least 77% of the targeted total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and, on average, 55% of the targeted total compensation for our other Named Executive Officers.
✓
Linkage between performance measures and operating objectives. Performance measures for incentive compensation are linked to operating objectives designed to create long-term stockholder value and to hold executives accountable for their individual performance and the performance of the Company.
▪✓Utilizing an annual competitive
Independent compensation studyconsultant. The Compensation Committee retains its own compensation consultant to guide decisions regarding totalreview the Company’s executive compensation program and individual compensation components and values; andpractices.
✓
“Double trigger” in the event of a change-in-control. In the event of a change-in-control, equity awards granted under the 2015 LTIP will accelerate upon a “double trigger” – meaning that both a change in control and qualifying termination of employment must occur for automatic acceleration.
▪✓Beginning in 2012, requiring
Stock ownership guidelines. Our Chief Executive Officer is required to hold stock equal to a multiple of five times his base salary and each of our other Named Executive Officers and other executivesis required to acquire and hold stock equal to a significant equity interest in the Company within five yearsmultiple of joining the Company.two to three times his or her base salary.

Named Executive Officers

For 2014, the Company’s Named Executive Officers were:

What We Don’t Do:
×
No change-in-control tax gross-ups.We do not provide change-in-control tax gross-ups to individuals promoted or hired after February 2012. Mr. Villoutreix is the only Named Executive Officer who remains eligible for excise tax gross-up payments under a legacy severance arrangement.
×We do not re-price stock options or buy-back equity grants.
×We do not allow directors and key executives (including all Named Executive Officers) to hedge or pledge their Company securities.

Named Executive Officers
For 2016, the Company’s Named Executive Officers were:
Name Position
   
Frédéric P. Villoutreix Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
   
Stephen D. DunmeadAllison Aden Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief OperatingFinancial Officer
Jeffrey A. CookEVP, CFO and Treasurer
   
Michel Fievez EVP, Paper & RTLExecutive Vice President, Engineered Papers
   
Daniel Lister(1)
Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures
Robert CardinCorporate Controller
Greerson G. McMullen(2)
 Former Executive Vice President, Strategy & Licensing, General Counsel and Secretary
Donald Meltzer(3)
Former Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures
_______________
(1) Mr. Lister joined the Company in July 2016.
(2) Mr. McMullen resigned from the Company, effective October 23, 2016.
(3) Mr. Meltzer served as Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures through July 4, 2016 and as an employee of the Company in the position of Head of Strategy for Advanced Materials & Structures through December 31, 2016.


1315


Pay for Performance

In 2014, management continued to deliver strong results for stockholders:2016, key metrics were as follows:
 
             
$ in millions, except per share amounts 2012 2013 2014
Net Sales $778.5

 
 $772.8

 
 $794.3

 
Operating Profit from continuing operations $151.7

 
 $124.9

 
 $106.1

 
Net Income $79.8

 
 $76.1

 
 $89.7

 
Net Income Per Share-Diluted $2.51

 
 $2.42

 
 $2.93

 
Cash Provided by Operations $174.6

 
 $178.1

 
 $165.9

 

Results have been recast for the effect of discontinued operations for all periods.
$ in millions, except per share amounts 201420152016
     
Net Sales $794.3$764.1$839.9
     
Operating Profit from continuing operations $106.1$103.0$106.1
     
Net Income $89.7$89.7$82.8
     
Net Income Per Share-Diluted $2.93$2.94$2.70
     
Cash Provided by Operations $165.9$144.7$129.7

Alignment with Stockholders

A significant percentage of our Named Executive Officers’ total target compensation was incentive-based, delivered in the form of annual cash incentive awards under the Annual Incentive Plan (the "AIP") and performance-based restricted stock under the Restricted Stock Plan (the "RSP").stock. For 2014,2016, incentive compensation comprised at least 75%77% of the targeted total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and, on average, 60%55% of the targeted total compensation for our other Named Executive Officers.Officers serving as executive officers at the time of the annual equity grants and who remained as executive officers of the Company as of December 31, 2016. The Committee believes that both these forms of compensationannual cash incentives and performance-based restricted stock reward achievement of key drivers of stockholder value, including earnings per share, EBITDA, gross profit,margin, net sales and free cash flow.operating profit.

Additionally, aA significant portion of the Named Executive Officers’ compensation is also delivered in the form of equity, rather than cash, to further align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with the interests of our stockholders. For 2014,2016, equity-based compensation comprised at least 50%55% of the targeted total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and, on average, 35%30% of the targeted total compensation for our other Named Executive Officers.

Officers serving as executive officers at the time of the annual equity grants and who remained as executive officers as of December 31, 2016.
Market-Based Competitive Compensation Levels

During 2014,2016, the Committee continued its philosophy of setting compensation within a range of the market median for each position, which experience has shown is the level at which the Company has been able to recruit and retain the level of talent that the Committee deems to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Compensation paid to the executive team is based on competitive market data developed annually by an independent compensation consultant retained by the Committee. For the 20142016 analysis, the Committee retained Willis Towers Watson whichto serve as its independent compensation consultant. Willis Towers Watson has no other ties to management or business with the Company that the Committee believes could impair its assessment.

ability to perform services for the Committee.
The competitive compensation analysis prepared by Willis Towers Watson in October 20132015 for evaluating 20142016 compensation was intended to reflect the scope of an executive'sexecutive’s responsibilities, experience in the position, and competitive market conditions. The main basis used for comparison was published survey data. For the 20142016 compensation review of compensation for U.S.-based Named Executive Officers, Willis Towers Watson compiled compensation data from the following compensation surveys: Towers Watson’s 20132015 General Industry Executive Compensation Database (442 participating organizations);Database; Towers Watson’s 20132014 Survey Report on Top Management Compensation (480 participating organizations);Compensation; and Mercer’s 20132015 Executive Benchmark Database, (2,546) participating organizations), while the 20142016 compensation review for the Named Executive Officer based in FranceLuxembourg was based on the Towers Watson’s 2013 France2014 Belgium Executive Compensation Database (303 participating organizations).applying a 10% premium to approximate the Luxembourg market. The survey data is used for all SWMCompany executives as the primary tool for market comparisons as this source provides larger sample sizes and more direct matching between positions. All published survey data was aged to a common date of July 1, 20142016 using an annual aging factor of 3.0% per year.

16


The October 20132015 compensation analysis also relied on proxy statement data from a peer group of 1416 companies to supplement the primary compensation survey sources used for benchmarking purposes with respect to the Chief Executive, and Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Controller positions. The Committee believes that the Company’s peer group should reflect the industries in which the Company potentially competes for business, executive talent and capital. Developed by Towers Watson, the peer group includes the following eight companies identified by ISS Proxy Advisory Services, a proxy advisory firm, as peers of the Company in its 2013 review of the Company: Neenah Paper, Inc., Innospec, Inc., KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, Wausau Paper Corp., Amcol International Corporation, RTI International Meals Inc., Headwaters Inc., and Clearwater Paper Corporation. In addition, Towers Watson included

14

the following six companies based on comparability in company revenue size and business model: OM Group Inc., Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, PH Glatfelter Company, Deluxe Corporation, Verso Paper Corporation, and OMNOVA Solutions Inc. The 2014 peer group was the same peer group that was used to evaluate 2013 compensation decisions, with the exception of the removal of Buckeye Technologies, Inc. due to its 2013 merger and HB Fuller Co. due to HB Fuller Co.’s domestic national focus and the addition of Deluxe Corp. given Deluxe Corp.’s international presence.

In 2014,2015, as part of its ongoing review of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee instructed Willis Towers Watson to re-evaluate the Company’s historical peer group. Based on this review, Willis Towers Watson recommended a revised peer group including the following 16 companies as peers of the Company in its review for purposes of evaluating 2016 executive compensation decisions: AEP Industries; Balchem Corporation; Calgon Carbon; Clearwater Paper Corporation; Deluxe Corporation; Innospec, Inc.; KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation; Louisiana-Pacific Corporation; Minerals Technologies; Myers Industries; Neenah Paper, Inc.; OM Group Inc.; OMNOVA Solutions Inc.; PH Glatfelter Company; Platform Specialty Products Corporation; and Quaker Chemical Corporation. The 2016 peer group was modified from the peer group that was used to evaluate 2015 compensation decisions, with the (i) remove Amcolremoval of Verso Paper Corp. due to its poor performance and lack of international revenues, RTI International Metals, Inc. due to its acquisition by Alcoa, and Zep Inc. due to its acquisition by New Mountain Capital and (ii) addition of AEP Industries, Balchem Corporation, Calgon Carbon, and Platform Specialty Products Corporation due to its 2014 acquisition by Minerals Technologies, Headwaters Inc. given its dissimilarity of industry (construction materials), and Wausau Paper Corp. given its incomparable revenue size to SWM and (ii) add Minerals Technologies, Myers Industries, Quaker Chemical Corporation, and Zep Inc. given their comparability ofin revenue size and industry focus (and inclusion in the 2014 ISS peer group).

industry. Included in the October 20132015 compensation analysis was an overview of the peer group companies’ performance compared to that of the Company for fiscal years 20102012 through 2012,2014, based on these companies'companies’ public filings. The median of the peer group’s 3-year average return on capital was 7%8%. In comparison, the Company’s 3-year average return on capital was 14%13%, higher than 86%falling within the 73% of the peer group.
In October 2016, as part of its peers.

ongoing review of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Committee instructed Willis Towers Watson to re-evaluate the Company’s historical peer group. Based on this review, Willis Towers Watson recommended a revised peer group to (i) remove OM Group due to its acquisition by Apollo Management and Platform Specialty Chemical given poor performance and (ii) add Innophos Holdings due to comparability in revenue size and industry.
The Committee uses the compensation analysis as a guide to determine whether executives'executives’ compensation is competitive. The analysis evaluates the following components: base salary; annual incentive bonus (AIP compensation assuming(assuming attainment of the target objective level, as a percentage of base salary); target total cash compensation (base salary plus AIP)target level annual incentive); long-term incentive compensation (assuming attainment of the target objective level); and target total direct compensation, which is the sum of base salary plus AIPannual incentive plus long-term incentive compensation at the target level.levels.

Willis Towers Watson considered 20142016 target total direct compensation to be competitive if it fell with +/-20%- 20% of the market median. All of the Named Executive Officers’ total target compensation fell within the competitive range other than Mr. Michel Fievez. The compensation of Michel Fievez, Executive Vice President, Reconstituted Tobacco, is based in France. Mr. Fievez’s compensationEVP, Engineered Papers, exceeds the + 20% variance due to the competitive recruitment of Mr. Fievez given his extensive knowledge and experience in the industry. In addition, Mr. Fievez has responsibility not only for the Reconstituted Tobacco business (including the U.S.-based wrapper and binder business) but alsoFievez’s serves onas a member of the Company’s Executive Strategic Council. Mr. Fievez alsoCouncil and has responsibilities related tofor our reconstituted tobacco leaf (RTL)two joint ventureventures in China. Therefore, Mr. Fievez’s role within the positionCompany has more responsibilityresponsibilities and retention risk than the benchmarked positions and the Committee, in consultation with Willis Towers Watson, determined that the adjustment from the market median wasremained appropriate to reflect these differences in responsibility. In late 2014, Mr. Fievez was given additional responsibility as head of the Company’s global operations for the Paper and RTL business units.responsibilities.



1517


Executive Compensation Plans, Form of Payment and Approval Process

The 20142016 executive compensation program applicable to the Named Executive Officers consisted of the following principal elements:

Compensation Element Method for Establishing its Value Form of Payment Who Establishes Objectives and Participation
       
Base Salary 
Competitive Compensation Analysis; subjective evaluation of performance applied to adjust +/− 10% from 50th50th percentile of the market reference point.
 Cash Annually, Chief Executive Officer recommends and the Committee approves for all Named Executive Officers other than Chief Executive Officer. Chief Executive Officer’s base salary is approved annually by the Committee, with ratification by the independent members of the Board.
       
Annual Incentive Plan Competitive Compensation Analysis; AIPannual incentive opportunity is based on a percentage of base salary; attainment is performance-based and measured over a year. Cash Chief Executive Officer recommends and the Committee approves: (i) Named Executive Officer participation in the AIP;annual incentive program; (ii) corporate and business unit objectives at beginning of cycle; and (iii) performance against corporate, business unit and individual objectives at year end. Committee approves, with ratification by the independent members of the Board, Chief Executive Officer participation in the AIP,annual incentive program, his objectives and his performance against corporate and individual objectives at year end.
       
Restricted Stock PlanEquity Awards Competitive Compensation Analysis for performance share award and time-based share award opportunities based on a percentage of base salary; achievement is performance and service-based. 
RestrictedEquity in the form of restricted stock and performance shares granted following the completion of each year of an award cycle and generally vest one year after grant.shares.

Time-based restricted stock granted at the beginning of the year.year and generally vest in two tranches over a two-year period.

Performance shares settled in restricted stock at the end of performance period and generally vest one-year after performance certification.

Dividends and voting rights attach when granted.
 Chief Executive Officer recommends target grant levels and performance share objectives for each Named Executive Officer and the Committee approves (i) performance share objectives and (ii) evaluation of performance against objectives. The Committee approves, with ratification by the independent members of the Board, Chief Executive Officer target grant levels and evaluation of performance against objectives.
       



1618




Compensation Element Method for Establishing its Value Form of Payment Who Establishes Objectives and Participation
Executive Severance Plan(1)
Plan(1)		 Provides a severance benefit equal to three times highest base salary and incentive compensation earned under the AIP PlanCompany’s annual incentive program over prior three years and certain other benefits over priorfor a period of three years in case of a change of control and between 6-24severance not to exceed 24 months salary and certain other benefits in the event of a qualifying termination for other than cause or voluntary departure.prior to a change of control. Cash Participation in the Executive Severance Planexecutive severance plans and the terms of the planplans were approved by the Committee and the full Board. The multiples of annual compensation awarded by the plan were initially established based on a market assessment. The plan was revised in 2012 to eliminate excise tax gross-up payments for new participants.Board, respectively.
       
Deferred Compensation Plan In addition to a participant’s voluntary deferral of salary or bonus that has been earned, Company contributions may be made to participant accounts. Cash The Chief Executive Officer recommends and the Committee must approve any discretionary Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan.
________________________
(1)
Change of control benefits are contingent upon providing continued services, as requested, through a change of control thereby increasing the ability of the Company to accomplish that taskthe change of control transaction with an intact management team, while recognizing a degree of security must be provided to retain officers who may well be out of a position following their implementationthe consummation of such a change of control. Further information concerning the severance benefits are found in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control” section.

Base Salary

In November 2013, senior management, including2015, based on the compensation analysis performed by Willis Towers Watson as well as individual performance, the Committee approved the 2016 annual base salaries for the then-serving Named Executive Officers, recommended that they should receive no 2014as set forth in the table below. In connection with the commencement of his employment with the Company, the Committee established Daniel Lister’s initial base salary increase at that timelevel after considering market practices, the expected outlook for 2014 comparedcompensation previously awarded by the Company to 2013 results. The Committee deferred to management’s recommendationMr. Lister’s predecessor and did not adjust the 2014 base salary levelscompensation received from the levels approved in 2013 for the Named Executive Officers. The 2014 base salary for each Named Executive Officer is set forth below:Mr. Lister’s former employer.
Name Position 2016 Base Salary 2015 Base Salary
       
Frédéric P. Villoutreix Chief Executive Officer $827,502 $803,400
       
Allison Aden EVP, Finance and CFO $440,000 $440,000
       
Michel Fievez EVP, Engineered Papers 
$397,284(1)
 
$399,535(1)
       
Daniel Lister EVP, Advanced Materials & Structures $425,000 --
       
Robert Cardin Controller $258,223 
$311,777(2)
       
Greerson G. McMullen Former EVP Strategy & Licensing, General Counsel and Secretary $498,623 $484,100
       
Donald Meltzer Former EVP, Advanced Materials & Structures $423,300 $415,000
_______________
(1)Mr. Fievez’s compensation is paid in Euros and his 2015 base salary was converted at the December 31, 2015 exchange rate of 1.0867 Euros to the U.S. dollar and his 2016 base salary was converted at the December 31, 2016 exchange rate of 1.0568 Euros to the U.S. dollar.
(2)
NamePosition
2014 Base
Salary
Change from 2013 Base
Salary
Frédéric P. VilloutreixChief Executive Officer$780,000—
Jeffrey A. CookEVP,Mr. Cardin served as interim CFO &and Treasurer$345,050—
Stephen A. DunmeadChief Operating Officer$485,000—
Michel FievezEVP, Paper & RTL$405,628(1)—
Greerson G. McMullenGeneral Counsel beginning on April 3, 2015 and Secretary$470,000—ending on October 31, 2015 when Ms. Aden joined the Company. At the end of each quarter during this period, Mr. Cardin received a true-up payment equal to the difference between his base salary and the 2015 base salary for the former CFO. For the time prior to and following his service as interim CFO, Mr. Cardin’s annual base salary was $250,702. The reduction in base salary for Mr. Cardin, as compared to 2015, relates to the cessation of the true up payments following the appointment of Ms. Aden to the position of CFO.

__________
19


(1) Mr. Fievez’s compensation is paid in Euros and was converted at the December 31, 2014 exchange rate of 1.2136 Euros to the
U.S. dollar.

17


20142016 Annual Incentive PlanProgram

The Annual Incentive Plan providesEach year, Named Executive Officers are provided with a cash-based award opportunity that may be earned if performance objectives are achieved over a fiscal year period. AIPAnnual incentive compensation is intended to reward the performance of executive officers based on the attainment of the Company’s objectives. Target AIPThe 2016 target annual incentive opportunities for the continuing Named Executive Officers remained at the same levels that were established for 20132015 and ranged from 50%40% to 100% of a participant’s base salary, with maximum AIPannual incentive opportunities for the Named Executive Officers in 20142016 ranging from 92.5%80% to 190%200% of a participant’s base salary. In connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Strategy & Licensing, General Counsel and Secretary, Mr. McMullen’s 2016 target annual incentive opportunity was increased from 50% to 65% of his base salary, effective January 1, 2016. Mr. Lister’s target annual incentive opportunity was established when he joined the Company at 60% of his base salary after considering market practices, the compensation previously awarded by the Company to Mr. Lister’s predecessor and the compensation received from Mr. Lister’s former employer. Mr. Lister may earn a maximum annual incentive payment equal to 120% of his base salary, with any payout prorated to reflect his July 2016 start date.
Each year, objectives are established forto measure corporate, business unit and individual performance, with the 20142016 individual award component for Named Executive Officers not exceeding 30% of the total award opportunity. The Committee approvesapproved the corporate and business unit objectives, as applicable, for the Named Executive Officers.

Annual Incentive Plan objectives Objectives for the Named Executive Officers’ 20142016 incentive award opportunities are set out below. These objectives were selected because they were deemed by the Committee to be the primary drivers for delivering increased stockholder value. The performance objectives were established based onafter considering economic conditions affecting the legacy tobacco related business, expenses of integrating recently acquired film and filtration businesses, the Company’s prior year performance, as well as the Company’s internal long-term operating plan.

The AIP award for Mr. Fievez is based on corporate, RTL business unit, and individual objectives. AIPAnnual incentive awards to Messrs.Mr. Villoutreix and Dunmead and the Named Executive Officers in Shared Services (financial, legal, human resources and information technology and research)technology) are based on achievement of corporate and individual objectives. The annual incentive award for Mr. Fievez is based on corporate, Engineered Papers business unit, and individual objectives and the annual incentive award for Messrs. Lister and Meltzer were based on corporate, Advanced Materials & Structures business unit, and individual objectives. All 20142016 corporate and business unit objectives exclude the impact of impairment and restructuring charges.

charges and currency fluctuations.
  2014 Objectives
MEASUREMENT METRICS Threshold Target (100%) Outstanding Maximum
         
Corporate Metrics        
100% Adjusted earnings per share(1)
 
$3.15
 
$3.25
 
$3.35
 
$3.45
         
RTL Unit Metrics        
40% Gross profit 
$76.6
 
$79.1
 
$81.5
 
$83.9
40% Net sales 
$179.2
 
$185.5
 
$192.0
 
$197.6
10% Days Sale Outstanding 
$40.4
 
$37.6
 
$36.6
 
$35.6
10% Days Inventory Outstanding 
$47.0
 
$40.4
 
$39.1
 
$37.9
  2016 Objectives
MEASUREMENT METRICS Threshold Target (100%) Outstanding Maximum
         
Corporate Metrics        
         
100% Adjusted earnings per share(1)
 
$2.98
 
$3.17
 
$3.27
 
$3.36
         
         
Engineered Papers(2)
        
         
50% Net Sales (in millions) 
$454.9
 
$479.1
 
$504.9
 
$526.9
         
50% Gross Margin (in millions) 
$142.8
 
$150.9
 
$159.8
 
$167.8
         
         
Advanced Materials & Structures(3)
        
         
50% Net Sales (in millions) 
$280.3
 
$297.9
 
$312.8
 
$327.7
         
50% Operating Profit (in millions) 
$30.0
 
$34.8
 
$39.7
 
$44.9
         
     
Individual Maximum of 6 individual objective categories

_______________
IndividualMaximum of 4 individual objectives
________
(1)
Earnings per share is diluted earnings per share from continuing operations at the consolidated level, adjusted to reflect items included in the Company’s approved budget and to the extent not reflected in such budget, it excludes restructuring related expenses and share buy backs.charges, purchase price accounting adjustments, transaction expenses, acquisition integration costs related to mergers and acquisitions, the impact of

20


future stock buybacks, and unusual and non-recurring items determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and other miscellaneous adjustments.
(2)Excludes certain specific budgeted items such as the outcome of specified litigation and Advanced Fibers & Materials results.
(3)Includes DelStar, Argotec (only two months of results) and related corporate overhead, and excludes certain specific budgeted items such as the outcome of specified litigation.

The Committee weighted each component of the Named Executive Officers’ AIPannual incentive opportunity to reflect their differing responsibilities and opportunities to affect business outcomes. For 2014,2016, weighting between the corporate, RTL business unitEngineered Papers, Advanced Materials & Structures, and individual components for each of the Named Executive Officers’ total AIPannual incentive award opportunity was as follows:


18



 
Name Corporate Business Unit Individual Business Unit Corporate Business Unit Individual Business Unit
  
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 80% — 20% N/A 80% — 20% N/A
Jeffrey A. Cook 70% — 30% Shared Services
Stephen D. Dunmead 70% — 30% N/A
 
Allison Aden 70% — 30% Shared Services
 
Michel Fievez 35% 35% 30% RTL 35% 35% 30% Engineered Papers
 
Daniel Lister 35% 35% 30% Advanced Materials & Structures
 
Robert Cardin 70% — 30% Shared Services
 
Greerson G. McMullen 70% — 30% Shared Services 70% — 30% Shared Services
 
Donald Meltzer 35% 35% 30% Advanced Materials & Structures

Actual performance achieved in 20142016 against the corporateCorporate adjusted earnings per share metric, stated as a percentage of the target objective, was 80%136.8%. Actual performance achieved in 20142016 against the RTLEngineered Papers business unit for the days inventory outstandingNet Sales metric was 78.8%112.0% and for the Gross Margin metric was 200%. The RTLActual performance achieved in 2016 against the Advanced Materials & Structure business unit did not meetfor the performance objectives with respect to net sales, gross profit or days sales outstanding, resulting in a zero payoutNet Sales metric was 0% and for these metrics.the Operating Profit metric was 59.1%. The total earned payout for each of the Named Executive Officers is reflected in the column labeled “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” in the 20142016 Summary Compensation Table.

2016 Annual Equity Awards
Restricted Stock Plan – 2013– 2014 Performance Cycle

As a result ofIn February 2016, the acquisition of DelStar Inc.Committee granted the Chief Executive Officer and the challenging earnings profile for 2014, in February 2014, the Committee reduced the targetthen serving Named Executive Officers long-term incentive award opportunityopportunities for the second year of the 2013-20142016 performance cycle in comparison tounder the target award opportunity for the first year of the 2013-2014 performance cycle.Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 LTIP”). The Committee also approved an EBITDA performance metric for the second year of the 2013-2014 performance cycle tied to 65% of the award opportunity for that year and introduced a service-based restricted stock award for the remaining 35% of the 2014 award opportunity to increase the retentive value of the long-term incentive program. As a result of these changes, the target opportunity for the second year of the 2013-20142016 performance cycle was reduced to 75% of the target opportunity for the first year of the 2013-2014 performance cycle and was equal to 150%240% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and ranged from 38%40% - 105% of base salary115% for our other Named Executive Officers. The target opportunities, as a percentage of base salary, remained the same as the levels established in 2015 except for Messrs. Villoutreix and Cardin. After reviewing the competitive positioning of the total direct compensation for Messrs. Villoutreix and Cardin as compared to the market data, the Committee increased Mr. Villoutreix’s target award from 200% of base salary to 240% of base salary and Mr. Cardin’s target award from 25% of base salary to 40% of base salary. Mr. Lister’s long-term incentive award opportunity was established when he joined the Company at 60% of base salary, with his 2016 long-term incentive awards prorated to reflect his July 2016 start date. Mr. Lister’s long-term incentive opportunity was determined after considering market practices, the compensation previously awarded by the Company to Mr. Lister’s predecessor and the compensation received from Mr. Lister’s former employer.

21


The Restricted Stock Plan2015 LTIP provides opportunities to earn performance shares based on achievement of performance objectives. As with AIPannual incentive compensation, objectives for 20142016 were established based on the Company’s prior year performance and the Company’s internal operating plan. Additionally, to encourage retention, any performance shares earned during each year of the performance cycle vest one year following Committee certification of the achievement of the performance objective, rather than immediately at the end of the performance cycle. For 2014, asAs set forth in the table below, the Committee established an adjusted EBITDA performance metric tied tovesting of 65% of the target award. The Committee approved a shift from2016 annual equity grants was based on the useachievement of a ROIC performance metric that was used for the first year of the 2013-2014 performance cycle to an adjusted EBITDA metric to more closely align the Company’s long-term incentive program with the Company’s strategic operating plan and to avoid disincentivizing management from pursuing strategic acquisitions.EBITDA.
 
           
  2014  
           
  Threshold Target Outstanding Maximum Actual
Adjusted EBITDA
($ millions) (1)
 $175.0 $187.3 $190.3 $193.4 $179.3
2016
          
 Threshold Target Outstanding Maximum Actual
          
Adjusted$163.2 $173.6 $178.8 $184.0 $180.1
EBITDA         
($ millions)(1)
         
_______________________
(1)
(1)
Adjusted EBITDA was calculated as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude the impact of currency fluctuations, restructuring related expenses, DelStar Inc. purchase price accounting adjustments, acquisition and merger-related integration expenses and legal fees related to two acquisitions.
unusual and non-reoccurring items as determined in accordance with GAAP.


19

Based on the Company’s 20142016 adjustedEBITDA performance, the Committee approved payout at 51.2%161.6% of target. As a result, in February 2015,2017, the eligible Named Executive Officers were granted shares of restricted stock with respect to 65% of the second year award opportunity of the 2013-2014 performance cycle,2016 annual equity awards, in the amounts set forth in the table below. In order to enhance the retentive component of the program, these shares will vest in February 2016,2018, subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the vesting date:


date. In connection with their separations from the Company, Messrs. Meltzer and McMullen forfeited the February 2016 performance share awards.
Name Number of Shares of Restricted Stock
   
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 7,76160,174
Jeffrey A. Cook 1,717
Stephen D. DunmeadAllison Aden 3,37815,331
Michel Fievez 1,3767,427
Greerson G. McMullen 1,169
Daniel Lister3,789
Robert Cardin3,130

In addition, pursuant to the service-based component of the 20142016 award opportunity, in February 2014,2016, the Named Executive Officers were granted shares of restricted stock with respect to 35% of the second year award opportunity of the 2013-2014 performance cycle2016 annual equity awards, as set forth in the table below. One half of the shares vested in February 2015,2017, and subject to continued employment with the Company, the remaining half will vest in February 2016:2018.

22


Name Number of Shares of
Restricted Stock
   
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 8,16216,634
Jeffrey A. Cook 1,806
Stephen D. DunmeadAllison Aden 3,5524,238
Michel Fievez 1,4462,052
Daniel Lister1,048
Robert Cardin866
Greerson G. McMullen(1)
 1,230
    2,714(2)
Donald Meltzer(1)
2,128
_______________
(1)In connection with Messrs. Meltzer’s and McMullen’s separations from the Company, Mr. Meltzer forfeited half of the shares reported in the table above. McMullen forfeited all of the shares reported in the table above.
(2)In connection with his promotion to Executive Vice President, Strategy & Licensing, General Counsel and Secretary, Mr. McMullen’s 2016 award opportunity was increased by 15% in March 2016.
In addition, during 2015, the Committee approved grants of 5,000 shares of time-based restricted stock to Messrs. McMullen and Cardin to recognize their performance during 2015 and for retentive purposes. These grants were made in January 2016 and were subject to each executive’s continued service through the vesting date in January 2020. In connection with his separation, Mr. McMullen forfeited this grant. During 2016, the Committee approved an additional grant of 6,000 shares of time-based restricted stock to Mr. Cardin to recognize his performance and for retention purposes. This grant was made in March 2016 and is subject to his continued service through the vesting date in August 2018.
As previously reported, Mr. Fievez received a performance award of 4,517 shares of restricted stock under the French Sub-Plan of the Restricted Stock Plan in recognition of 2015 performance. The shares vested on February 25, 2017 but remained subject to transferability restrictions applicable to the French Sub-Plan until February 25, 2019. At the time of the award and for a majority of the performance period, Mr. Fievez was an employee in France. In October 2015, Mr. Fievez relocated from France to Luxembourg. The Company’s tax consultant recommended to the Company that the restrictions on transferability applicable to French awards be removed from Mr. Fievez’s 2015 performance award. Accordingly, in 2016, the Company modified Mr. Fievez’s 2015 performance award to waive the restriction on transferability, effective as of the February 25, 2017 vesting date.
Compensation for Mr. Lister
On July 5, 2016, Mr. Daniel Lister became Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures. The Committee approved Mr. Lister’s compensation package after considering the global scope of his role at the Company and competitive compensation data provided by Willis Towers Watson. Mr. Lister’s initial compensation package included an annual base salary of $425,000, an annual bonus targeted at 60% of base salary (pro-rated for his 2016 service), and a long-term incentive opportunity targeted at 60% of his base salary (pro-rated for his 2016 service).
Compensation for Mr. Meltzer
As noted above, Mr. Meltzer served as Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures through July 4, 2016 and as an employee of the Company in the position of Head of Strategy for Advanced Materials & Structures through December 31, 2016. During his service as Head of Strategy for Advanced Materials & Structures, Mr. Meltzer continued to receive his annual base salary and remained eligible to receive his 2016 annual incentive award in accordance with the terms of the 2016 annual incentive program. In addition, in connection with his separation, the Committee waived the service-based vesting requirement under one-half of Mr. Meltzer’s 2016 long-term incentive awards. Pursuant to the terms of the modified award, Mr. Meltzer vested in one-half of the 2016 service-based component of the 2016 long-term incentive awards in February 2017, on the original vesting date of the

23


award.  Absent this modification, Mr. Meltzer would have forfeited the award upon his separation from the Company. Mr. Meltzer did not receive any additional compensation in connection with his departure from the Company.
“Say on Pay”: Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

In 2014, in a non-binding advisory vote, the Board asked the Company’s stockholders to indicate whether they approved the Company'sCompany’s executive compensation as disclosed in the 2014 proxy statement (“say on pay”). As part of its review of the Company’s executive compensation program in 2016, the Committee considered the stockholder’s strong approval of the Company’s 2014 executive compensation program as disclosed in the 2014 proxy statement, as indicated by approximately 92% of the votes cast being in favor of the Company’s “say on pay” vote at the Company’s 2014 annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholders.Stockholders. Thus, the Committee determined that the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and compensation elements continued to be appropriate and did not make any specific changes to the Company’s executive compensation program in response to the 2014 “say on pay” vote.

Compensation Approval Process

Each year in the fall, the Chief Executive Officer meets with the Committee and Willis Towers Watson, the Committee’s independent consultant, to review the annual competitive compensation analysis. During the year, Willis Towers Watson also provides advice to the Committee regarding the composition of the compensation peer group and performs a competitive analysis of the Company’s compensation practices compared to the peer group. At the Committee Chair’s discretion, she may meet separately with the independent compensation consultant. Based on this meeting and any follow-up work identified at that time, an executive compensation proposal is prepared and provided to the full Committee in November for its review. At the November meeting, the Committee discusses the executive compensation program, and evaluates whether the elements of compensation for officers and key employees are competitive.competitive, and approves the officers’ base salaries for the upcoming year. The Committee meets again in February to approve the officers’ base salaries, annual incentive targets, restricted stockequity incentive plan targets, and performance level objectives for the upcoming year, and the prior year’s performance and incentive compensation payouts, with ratification of the Chief Executive Officer’s base salary and incentive compensation by the independent members of the Board.

In 2014,2016, the Committee reviewed the risks associated with the design of the executive compensation program and whether the program was reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Committee concluded that the program design, metrics and objectives, taken as a whole and considered within the other financial control and approval processes in place at the Company, were not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.


20

At the Board’s meeting in February, Board meeting, the Committee generally provides a report on its anticipated actions on executive compensation for the upcoming year as well as its estimate of payouts under the incentive compensation award opportunities for the just-completed year. The Committee also periodically reports onto the Board regarding any targeted equity grants made during the year outside the equity opportunity provided by the incentive compensation plan awards. The Board discusses the current and upcoming year compensation for the Chief Executive Officer in the non-management directors meeting. When audited financial results are available, or known, the Committee completes its evaluation of the performance attained against objectives and the Committee approves the final award payments.


24


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation“Compensation Discussion & AnalysisAnalysis” with management.

Based on the review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation“Compensation Discussion & AnalysisAnalysis” be included in the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Claire L. Arnold (Chair)
William A. Finn
Anderson D. Warlick

25
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Claire L. Arnold (Chair)
Heinrich Fischer
Anderson D. Warlick






21

20142016 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our other three most highly compensated executive officers who served in such capacities as of December 31, 2014.

2016 and two additional individuals whom would have been among the other three most highly compensated executive officers but for the fact that they were not serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2016.
Name and principal
 position
 (a)
 
Year
 (b)
 
Salary
 ($)
 (c)
 
Bonus
 ($)
 (d)
 
Stock
 Awards
 ($)
 (e)(1)
 
Option
 Awards
 ($)
 (f)
 
Non-Equity
 Incentive
 Plan
 Compensation
 ($)
 (g)(2)
 
Change in Pension Value
And
Non-qualified
 Deferred
 Compensation
 Earnings
 ($)
 (h)
 
All Other
 Compensation
 ($)
 (i)
 
Total ($)
 (j)
 
                    
Frédéric P. Villoutreix
Chief Executive Officer (3)

 2014 780,000 — 1,080,649 — 659,880 — 237,062 2,757,591 
 2013 780,000 — 1,494,975 — 1,170,312 — 264,178 3,709,465 
 2012 780,000 — 1,601,619 — 810,986 — 130,867 3,323,472 
                    
Jeffrey A. Cook
EVP, CFO and Treasurer (4)

 2014 345,050 — 239,068 — 179,909 — 86,948 850,975 
 2013 345,050 — 330,685 — 302,699 — 71,509 1,049,943 
 2012 299,208 — 325,245 — 151,090 — 100,023 875,566 
                    
Stephen D. Dunmead
  Chief Operating Officer (5)
 2014 485,000 — 470,351 — 330,188 — 119,505 1,405,044 
 2013 398,393 — 928,717 — 461,364 — 175,999 1,964,473 
                    
Michel Fievez
EVP, RTL (6)

 2014 405,628 — 191,524 — 136,003 9,114 83,746 826,015 
 2013 460,810 — 254,164 — 220,142 10,885 108,262 1,054,264 
 2012 459,623 109,659 305,141 — 252,924 12,796 68,458 1,208,574 
                    
Greerson G. McMullen
General Counsel and Secretary (7)
 2014 470,000 — 162,792 — 303,056 — 73,333 1,009,181 
 2013 296,304 100,000 484,453 — 280,248 — 175,133 ,1,336,138 
Name and principal position
(a)		 Year
(b)		 Salary($)
(c)		 Bonus ($)
(d)		 
Stock Awards
($)
(e)(1)
 Option Awards
($)
(f)		 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen-sation ($)
(g)(2)
 Change in Pension Value And Non-qualified Deferred Compen-sation Earnings ($)
(h)		 All Other Compen-sation
($)
(i)		 Total($)
(j)
                   
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 2016 827,502 —
 1,501,758
 —
 1,082,725
 —
 226,941 3,638,926
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(3)
 2015 803,400 —
 1,785,220
 —
 1,365,050
 —
 136,812 4,090,482
 2014 780,000 —
 1,080,649
 —
 659,880
 —
 237,062 2,757,591
                   
                   
Allison Aden 2016 440,000 —
 382,612
 —
 383,005
 —
 43,208 1,248,825
EVP, Finance and CFO(4)
 2015 73,333 —
 82,420
 —
 —
 —
 492 156,245
                   
                   
Michel Fievez 2016 397,284 —
 185,335
 —
 329,371
 10,029
 470,198 1,392,217
EVP, Engineered Papers(5)
 2015 372,294 39,954
 251,968
 —
 389,678
 6,201
 157,826 1,217,921
 2014 405,628 —
 191,524
 —
 136,003
 9,114
 93,876 836,145
                   
                   
Daniel Lister 2016 202,692 16,000
 105,712
 —
 125,418
 —
 25,628 475,451
EVP, Advanced Materials & Structures(6)
                  
                   
                   
Robert Cardin Corporate Controller(7)
 2016 258,223 —
 467,557
 —
 131,448
 —
 58,313 915,541
 2015 311,777 —
 69,677
 —
 300,553
 —
 36,069 718,076
                   
                   
Greerson G. McMullen 2016 430,616 —
 453,950
 —
 —
 —
 243,519 1,128,085
Former EVP, Strategy & Licensing, General Counsel and Secretary(8)
 2015 484,100 —
 268,958
 —
 513,047
 —
 73,996 1,340,101
 2014 470,000 —
 162,792
 —
 303,056
 —
 73,333 1,009,181
                   
Donald Meltzer 2016 423,300 —
 229,644
 —
 227,313
 —
 24,940 905,197
Former EVP, Advanced Materials & Structures(9)
 2015 180,897 104,580
 —
 —
 30,613
 —
 4,532 320,622
____________________
(1)
The amounts reported in this column for 20142016 represent (a) the performance share awards and restricted stock awards for 2014, the second year of the 2013-2014 performance cycle, that were awarded to eachas part of the Named Executive Officers under2016 annual equity grants and (b) the Company’s Restricted Stock Plan andincremental fair value associated with the modification to the service-based component of Mr. Meltzer’s 2016 long-term incentive award (totaling $37,580), in each case, valued in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). As discussed above in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis”, in 2016, the restrictions on transferability to Mr. Fievez’s 2015 performance share award were modified in connection with his relocation from France to Luxembourg. In addition, the 2016 amounts for Messrs. McMullen and Cardin include an award of 5,000 shares of time-based restricted stock granted under the Company’s 2015 LTIP in January 2016. For Mr. Cardin,

26


the 2016 amount also includes an award of 6,000 shares of time-based restricted stock granted under the Company’s 2015 LTIP in March 2016. The amounts otherwise included in this column for the performance share awards are calculated based on the probable satisfaction of the performance conditions for such awards at the time of grant. Assuming the highest level of performance would have been achieved for the performance shares, the maximum value of these awards at the grant date would be as follows: Mr. Villoutreix $2,477,882; Ms. Aden $631,305; Mr. Fievez $305,825; Mr. Lister $174,375; Mr. Cardin $128,865; Mr. McMullen $404,385 and Mr. Meltzer $316,885. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the amounts reported for the applicable year.
(2)The amounts includedreported in this column for 2016 represent annual incentive awards earned based on 2016 performance. Please see the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” for further information regarding the 2016 annual incentive program.
(3)The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Mr. Villoutreix consists of (a) $116,316 in Company contributions to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (b) $86,163 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (c) $15,900 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions and (d) $8,562 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums.
(4)The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Ms. Aden consists of (a) $11,594 in Company contributions to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (b) $10,106 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (c) $15,725 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions and (d) $5,783 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums.
(5)
Mr. Fievez’s compensation was paid in Euros and has been converted at the December 31, 2016 exchange rate of 1.0568 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2016, December 31, 2015 exchange rate of 1.0867 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2015 compensation and December 31, 2014 exchange rate of 1.2136 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2014 compensation. The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Mr. Fievez consists of (a) $74,229 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (b) $6,436 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums, (c) $17,808 in Luxembourg holiday pay, (d) $12,291 representing the lease and insurance expense associated with a Company provided car, (e) $144,169 in relocation expense, (f) $34,240 and $18,748 representing housing and goods and services allowances, respectively, in connection with his relocation to Luxembourg, (h) $5,812 in tax preparation services and (i) $156,465 in tax equalization payments. The amounts included with respect to the relocation expenses and the housing and goods and services allowances were valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost to the Company and represent the amount accrued for payment or paid to the service provider or Mr. Fievez, as applicable.Effective 2016, the amount reported in the Change in Pension and Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings represent the change in accumulated benefits under the Luxembourg Pension Plan and a French Pension Plan.
(6)The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Mr. Lister consists of (a) $859 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (b) $1,968 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums and (c) $22,801 in relocation expenses. The amounts included with respect to the relocation expenses were valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost to the Company and represent the amount accrued for payment or paid to the service provider or Mr. Lister, as applicable.
(7)The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Mr. Cardin consists of (a) $17,388 in Company contributions to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (b) $19,133 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (c) $5,892 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums and (d) $15,900 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions.
(8)Mr. McMullen resigned from the Company, effective October 23, 2016. The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Mr. McMullen consists of (a) $24,015 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (b) $7,181 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums (c) $10,800 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions and (d) $201,523 in relocation expenses related to Mr. McMullen’s relocation when he joined the Company in May 2013 ($100,000 of which was for the loss on the sale of Mr. McMullen’s house, $75,000 of which was for tax gross-ups and $26,523 of which was for closing costs). The amounts included with respect to the relocation expenses were valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost to the Company and represent the amount accrued for payment or paid to the service provider or Mr. McMullen, as applicable. Pursuant to the Company’s relocation expense reimbursement agreement with Mr. McMullen, had Mr. McMullen left the Company within eighteen months of the commencement of his employment, the Company’s obligation to reimburse Mr. McMullen would have expired, and Mr. McMullen would have had to reimburse the Company for any reimbursed expenses.
(9)Mr. Meltzer served as Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures through July 4, 2016 and as an employee of the Company in the position of Head of Strategy for Advanced Materials & Structures through December 31, 2016. The amount reported for 2016 in column (i) for Mr. Meltzer consists of (a) $5,683 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums, (b) $15,810 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions and (c) $3,447 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards.

27


2016 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table summarizes awards made to our Named Executive Officers in 2016.
Name
(a)		Grant Date
(b)		Approval Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2)
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks or Units
(#)(j)(3)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards
($)(k)(4)
   Threshold ($)(d)Target ($)(e)Maximum ($)(f)Threshold
(#)(g)		Target
(#)(h)		Maximum
(#)(i)		 
           
Frédéric P. VilloutreixN/AN/A455,436827,5021,655,004–––––
 2/24/162/24/16–––7,72330,89078,414–976,124
 2/24/162/24/16––––––16,634525,634
           
Allison AdenN/AN/A177,100308,000616,000–––––
 2/24/162/24/16–––1,9637,87019,908–248,692
 2/24/162/24/16––––––4,238133,920
           
Michel FievezN/AN/A120,377238,370476,741–––––
 2/24/162/24/16–––9533,8139,678–120,491
 2/24/162/24/16––––––2,05264,844
           
Daniel ListerN/AN/A64,388127,500255,000–––––
 7/5/167/5/16–––4861,9454,937–68,697
 7/5/167/5/16––––––1,04837,015
           
Robert CardinN/AN/A59,391103,289206,578–––––
 1/4/1611/20/15––––––5,000209,950
 2/24/162/24/16–––4051,6074,078–50,781
 2/24/162/24/16––––––86627,366
 3/14/163/14/16––––––6,000179,460
           
Greerson G. McMullen(5)
N/AN/A182,997318,255636,510–––––
1/4/1611/20/15––––––5,000209,950
2/24/162/24/16–––1,2605,04112,797–159,296
2/24/162/24/16––––––2,08865,980
 3/14/163/14/16      62618,724
           
Donald Meltzer(6)
N/AN/A128,260253,980507,960–––––
 2/24/162/24/16–––9883,95010,028–124,820
 2/24/162/24/16      2,12867,244
 7/5/167/3/16––––––
    1,064(7)
37,580
_______________
(1)These amounts consist of the threshold, target and maximum cash award levels under the 2016 annual incentive program. The amount actually earned by each Named Executive Officer is included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table. Please see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” for further information regarding the 2016 annual incentive awards.
(2)These amounts represent the threshold, target and maximum performance share awards are calculatedshares that could have been earned during the 2016 performance cycle under the Company’s 2015 LTIP. These performance shares were earned based on the probable satisfactionCompany’s adjusted EBITDA performance and will vest one year after the date on which the Committee certifies the adjusted EBITDA achievement level, subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through such date.
(3)For each of the Named Executive Officers these amounts represent shares of time-based restricted stock granted pursuant to the long-term incentive award opportunities under the Company’s 2015 LTIP. These 2016 long-term incentive award opportunity shares vest 50% in February 2017 and 50% in February 2018. In addition, the amounts for Messrs. McMullen and Cardin include a grant of 5,000 shares of time-based restricted stock under the Company’s 2015 LTIP, which vest in January 2020, and for Mr. Cardin, the amount also includes a grant of 6,000 shares of time-based restricted stock under the Company’s 2015 LTIP, which vests in August 2018.
(4)The amounts shown in this column are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and, in the case of the performance conditions for such awards atshares, are based upon the timeprobable outcome of grant. Assuming the highest level ofapplicable performance is achieved for the performance shares, the maximum value of these awards at the grant date would be as follows: Mr. Villoutreix - $1,783,163; Mr. Cook - $394,446; Mr. Dunmead - $776,149; Mr. Fievez - $316,039; and Mr. McMullen - $268,679.conditions. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the year ended December 31, 20142016, for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the amounts reported for the applicable year. The amounts reported in prior years have been adjusted to represent the grant date fair value, based on the probable achievement of the performance conditions at the time of grant, rather than the previously reported grant date fair value based on actual achievement. The amounts previously reported in 2013 and 2012 were higher than the amounts calculated based on the grant date fair value, assuming probable satisfaction of the performance conditions at the time of grant.
(2)
The amounts reported in this column for 2014 represent amounts earned under the Annual Incentive Plan based on 2014 performance. Please see the Compensation Discussion & Analysis for further information regarding the 2014 Annual Incentive Plan.
(3)
The amount reported for 2014 in column (i) for Mr. Villoutreix consists of (i) $101,719 in Company contributions to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (ii) $110,483 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (iii) $15,300 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions, and (iv) $9,560 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums.
(4)
The amount reported for 2014 in column (i) for Mr. Cook consists of (i) $23,565 in Company contributions to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (ii) $39,039 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (iii) $15,300 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions, and (iv) $9,044 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums.amounts.


2228



(5)In connection with his resignation, Mr. McMullen forfeited his 2016 annual incentive award opportunity and 2016 equity grants.
(5)
(6)		Mr. Dunmead commenced employmentIn connection with his separation from the Company, Mr. Meltzer forfeited 2016 performance awards and one-half of the service-based component under the 2016 long-term incentive awards. As a result of his continued service as Chief Operating Officer on March 6, 2013. The amount reportedHead of Strategy for 2014 in column (i) forAdvanced Materials & Structures through December 31, 2016, Mr. Dunmead consists of (i) $41,482 in Company contributionsMeltzer remained eligible to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (ii) $55,537 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (iii) $15,300 in 401(k) savings plan matching contributions, and (iv) $7,186 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums.receive his 2016 annual incentive award.
(7)
(6)
Mr. Fievez’s compensationThis amount represents one-half of the 2016 long-term incentive award that was paid in Euros and has been converted at the December 31, 2014 exchange rate of 1.2136 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2014 compensation, December 31, 2013 exchange rate of 1.3787 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2013 compensation, and December 31, 2012 exchange rate of 1.3225 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2012 compensation. The amount reported for 2014 in column (i) for Mr. Fievez consists of (i) $33,707 in Company contributions to a French mandated defined contribution plan, (ii) $5,416 for participation in France’s gain sharing program, a French mandated defined contribution plan, (iii) $5,179 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums, (iv) $33,802 in French holiday pay, and (v) $15,772 representing the lease expense associated with a Company provided car.
(7)
Mr. McMullen commenced employment withmodified by the Company as General Counselin connection with Mr. Meltzer’s separation from the Company and Secretarydoes not reflect a new equity grant. As noted in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” in 2016, the vesting terms of one-half of the service-based component of Mr. Meltzer’s 2016 long-term incentive award were modified in connection with his separation from the Company to allow him to vest in the award in February 2017, on May 15, 2013. The amount reported for 2014 in column (i) for Mr. McMullen consiststhe original vesting date of (i) $34,515 in Company contributions to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, (ii) $21,296 in dividends on unvested restricted stock awards, (iii) $7,022 in Company-paid life and disability insurance premiums, and (iv) $10,500 401(k) savings plan matching contributions.award.


23

2014 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table summarizes awards made to our Named Executive Officers in 2014
29
Name
 (a)
 
Grant Date
 (b)
 Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) 
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stocks or Units
 (#)
 (i)(3)
 Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards ($)(j)(4)
    Threshold ($)(c) 
Target
 ($)(d)
 Maximum ($)(e) 
Threshold
 (#)(f)
 
Target
 (#)(g)
 
Maximum
 (#)(h)
  
Frédéric P. Villoutreix N/A 429,000 780,000 1,482,000 -- -- -- -- --
  2/26/14 -- -- -- 3,791 15,158 38,480 -- 702,422
  2/26/14 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,162 378,227
Jeffrey A.Cook N/A 119,042 207,030 383,006 -- -- -- -- --
  2/26/14 -- -- -- 839 3,353 8,512 -- 155,378
  2/26/14             1,806 83,690
Stephen D. Dunmead N/A 223,100 388,000 717,800 -- -- -- -- --
  2/26/14 -- -- -- 1,650 6,598 16,749 -- 305,751
  2/26/14 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,552 164,600
Michel Fievez N/A 116,618 202,814 375,206 -- -- -- -- --
  2/26/14 -- -- -- 672 2,687 6,820 -- 124,516
  2/26/14 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,446 67,008
Greerson G. McMullen N/A 175,663 305,500 565,175 -- -- -- -- --
  2/26/14 -- -- -- 571 2,284 5,798 -- 105,794
  2/26/14 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,230 56,998
                   
__________

(1) These amounts consist of the threshold, target and maximum cash award levels under the 2014 AIP. The amount actually earned by each Named Executive Officer is included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table. Please see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” for further information regarding the AIP awards.

(2)    These amounts represent the threshold, target and maximum performance shares that may be earned during the second year of the 2013-2014 performance cycle under the Company’s RSP. These performance shares will be earned based on the Company’s EBITDA performance and will vest one year after the date on which the Committee certifies the EBITDA achievement level, subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through such date.

(3)    These amounts represent shares of time-based restricted stock granted. These shares vest 50% in February 2015 and 50% in February 2016, except for Mr. Fievez whose shares will all vest in February 2016.

(4)    The amounts shown in this column are valued based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and, in the case of the performance shares, are based upon the probable outcome of the applicable performance conditions. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 for a discussion of the relevant assumptions used in calculating the amounts.



24


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2014

2016
The following table provides information regarding unvested stock awards held by each of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2014.

 
     
Name

 
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
 
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)(6)
     
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 83,434

(1)  
3,529,258
Jeffrey A. Cook 28,456
(2) 
1,203,689
Stephen D. Dunmead 41,417
(3)��
1,751,939
Michel Fievez 14,300
(4) 
604,890
Greerson G. McMullen 15,755
(5) 
666,437
______2016.
NameNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)
Market Value Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(8)
  
Frédéric P. Villoutreix
53,187(1)
2,421,604
Allison Aden
6,238(2)
284,016
Michel Fievez
8,607(3)
391,877
Daniel Lister
1,0484)
47,715
Robert Cardin
13,292(5)
605,185
Greerson G. McMullen
–(6)
–
Donald Meltzer
1,064(7)
48,444
_______________
(1)Includes 67,51129,823 shares earned based on the achievement of performance objectives which vested on February 27, 2015, 7,76125, 2017, 23,364 shares earned based on the achievement of performance objectives which will vest in February 2016 and 8,162 shares (4,081(8,317 of which vested on February 26, 201524, 2017, 6,730 of which vested on February 25, 2017 and 4,0818,317 of which will vest inon February 2016)24, 2018), in each case subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
(2)
(2)Includes 2,000 shares that will vest on December 21, 2019 and 4,238 shares (2,119 of which vested on February 24, 2017 and 2,119 of which will vest on February 24, 2018), in each case subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
(3)Includes 14,9334,517 shares earned based on the achievement of performance objectives which vested on February 27, 2015, 1,71725, 2017, 2,038 shares earned basedwhich vested on the achievement of performance objectives whichFebruary 25, 2017, but will vest incontinue to be subject to restrictions on transfer pursuant to requirements under French law until February 2016, 1,8062019, and 2,052 shares (903(1,026 of which vested on February 26, 201524, 2017 and 9031,026 of which will vest inon February 2016)24, 2018), and 10,000 shares which will vest in February 2016, in each case subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
(3)
(4)		Includes 24,4871,048 shares (524 of which vested on February 24, 2017 and 524 of which will vest on February 24, 2018), subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
(5)
Includes 1,163 shares earned based on the achievement of performance objectives which vested on February 27, 2015, 3,37825, 2017, 263 shares earned basedwhich vested on the achievement of performance objectives which will vest in February 2016, 3,55225, 2017, 866 shares (1,776(433 of which vested on February 26, 201524, 2017 and 1,776433 of which will vest inon February 2016)24, 2018), and 10,0005,000 shares which will vest in March 2017,on January 4, 2020 and 6,000 shares which will vest on August 31, 2018, in each case subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.
(6)In connection with Mr. McMullen’s separation from the Company, he forfeited his outstanding equity awards.
(4)
(7)		Includes 11,4781,064 shares earned based on achievement of performance objectives which vested on February 27, 2015, but will be subject to restrictions on transfer pursuant to requirements under French law until February24, 2017 1,376 shares earned based onfor which the achievementcondition of performance objectives which will vest in February 2016, but be subject to restrictions on transfer pursuant to requirements under French law until February 2018, and 1,446 shares which will vest in February 2016 (subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through vesting date), but will be subject to restrictions on transfer pursuant to requirements under French law until February 2018.
(5)
Includes 6,356 shares earned based on the achievement of performance objectives which vested February 27, 2015, 1,169 shares earned based on the achievement of performance objectives which will vest February 2016, 1,230 shares (615 of which vested February 26, 2015 and 615 of which will vest in February 2016), and 7,000 shares which will vest in May 2017, in each case subject to the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment through the applicable vesting date.date was waived.
(6)
(8)		Value calculated using the December 31, 201430, 2016 closing share price of $42.30.$45.53.

30



25


20142016 STOCK VESTED TABLE

The following table provides information concerning each vesting of stock during 20142016 for each of the Named Executive Officers.
 
Name 
Number of
 Shares
 Acquired
 on
 Vesting
 (#)
 
Value
 Realized
 on
 Vesting
 ($)
 Number of
Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)		 Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)
  
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 73,566 3,481,879 18,572 570,406
Jeffrey A. Cook 14,940 707,110
Stephen D. Dunmead 0 0
 
Allison Aden – –
 
Michel Fievez 0 0 2,822 86,325
 
Daniel Lister – –
 
Robert Cardin 884 27,100
 
Greerson G. McMullen 0 0 2,798 85,936
 
Donald Meltzer – –




20142016 PENSION BENEFITS

The following table provides information regarding Mr. Fievez’s pension benefits under the SWM-France defined contribution retirement plan.

   
Name Plan 
Number of Years of Credited Service
(#)
 
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit
($)
 
Payments During Last Fiscal Year
($)
 Plan Number of Years of Credited Service(#) Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) Payments During Last Fiscal Year
    
Michel Fievez SWM-France defined contribution retirement plan 3.5 35,853
 0 Luxembourg Pension 1.3 18,460 –
 

SWM France Defined Contribution Retirement Plan
 

5.5
 

42,853
 

–

Mr. Fievez participates in the Company’s supplemental defined pension contribution plan (Article 83 scheme) for FrenchLuxembourg employees, which was adopted during 2012.2016. This is a hybridsocial supplemental plan that provides annuitized income to the participant upon retirement, in addition to the standard insured social retirement benefit. The present value of contributions accrued for his benefit, shown in dollars, was converted from Euros at the December 31, 20142016 exchange rate of 1.2136.1.0568.
Prior to his relocation to Luxembourg, Mr. Fievez also benefits from the Company’s contributions toparticipated in a national retirement arrangementsarrangement required by French law. In connection with his relocation, Mr. Fievez’s plan under French law (that is,was frozen until Mr. Fievez recommenced active participation in the French Social Security, ARRCO and AGIRC).plan or until his eligible retirement under French law.


2631


20142016 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table provides information regarding compensation that has been deferred by our Named Executive Officers pursuant to the terms of our Deferred Compensation Plan.

 
 
Name 
Executive contributions in last FY
($)(1)
 
Registrant contributions in last FY
($)(1)(2)
 
Aggregate earnings in last FY
($)
 
Aggregate balance at last FYE
($)
 
Executive contributions in last FY ($)(1)
 
Registrant contributions in last FY ($)(2)
 Aggregate earnings in last FY ($) Aggregate balance at last FYE ($)
         
Frédéric P. Villoutreix 169,531 101,719 129,821 1,738,355 136,687
 116,316
 208,623
 2,401,413
Jeffrey A. Cook 39,275 23,565 10,599 116,926
Stephen D. Dunmead 165,136 41,482 17,643 317,224
Allison Aden 51,988
 11,594
 2,040
 65,622
Michel Fievez 0 0 0 0 —
 —
 —
 —
Daniel Lister —
 —
 —
 —
Robert Cardin 121,799
 17,388
 28,574
 282,950
Greerson G. McMullen 187,124 34,515 19,642 317,747 122,948
 —
 38,578
 651,780
Donald Meltzer 83,357
 —
 6,073
 117,120
_______________________
(1)
All contributions in 20142016 relating to 20142016 compensation were reported as compensation in the 20142016 Summary Compensation Table. Contributions expensed in arelating to prior yearyears are not included.included as 2016 compensation.
(2)
Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan were 401(k) savings plan contributions that exceeded IRS limitations on qualified plan contributions.

Eligible employees may elect to defer up to 25% of their annual salary and up to 50% of their incentive bonus to the Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan established in 2005 to allow participants to defer receipt of compensation and payment of certain income taxes. Eligibility to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan is limited to “management” and “highly compensated employees” as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The Company may, with Committee approval, make cash contributions to a participant’s account in the Deferred Compensation Plan.

Amounts deferred into the Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 by a participating officer, or contributed on the officer’s behalf by the Company, can be invested at the officer’s election in an account that tracks, but does not actually invest in, some of the fund elections available under the Company’s 401(k) savings plan. The participating officer bears the investment risk. The Company makes no guaranty as to the return of the principal amount of any funds deferred or of any income thereon. The funds remain subject to the Company’s creditors while in the Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2.

A participant may elect to receive payment of the vested amount credited to his or her deferral account under the Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 based on a participant election of a single lump sum or three, five, or ten annual installments. No payments may commence in fewer than five years following the date of the deferral election, except for alternative distributions that may occur in certain defined circumstances including disability, death of participant, separation from service, change of control and unforeseeable emergency, as such terms are defined in the plan. Certain individuals, including plan participants who are Named Executive Officers, must defer distributions from the plan for six months following a separation from service.


2732


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

TheOn November 2, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board adopted and approved the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. 2016 Executive Severance Plan (the “2016 Plan”) for members of the Company’s senior executive team. New members of the Company’s senior executive team will be covered by the 2016 Plan, while certain grandfathered executive officers will remain covered by the Company’s 2012 Executive Severance Plan (the “2012 Plan”) or the Company’s Executive Severance Plan, as amended and restated in 2008 (the “Severance“2008 Plan”). While many of the terms remained the same as the 2012 Plan, the 2016 Plan provides that any benefits triggered by a change of control are subject to an automatic reduction to avoid the imposition of excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code in the event such reduction would result in a better after-tax result for the executive. Mr. Villoutreix remains the only Named Executive Officer eligible to receive a 280G tax gross-up under the Company’s legacy compensation arrangements. Messrs. Cardin and Lister participate in the 2016 Plan, Ms. Aden participates in the 2012 Plan and Messrs. Villoutreixand Fievez participate in the 2008 Plan.
The Company’s severance plans provide that in the event of termination of a participant’s employment with the Company or one of its Frenchparticipating subsidiaries or business units for any reason other than cause, retirement, disability or death within two years after a change of control of the Company, a participant will be entitled to salary and benefit continuation. A change of control is defined as the date as of which: (a) a third person, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, acquires actual or beneficial ownership of shares of the Company having 30% or more of the total number of votes that may be cast for the election of directors of the Company; or (b) as the result of any cash tender or exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets or contested election, or any combination of the foregoing transactions (a “Transaction”), the persons who were directors of the Company before the Transaction shall cease to constitute a majority of the Board of the Company or any successor to the Company.

In the event of termination as a result of a change of control as of December 31, 2016, certain of the Named Executive Officers employed in the United States (Messrs. Villoutreix, Fievez, Cardin and Lister and Ms. Aden) would begenerally have been entitled to receive:
i. a cash payment in an amount equal to three times the highest annual compensation (base salary and annual incentive awards) paid or payable within the three year period ending on the date of termination; and
i.a cash payment in an amount equal to three times the highest annual compensation (base salary and annual incentive awards) paid or payable within the three year period ending on the date of termination; and
ii.health and dentalii. welfare benefits (including, health and dental benefits) from the Company for a period of 3 years.

A participant employed by one of the Company’s Frenchnon-United States subsidiaries or business units is entitled to essentially the same payments and benefits as a United States participant, subject to certain adjustments which take into account the differences between the respective compensation, benefit and pension plans and programs in the United States and France.

the participant’s place of employment.
Upon a change of control, all restricted stock and stock options granted under the Company’s Restricted Stock Plan and corporate deferred compensation plan contributions that have been granted, but not yet vested as of December 31, 2016, vest automatically. Awards granted under the Company’s 2015 LTIP are subject to double trigger vesting upon a change of control – meaning that both a qualifying termination of employment and a change of control must occur prior to the accelerated vesting of such awards. Under the AIP,Company’s annual incentive program, in the event the participant is terminated without cause within two years following a change of control, the participant is entitled to payment of a pro rata portion of the incentive award at the target performance percentage, without regard to achievement of pre-established objectives.

For participants added before 2012, the Company shall pay the participant an additional gross-up payment to compensate such participant for the excise tax liability under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, this provision applies to Mr. Villoutreix, but has been eliminated for individuals who commenced participation on or after February 23, 2012, including Messrs. Cook, Dunmead and McMullen.

The Severance Planseverance plans also providesprovide that if a Named Executive Officer’s employment with the Company or an affiliate terminates for a reason other than death, retirement, disability, voluntary resignation or cause, in each case, absent a change of control, the Company will pay the Named Executive Officer an amount equal to onea severance multiple determined by the Committee at the time the individual is selected for participation. In the case of Messrs. Cardin and Lister, this severance multiple equals one-half times, or,in the case of Ms. Aden and Mr. Fievez, this multiple equals one-times and, in the case of Mr. Villoutreix, this severance multiple equals two times his base salary, payable as a cash lump sum. The Severance Plan does notseverance plans also provide for additionalthe continuation of the Company’s welfare benefits in this circumstance.for the number of years equal to the severance multiple. A participant cannot receive both this payment as well as

33


compensation under the Severance Plan’sseverance plans’ change of control provisions. Named Executive Officers, other than Mr. Fievez, are also eligible to receive one-year of salary continuation in the event of death or disability.

In the case of Messrs. Cardin and Lister, the continuation multiple equals one-half times and, in the case of Mr. Villoutreix and Ms. Aden, this continuation multiple equals one times base salary, payable as a cash lump sum.
The Committee establishes the eligibility criteria for participation and, from time to time, designates key employees as participants in the Severance2016 Plan. Subject to certain conditions, the Severance2016 Plan may be amended or terminated by resolution of the Board, but no such amendment or termination shall be effective during the two-year period following a change of control of the Company without the consent of all participants.

In addition, in the event of termination, retirement, death or disability, the Named Executive Officer is also entitled to his benefits discussed above under “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plans” and “2014“2016 Pension Benefits,” as applicable.

The maximum amounts payable upon termination pursuant to the Severance Plan,applicable severance plan, assuming that a change of control of the Company and/or a qualifying termination of employment had occurred on December 31, 2014,2016, are set forth in the following tables for all Named Executive Officers.Officers other than for Mr. McMullen, who separated from the Company, effective October 23, 2016, and Mr. Meltzer, who separated from the Company, effective December 31, 2016. In connection with Mr. McMullen’s separation from the Company, Mr. McMullen forfeited his 2016 annual incentive award and outstanding equity awards.
As noted above, Mr. Meltzer served as Executive Vice President, Advanced Materials & Structures through July 4, 2016 and as an employee of the Company in the position of Head of Strategy for Advanced Materials & Structures through December 31, 2016. During his service as Head of Strategy for Advanced Materials & Structures, Mr. Meltzer continued to receive his annual base salary and remained eligible to receive his 2016 annual incentive award in accordance with the terms of the 2016 annual incentive program. In addition, in connection with his separation, the Committee waived the service-based vesting requirement under one-half of Mr. Meltzer’s 2016 long-term incentive awards. Pursuant to the terms of the modified award, Mr. Meltzer vested in one-half of the 2016 service-based component of the 2016 long-term incentive awards in February 2017, on the original vesting date of the award (estimated value, based on December 30, 2016 closing price, of $48,444).  Absent this modification, Mr. Meltzer would have forfeited the award upon his separation from the Company. Mr. Meltzer did not receive any additional compensation in connection with his departure from the Company.



2834


Potential Payments to Frédéric P. Villoutreix upon Retirement,

Termination or Change of Control as of December 31, 2014

2016
   
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination Type of Payment 
Early Retirement
($)
 
Normal Retirement
($)
 
Involuntary Not for Cause Termination
($)
 Termination as a Result of Change of Control ($) Death or Disability ($) 


Change of Control
($)
Type of PaymentEarly Retirement ($)Normal Retirement ($)Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)Termination as a Result of Change of Control
($)		Death or Disability ($)Change of Control
($)
 
Compensation:              
 
Base Salary Lump sum cash -- -- 1,560,000 2,340,000

 
 780,000 --Lump sum cash–1,655,0042,482,506703,377–
 
Incentive Compensation
      
 
Short-Term Incentive Lump sum cash -- -- -- 3,510,936

 
 1,170,312

 
--Lump sum cash–4,095,150955,535–
Long-Tern Incentive – Performance Shares Shares -- -- -- 3,786,442

 
 3,786,442 3,786,442
Restricted Stock Shares -- -- -- --   
Benefits and Perquisites:
     
 
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares & Restricted StockShares–2,421,6041,664,258
 
Benefits Perquisites: 
 
Health Care -- -- -- 46,890 -- --–55,800–
 
Dental Care -- -- -- 5,586

 
 -- --–5,804–
 
Disability Benefits -- -- -- 21,480

 
 -- --–19,751–
 
Life Insurance -- -- -- 7,200

 
 -- --– –5,9341,000,000–
Accrued Vacation Pay 4 weeks Lump sum cash -- -- 60,000 180,000 60,000 --
 
Excess 401(k) in Deferred Comp Lump sum benefit 101,719 101,719101,719 101,719

 
 101,719 101,719Lump sum benefit116,316
        
Tag Gross-Ups–878,575–
 
Total Executive Severance 101,719 101,7191,721,719 10,000,253

 
 5,898,473 3,888,161 116,3164,192,92410,081,4405,196,8321,780,574




2935


Potential Payments to Jeffrey A. CookAllison Aden upon Retirement,

Termination or Change of Control as of December 31, 2014

2016
 
 
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination Type of Payment 
Early Retirement
($)
 
Normal Retirement
($)
 
Involuntary Not for Cause Termination
($)
 
Termination as a Result of Change of Control
($)
 
Death or Disability
($)
 


Change of Control
($)
Type of PaymentEarly Retirement ($)Normal Retirement ($)Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)Termination as a Result of Change of Control
($)		Death or Disability ($)Change of Control
($)
 
Compensation:    
 
Base Salary Lump sum cash -- -- 345,050 1,035,150 345,050 --Lump sum cash–440,0001,320,000374,000–
Incentive Compensation:
   
Short Term Incentive Lump sum cash -- -- -- 908,097 302,699 --
Long Term Incentive – Performance Shares Shares -- -- -- 749,189 749,189 749,189
 
Incentive Compensation 
 
Short-Term IncentiveLump sum cash–1,149,015268,104–
 
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares & Restricted StockShares–96,478–
 
Restricted Stock Shares -- -- -- 250,850 250,850 250,850Shares–22,765–91,060–
Benefits and Perquisites:   
 
Benefits Perquisites: 
 
Health Care -- -- -- 51,885 -- --–32,400–
 
Dental Care -- -- -- 5,586 -- --–1,626–
 
Disability Benefits -- -- -- 23,532 -- --–14,723–
 
Life Insurance -- -- -- 3,600 -- --– –1,860500,000–
Accrued Vacation Pay – 4 weeks Lump sum cash -- -- 26,542 79,626 26,542 --
 
Excess 401(k) in Deferred Comp Lump sum benefit 23,565 23,565 23,565 23,565 23,565 23,565Lump sum benefit11,594
  
Total Executive Severance 23,565 23,565 395,157 3,131,080 1,697,895 1,023,604 11,594570,8372,627,6961,341,23611,594


36



30


Potential Payments to Stephen D. DunmeadMichel Fievez upon Retirement,

Termination or Change of Control as of December 31, 2014

2016(1)
 
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination Type of Payment 
Early Retirement
($)
 
Normal Retirement
($)
 
Involuntary Not for Cause Termination
($)
 
Termination as a Result of Change of Control
 ($)
 
Death or Disability
($)



Change of Control
($)
Type of PaymentEarly Retirement ($)Normal Retirement ($)Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)Termination as a Result of Change of Control ($)Death or Disability ($)Change of Control ($)
 
Compensation:             
 
Base Salary Lump sum cash -- -- 485,000 1,455,000 485,000--Lump sum cash–397,2841,191,852–
 
Incentive Compensation:          
 
Short-Term Incentive Lump sum cash -- -- -- 1,384,092 461,364--Lump sum cash–1,170,969390,323–
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares Shares -- -- -- 1,228,513 1,228,5131,228,513
Restricted Stock Shares -- -- -- 501,700 501,700501,700
 
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares & Restricted StockShares–391,877252,054
 
Benefits and Perquisites:          
 
Health Care -- -- -- 79,890 ---- –3,71911,157–
 
Dental Care -- -- -- 5,586 ---- –
 
Disability Benefits -- -- -- 17,958 ---- – –
 
Life Insurance -- -- -- 3,600 ---- –6,43619,308–
Accrued Vacation Pay 4 weeks Lump sum cash -- -- 37,308 111,924 37,308--
Excess 401(k) in Deferred Comp Lump sum benefit 41,482 41,482 41,482 41,482 41,48241,482
 
Accrued Vacation PayLump sum cash–33,10799,32133,107–
 
Additional payment based on participation in Luxembourg defined contribution pension plan (mandated pension plan)Lump sum benefit19,50958,52619,509
          
Total Executive Severance 41,482 41,482 563,790 4,829,745 2,755,3671,771,695 19,509411,386851,9322,943,010834,816271,563
_______________
(1)Mr. Fievez’s compensation is paid in Euros. The amounts reported in this column have been converted at the December 31, 2016 exchange rate of 1.0568 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2016.


3137


Potential Payments to Michel FievezDaniel Lister upon Retirement,

Termination or Change of Control as of December 31, 2014(1)2016
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon TerminationType of PaymentEarly Retirement ($)Normal Retirement ($)Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)Termination as a Result of Change of Control ($)Death or Disability ($)Change of Control ($)
        
Compensation:       
        
Base SalaryLump sum cash––212,5001,275,000212,500–
        
Incentive Compensation       
        
Short-Term IncentiveLump sum cash–––376,25487,793–
        
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares & Restricted StockShares–––23,85823,858–
        
Benefits Perquisites:       
        
Health Care–––13,94483,664––
        
Dental Care–––9675,804––
        
Disability Benefits–––2,45414,723––
        
Life Insurance– –3101,860500,000–
        
Excess 401(k) in Deferred CompLump sum benefit––––––
        
Total Executive Severance ––230,1751,781,163824,151–

38
               
               
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination Type of Payment 
Early Retirement
($)
 
Normal Retirement
($)
 
Involuntary Not for Cause Termination
($)
 
Termination as a Result of Change of Control
($)
 
Death or Disability
($)
 


Change of Control
($)
Compensation:              
               
Base Salary Lump sum cash -- -- 405,628 1,216,883 -- --
               
Incentive Compensation:              
               
Short-Term Incentive Lump sum cash -- -- -- 764,950 210,105 --
               
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares Shares -- -- -- 575,851 575,851 575,851
               
Restricted Stock Shares -- -- -- -- -- --
               
Benefits and Perquisites:              
               
Health Care   -- -- 1,051 3,154 -- --
               
Dental Care   -- -- -- -- -- --
               
Disability Benefits   -- -- -- -- -- --
               
Life Insurance   -- -- 4,128 12,384 -- --
               
Accrued Vacation Pay Lump sum cash -- -- 33,802 101,407 33,802 --
               
Supplemental private defined contribution plan Lump sum benefit 35,853 35,853 35,853 35,853 35,853 --
               
Additional payment based on Participation' (mandated PS) Lump sum benefit 33,707 33,707 33,707 33,707 33,707 --
               
Additional payment based on Interessement' (Gain sharing) Lump sum benefit 5,416 5,416 5,416 5,416 5,416 --
               
Total Executive Severance   74,976 74,976 519,585 2,749,605 894,734 575,851


________

(1) Mr. Fievez’s compensation is paid in Euros. The amounts reported in this column have been converted at the December 31,
2014 exchange rate of 1.2136 Euros to the U.S. dollar for 2014.



32


Potential Payments to Greerson G. McMullenRobert Cardin upon Retirement,

Termination or Change of Control as of December 31, 2014

2016
 
Executive Benefits and Payments Upon Termination Type of Payment Early Retirement ($) Normal Retirement ($) Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($) 
Termination as a Result of Change of Control
($)
 
Death or Disability
($)


Change of Control
($)
 Type of PaymentEarly Retirement ($)Normal Retirement ($)Involuntary Not for Cause Termination ($)Termination as a Result of Change of Control ($)Death or Disability ($)Change of Control ($)
 
Compensation:            
 
Base Salary Lump sum cash -- -- 470,000 1,410,000 470,000-- Lump sum cash–155,889935,331155,889–
 
Incentive Compensation:            
 
Short-Term Incentive Lump sum cash -- -- -- 840,744 280,248-- Lump sum cash–901,659210,387–
Long-Term Incentive – Performance Shares Shares -- -- -- 318,881 318,881318,881 
 
Long-Term
Incentive – Performance Shares& Restricted Shares
Shares–84,64064,926
 
Restricted Stock Shares -- -- -- 351,190 351,190351,190 Shares–126,673–500,830–
 
Benefits and Perquisites:            
 
Health Care -- -- -- 79,020 ----  –13,94483,664–
 
Dental Care -- -- -- 5,586 ----  –5923,554–
 
Disability Benefits -- -- -- 17,466 ----  –2,12112,725–
 
Life Insurance -- -- -- 3,600 ----  –3101,860500,000–
Accrued Vacation Pay 4 weeks Lump sum cash -- -- 36,154 108,462 36,154-- 
 
Excess 401(k) in Deferred Comp Lump sum benefit 34,515 34,515 34,515 34,515 34,51534,515 Lump sum benefit17,388
            
Total Executive Severance 34,515 34,515 540,669 3,169,464 1,490,988704,586  17,388401,5572,040,8211,469,13482,314
 




3339


Compensation of Directors

20142016 Compensation of Directors

Every other year, the Compensation Committee reviews pay to outsidenon-employee directors to evaluate whether non-employee director compensation is consistent with market practices. In 2013,2015, the Compensation Committee retained Willis Towers Watson, anthe Committee’s independent compensation consultant, to perform an Outside Director Pay Review based on publicly stated non-employee director compensation at the same peer group of companies examined in the 2013 executive competitive compensation analysis. The 2015 pay review concluded that total non-employee director compensation at the Company ranked at approximately the 38th25th percentile of peers and was 11%13% below the peers on a dollar value basis. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee determined, in consultation with Willis Towers Watson, to recommend to the Board that non-employee director compensation be brought closer to the targeted market median. Based on such recommendation, the Board determined that non-employee directors willwould receive the following compensation for their service on the Board and its committees, for the January 1, 20142016 - December 31, 2015 period:2017 period.
An annual Board retainer of $80,000 in stock plus $60,000 in cash. Stock grants are paid quarterly, with valuations based on the closing price on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date.
•An annual Board retainer of $75,000 in stock plus $45,000 in cash.  Stock grants are paid quarterly, with valuations based on the closing price on the trading day immediately preceding the grant date.
•PayAdditional pay for the lead non-management director is $20,000 per year.
•Directors who serve on committees receive an annual retainer, paid quarterly as follows:
•Directors who serve on committees receive an additional annual retainer, paid quarterly as follows:
Audit Committee: $30,000 for Chair; $15,000 for other members
•Compensation Committee: $20,000 for Chair; $10,000 for other members
•Nominating & Governance Committee: $15,000 for Chair; $10,000 for other members

A director who is an officer or an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates does not receive any fees for service as a member of the Board, but is reimbursed for expenses incurred as a result of such service. Each non-employee director other than Frédéric Villoutreix, earned the following compensation in 20142016 in addition to reimbursement of his or her actual and reasonable travel expenses.

Name(1)
 
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($)
 

Stock Awards
($)(1)
 

Total
($)
 Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) 
Stock Awards ($)(2)
 Total
      
Claire L. Arnold 
$65,000
 
$75,000
 
$140,000
 
$80,000
 
$80,000
 
$160,000
      
K.C. Caldabaugh 
$75,000
 
$75,000
 
$150,000
 
$90,000
 
$80,000
 
$170,000
      
William A. Finn 
$75,674
 
$75,000
 
$150,674
 
$85,000
 
$80,000
 
$165,000
Heinrich Fischer(2)
 
$37,775
 
$51,511
 
$89,286
Robert McCullough(2)
 
$23,696
 
$23,696
 
$47,392
John D. Rogers 
$72,000
 
$75,000
 
$147,000
Anderson D. Warlick 
$78,737
 
$75,000
 
$153,737
      
Heinrich Fischer 
$70,000
 
$80,000
 
$150,000
      
Jeffrey K. Keenan(3)
 
$65,334
 
$67,912
 
$133,246
      
John D. Rogers(4)
 
$103,846
 
$80,000
 
$183,846
      
Anderson D. Warlick(4)
 
$86,154
 
$80,000
 
$166,154
_________________________
(1)Frédéric Villoutreix is not included in this table as he is an employee of the Company and receives no additional compensation for his service as a director. The 2016 compensation received by Mr. Villoutreix as an employee of the Company is shown in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table.
(1)
(2)
As of December 31, 2014,2016, the total number of stock awards outstanding per director, in the form of shares or share units, were as follows: Ms. Arnold 54,872;64,763; Mr. Caldabaugh 30,611;37,131; Mr. Finn 19,016;23,423; Mr. Fischer 1,216;5,275; Mr. McCullough 0;Keenan 3,959; Mr. Rogers 14,77120,103 and Mr. Warlick 15,609.25,408. These totals also include accumulated dividends on stock unitsunits.

40


(2)
(3)		Mr. McCullough resigned from the Board, effective March 14, 2014, and Mr. FischerKeenan was electedappointed to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee, both effective April 24, 2014. The feesas of February 25, 2016, and the Nominating & Governance Committee, effective November 1, 2016, and received by both of these directors in 2014 were prorated to reflect their respectivecash compensation for his service in 2014.on each committee, respectively.

(4)Effective April 2016, Mr. Rogers succeeded Mr. Warlick as the lead non-management director, and each of Messrs. Rogers and Warlick received prorated cash compensation for his service as lead non-management director, respectively.
U.S. directors may elect to defer all or part of their compensation to the Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 for Non-Employee Directors, a non-qualified, deferred compensation plan established in 2005 to allow participants to defer receipt of compensation and payment of certain federal and state income taxes. Each participating director has an individual deferral account that is credited with cash or stock units, which include accumulated dividends. Cash credits accrue market-based investment earnings. The stock units do not have any voting rights. Because of regulatory changes, Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 replaced the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors in effect from 2000 to 2004, which operated in a similar manner. The earlier plan was frozen as of December 31, 2004 to stop the accrual of additional unvested benefits, other than market-based investment earnings or losses on individual account balances as of that date. The Company provides no guaranty of repayment of the principal amount deferred or of any earnings on the participants’ account balances in either plan.

3441


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors and Standing Committees

Board Leadership Structure

The Board is led by the Chairman of the Board (the "Chairman"“Chairman”) and; currently, that person is also the Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that whether to have the sameone person should simultaneously occupy the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be decideddetermined by the Board in its business judgment, periodically, in particularon a periodic basis, including at any time there is a vacancy in either position, after considering relevant factors at the time, includingsuch as the specific needs of the business and what is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Company believes that Mr. Villoutreix possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing the Company and its businesses and is thus best positioned to ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters facing the Company. Mr. Villoutreix’s combined role also ensures clear accountability and enhances the Company’s ability to communicate its message and strategy clearly and consistently. When the same person holds the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles or when the Chairman is not independent, the independent directors elect a Lead Non-Management Director for a two-year term, and after which timetwo of such terms, he or she becomes ineligible to stand for re-election to that position for at least one term. On April 24, 2014, Anderson21, 2016, John D. WarlickRogers was elected for a two-year term as the Lead Non-Management Director.

The Chairman collaborates with the Lead Non-Management Director in establishing the Board’s meeting schedule and agenda.agendas. The Lead Non-Management Director presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present and at all executive sessions of the non-management or independent directors. The Lead Non-ManagementNon‑Management Director has the authority to call meetings of the non-management or independent directors. The Lead Non-Management Director acts as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors.

The Lead Non-Management Director or non-management directors as a group can retain such independent expertiseexperts they deem to be necessary or desirable, with the costs borne by the Company. There is also total freedom of communication between any director and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and any other member of management, and such communications are not required to go through the Lead Non-Management Director or the Chairman, in the case of director communication with other members of management. The Lead Non-Management Director will be available for consultation and direct communication if requested by any major stockholder of the Company.

The Board has functioned with this structure and in this manner for a number of years and has to-date found that it provides an appropriate balance to the functioning of the Board in addressing its oversight functions, consideration and understanding of the tactical and strategic matters that must be understood and addressed by the Board and between the respective interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Director Independence

The Board unanimously adopted the following standard for director independence at its December 2002 meeting:

An independent director is a person who is free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Annually the Board will assess the independence of each non-management director based on the existence or absence of a material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). The following persons shall not be considered independent:
a.    A director who is employed by the Company or any of its affiliates for the current year or any of the past five years.
b.    A director who is, or in the past five years has been, affiliated with or employed by a (present or former) auditor of the Company (or of an affiliate).

42

a.A director who is employed by the Company or any of its affiliates for the current year or any of the past five (5) years.

c.    A director who is, or in the past five years has been, part of an interlocking directorate in which an executive officer of the Company serves on the compensation committee of another company that concurrently employs the director.
b.A director who is, or in the past five (5) years has been, affiliated with or employed by a (present or former) auditor of the Company (or of an affiliate).
d.    A director who is, or in the past five years has been, a Family Member of an individual who was employed by the Company or any of its affiliates as an executive officer. The term “Family Member” shall mean a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than household employees) who shares such person’s home.
e.    A director who, during the current fiscal year or any of the past five fiscal years, personally provided services to the Company or its affiliates that had an annual value in excess of $60,000; or who was paid or accepted, or who has a non-employee Family Member who was paid or accepted, any payments from the Company or any of its affiliates in excess of $60,000 other than compensation for board service, benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non‑discretionary compensation.
c.A director who is, or in the past five (5) years has been, part of an interlocking directorate in which an executive officer of the Company serves on the compensation committee of another company that concurrently employs the director.
d.A director who is, or in the past five (5) years has been, a Family Member of an individual who was employed by the Company or any of its affiliates as an executive officer. The term “Family Member” shall mean a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than household employees) who shares such person’s home.

35

e.A director who, during the current fiscal year or any of the past five (5) fiscal years, personally provided services to the Company or its affiliates that had an annual value in excess of $60,000; or who was paid or accepted, or who has a non-employee Family Member who was paid or accepted, any payments from the Company or any of its affiliates in excess of $60,000 other than compensation for board service, benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan, or non-discretionary compensation.
f.f.    A director who is a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive officer of, any organization (profit or non-profit) to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments (other than those arising solely from investments in the Company’s securities) that exceed one percent (1%) of the recipient’s annual consolidated gross revenues in the current year or any of the past five (5) fiscal years; unless, for provisions (e) and (f), the Board expressly determines in its business judgment that the relationship does not interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment.

Based on the foregoing standard, andas well as the applicable standards for independence articulated by the NYSE and the SEC, the Board affirmatively determined by resolution dated February 26, 2015 that the following current and former directors who collectively constitute 85.7% ofand director nominee met the full Board and represent 100% of the membership of the Standing Committees, are independent:applicable independence standards:
Claire L. ArnoldJeffrey J. Keenan
  
          Claire L. Arnold
K.C. Caldabaugh
Marco Levi
William A. Finn
Heinrich Fischer
John D. Rogers
Heinrich FischerAnderson D. Warlick

Prior to Robert McCullough ceasing to serve as a director on March 14, 2014, the Board had determined that he was an independent director under the applicable independence standards as well. Mr. Villoutreix is a member of management and is not independent.

Financial Experts

The Board affirmatively determined by resolution, dated February 26, 2015,23, 2017, that Ms. Arnold and Messrs. Caldabaugh, Finn, Keenan and Rogers each qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Standing Committees

TheEach of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee are the threeis a “Standing Committees”Committee” of the Board. Each Standing Committee is composed entirely of independent directors.

The following table lists the current members, principal functions and meetings held in 20142016 for each of the Standing Committees:

43




MembersPrincipal FunctionsMeetings in 2016
   
MembersPrincipal FunctionsMeetings in 2014
Audit Committee
John D. Rogers (Chair)
K.C. Caldabaugh
William A. Finn
Jeffrey J. Keenan

No member serves on the audit committee of more than three public companies, including the Company’s Audit Committee.

•
Recommend to the Board the appointment of outside auditors to audit the records and accounts of the Company
9
•    Retain and compensate outside auditors
•    Review scope of audits, provide oversight in connection with internal control, financial reporting and disclosure systems
•    Monitor the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
•    The nature and scope of the Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in further detail under the caption “Audit Committee Report”8


36

 
   
Compensation Committee
Claire L. Arnold (Chair)
Heinrich FischerWilliam A. Finn
Anderson D. Warlick
•    Evaluate and approve executive officer compensation
9
•    Review compensation strategy, plans and programs and evaluate related risk
•    Evaluate and make recommendations on director compensation
•    The nature and scope of the Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in further detail under the caption “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” 3
   
Nominating & Governance Committee
K.C. Caldabaugh (Chair)
William A. FinnJeffrey J. Keenan
Anderson D. Warlick
 
7
•    Review and recommend to the Board candidates for election by stockholders or to fill any vacancies on the Board; evaluate stockholder nominees
•    Oversee the Board, Board Committee and individual director evaluation processes
•    Evaluate, monitor and recommend changes in the Company’s governance policies
•    Oversee and report to the Board on the succession planning process with respect to directors and the Chief Executive Officer, including review of a transition plan in the event of an unexpected departure or incapacity of the Chief Executive Officer 6

Director Attendance

The Board met seven7 times in 2014.2016. No director then in office attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which the director served.

The Company encourages members of the Board to attend each Annual Meeting and all of theseven directors who were then in office attended the Annual Meeting held on April 24, 2014.21, 2016.

44


Director Training

From time to time, the directors participate in the Company’s compliance training programs and in programs directed specifically to the due and proper execution of their duties as directors. In 2012, the Board adopted a Policy on Orientation and Continuing Education for Board Members as part of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. The policy requires orientation for new directors and ongoing presentations and training for existing directors, as well as periodic reports on continuing education to the Nominating & Governance Committee.

Board Exercise of Risk Oversight

The Board exercises oversight of enterprise risk at a number of levels and utilizes formal and informal mechanisms to do so.

The Audit Committee plays a material role in oversight of financial, disclosure and liquidity risk issues as well as being the main overseer ofand oversees the internal control mechanisms used by management in both the financial and non-financial areas. Aspects of risk review occur at virtuallyVirtually every Audit Committee meeting includes items relating to risk review, including ongoing review of financial results, control issues, compliance audit processes and results, debt covenant compliance, hedging activities and liquidity measures. The Audit Committee has regular interaction with the Company’s independent auditors throughout the year, including executive sessions to address internal control and other matters.

The Nominating & Governance Committee regularly assesses the Company’s governance controls. It also undertakes an ongoing review of succession planning, including to assure an appropriate process exists to find appropriately qualified replacement directors as needed for the Board and its committees and to maintain the continuity of management.

The Compensation Committee assesses compensation design and levels from the perspectives of market reasonableness and appropriateness to the objectives of retaining the quantity and level of management expertise and depth required for the successful execution of the Company’s business goals. The Compensation Committee also assesses the risk posed by the Company’s compensation program design and practices and the probability that they might result in adverse impacts on the Company.


37

The Board as a whole regularly reviews financial performance and risks to that performance, competitive market situations, risks to operations and operating capabilities, regulatory change and strategic planning. These reviews are provided through regularly scheduled financial and operations reviews as well as through theand regular Committee Chair reports to the Board that also occur on a regular basis.Board. More in-depth reviews are provided periodically on selected topics, e.g., litigation and regulatory compliance, customer satisfaction and performance assessments and strategic planning. In 2011, the Company created an internal audit department, and in 2013, the Company established an Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM"(“ERM”) function to oversee the development, implementation and ongoing refinement of a comprehensive ERM program.

Corporate Governance Documents

We have adopted a code of conduct or the Code(the “Code of Conduct,Conduct”) that applies to all of our directors, officers and U.S. employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Conduct is posted on the Governance page of the Company’s website athttp://www.swmintl.comwww.s http://www.swmintl.com/our-company/governancewmintl.com/our-company/governance. To the extent required under applicable SEC and NYSE rules, any waivers of, or changes to, the Code of Conduct will be posted on our website or otherwise publicly disclosed. In addition, copies of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters for each of the Standing Committees can also be found on the Governance page of the Company’s website athttp://www.swmintl.comwww.swmintl.com/our-company/governance. In addition, the Company’s Standard for Director Independence is available on the Governance page of the Company’s website at http://www.swmintl.com/our-company/governance. Copies of these documents may also be obtained by directing a written request to the Investor Relations Department at Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., 100 North Point Center East, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022.

45


Transactions with Related Persons

The Board has adopted written policies and procedures for the review, approval or ratification of any transaction involving an amount in excess of $120,000 in which the Company was or is to be a participant and in which any director or executive officer of the Company, any nominee for director, or any immediate family member of the foregoing has or will have a material interest as contemplated by Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K (“Related(each such transaction, a “Related Person Transactions”Transaction”). Under these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee or a subcommittee of the Board consisting entirely of independent directors reviews the transaction and either approves or rejects the transaction after taking into account the following factors:
Whether the proposed transaction is on terms that are at least as favorable to the Company as those achievable with an unaffiliated third party;
•Whether the proposed transaction is on terms that are at least as favorable to the Company as those achievable with an unaffiliated third party;
•Size of the transaction and amount of consideration;
•Nature of the interest;
•Whether the transaction involves a conflict of interest;
•Whether the transaction involves services available from unaffiliated third parties; and
••    Size of the transaction and amount of consideration;
•    Nature of the interest;
•    Whether the transaction involves a conflict of interest;
•    Whether the transaction involves services available from unaffiliated third parties; and
•    Any other factors that the Audit Committee or subcommittee deems relevant.

The policy does not apply to (a) compensation and related person transactions involving a director or an executive officer solely resulting from that person’s service as a director or employment with the Company so long as the compensation is approved by the Board (or an appropriate committee)committee thereof), (b) transactions involving the rendering of services as a public utility at rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority or (c) any other categories of transactions currently or in the future excluded from the reporting requirements of Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K.

Since January 1, 2014,2016, the Company has not participated in any Related Person Transaction.


38

PROPOSAL TWO
APPROVAL OF 2015 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to approve the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan was approved by the Board on February 26, 2015, subject to stockholder approval, and will replace the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan (the “RSP”). Shares to be issued under the 2015 Plan may be authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock.  As described further below, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan is 5,000,000.As of February 26, 2015, awards for 1,295,590 shares are outstanding under the RSP, comprised of shares of restricted stock (including performance-based restricted stock) that are already issued and are included in our total shares of common stock outstanding. In addition, there were approximately 704,410 shares of Common Stock that remained available for future issuances under the RSP and which will cease to be available for future grants if the 2015 Plan is approved by stockholders. The 2015 Plan, however, will not replace the Company’s Outside Directors’ Stock Plan and awards will continue to be granted under such plan while shares remain available for issuance under that plan. If the 2015 Plan is approved by stockholders, we will continue to be able to make awards of long-term equity incentives, which we believe are critical for attracting, motivating, rewarding and retaining a talented management team who will contribute to our success.

The purposes of the 2015 Plan are to:

align the interests of our stockholders and recipients of awards under the 2015 Plan by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company’s growth and success;

advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining officers, other employees, non-employee directors, consultants, independent contractors and agents of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates; and

motivate award recipients to act in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Under the 2015 Plan, the Company may grant:

non-qualified stock options;

incentive stock options (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”)) (collectively, with non-qualified stock options, “Options”);

stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), in the form of free-standing SARs or SARs granted in tandem with an Option (“Tandem SARs”);

stock awards in the form of restricted stock, restricted stock units, or unrestricted stock awards (“Stock Awards”); and

performance awards.

As of February 26, 2015, approximately 2,930 employees and six non-employee directors would be eligible to participate in the 2015 Plan;however, participation in our RSP has historically been limited to officers and other key employees as selected by the Committee, which, as of February 26, 2015, included approximately 14 officers and other employees.

Plan Highlights

Some of the key features of the 2015 Plan are as follows:

The 2015 Plan will be administered by a committee of the Board (the Compensation Committee) or a subcommittee thereof, comprised entirely of independent directors;

Options and SARs may not be repriced without stockholder approval;

Outstanding Options, SARs, Stock Awards and Performance Awards are subject to double trigger vesting upon a change in control – meaning that both a qualifying termination of employment and a change in control must occur prior to the accelerated vesting of such awards;

Dividend equivalent rights with respect to Options and SARs are prohibited;


39

“Liberal share recycling” is prohibited – meaning that the 2015 Plan does not recycle shares that were not issued or delivered upon the net settlement or net exercise of an Option or SAR, shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the purchase price or withholding taxes relating to an outstanding award or shares repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of an Option exercise;

Under the 2015 Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for awards is 5,000,000; and

Except with respect to substitute awards granted in connection with a corporate transaction or due to a capitalization adjustment, the purchase price of Options and the base price for SARs may not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant.

Description of the 2015 Plan

The following description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the plan document, a copy of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference.

Administration

The 2015 Plan will be administered by a committee (the “Committee”) designated by the Board, or a subcommittee of such committee, consisting of two or more members of the Board, each of whom is intended to be (i) a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, (ii) an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, and (iii) “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. It is currently anticipated that the Compensation Committee will administer the 2015 Plan.

Subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, the Committee will have the authority to select eligible persons to receive awards and determine all of the terms and conditions of each award. The Committee will also have authority to establish rules and regulations for administering the 2015 Plan and to decide questions of interpretation or application of any provision of the 2015 Plan. The Committee may, in its sole discretion and for any reason at any time, take action such that (i) any or all outstanding Options and SARs will become exercisable in part or in full, (ii) all or a portion of the restriction period applicable to any outstanding restricted stock or restricted stock unit award will lapse, (iii) all or a portion of the performance period (if any) applicable to any outstanding restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award or performance award will lapse or (iv) the performance measures (if any) applicable to any outstanding award will be deemed to be satisfied at the target or any other level.

The Committee may delegate some or all of its power and authority under the 2015 Plan to the Board or, subject to applicable law, to the Chief Executive Officer or such other executive officer of the Company as the Committee deems appropriate, except that (i) it may not delegate its power and authority to the Board or the Chief Executive Officer or any other executive officer with regard to awards to persons who are “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code or are likely to become such while an award is outstanding, and (ii) it may not delegate its power and authority to the Chief Executive Officer or any other executive officer with regard to the selection for participation in this Plan of an officer, director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of an award to such an officer, director or other person.

Available Shares

Subject to the capitalization adjustment provisions included in the 2015 Plan, 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock will initially be available for all awards under the 2015 Plan and no more than 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate may be issued under the 2015 Plan in connection with incentive stock options. To the extent the Company grants an Option or a free-standing SAR under the 2015 Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants under the 2015 Plan will be reduced by an amount equal to the number of shares subject to such Option or free-standing SAR. To the extent the Company grants a Stock Award or settles a Performance Award in shares of Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants under the 2015 Plan will be reduced by an amount equal to 3.80 times the number of shares subject to such Stock Award or Performance Award.

Shares of Common Stock subject to an outstanding Option, free-standing SAR, Stock Award or performance award granted under the 2015 Plan, the RSP or any other plan previously maintained by the Company under which equity awards remain outstanding that are not issued or delivered by reason of (i) the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award (excluding shares of Common Stock subject to an Option canceled upon settlement of a related Tandem SAR or subject to a Tandem SAR canceled upon exercise of a related Option), or (ii) the settlement of such award in cash, will again be available under the 2015 Plan. Shares of Common Stock subject to an award under the 2015 Plan will not again be available for issuance under the 2015 Plan if such shares are (a) shares that were subject to an Option or SAR and were not issued or delivered upon the net settlement or net exercise of such

40

Option or SAR, (b) shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the purchase price or withholding taxes relating to an outstanding award or (c) shares repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of an Option exercise.

To the extent necessary for an award to be qualified-performance based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, (i) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Options or SARs or a combination thereof that may be granted during any fiscal year to any person will be 750,000, subject to the capitalization adjustment provisions included in the 2015 Plan, (ii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Stock Awards subject to performance measures or performance awards denominated in shares of Common Stock that may be earned by any person for each 12-month period during a performance period will be 750,000, subject to the capitalization adjustment provisions included in the 2015 Plan, and (iii) the maximum amount that may be earned by any person for each 12-month period during a performance period with respect to performance awards denominated in cash will be $10,000,000; provided, however, that the per person limits included in this sentence will be multiplied by two for awards granted to a participant in the year in which the participant’s employment with the Company commences. The aggregate grant date fair value of shares of Common Stock that may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any non-employee director will not exceed $500,000; provided, however, that (i) the limit included in this sentence will be multiplied by two in the year in which a non-employee director commences service on the Board and (ii) the limit included in this sentence will not apply to awards made pursuant to an election to receive the award in lieu of all or a portion of fees received for service on the Board or any Board committee. On February 26, 2015, the closing sale price per a share of Common Stock as reported on the NYSE was $46.58.

Change in Control

If an award holder’s employment or service is terminated by the Company, a subsidiary or an affiliate without cause, or by the holder for good reason (or otherwise terminates for an eligible reason according to the terms of the applicable Company severance policy or an employment agreement applicable to the holder as of the effective date of a change in control) within twenty-four months following a change in control, then upon such termination of employment or service (i) each outstanding Option and SAR held by such holder will become fully vested and exercisable, (ii) the restriction period applicable to each outstanding Stock Award held by such holder will lapse, and (iii) Performance Awards shall vest or become exercisable or payable in accordance with the applicable award agreement.

Under the terms of the 2015 Plan, a change in control generally means (i) a third person, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, consummates the acquisition of actual or beneficial ownership of shares of the Company having 30% or more of the total number of votes that may be cast for the election of directors of the Board; or (ii) as the result of the consummation of any cash tender or exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets or contested election, or any combination of the foregoing transactions (a “Transaction”), the persons who were directors of the Company before the Transaction cease to constitute a majority of the Board or any successor to the Company.

Effective Date, Termination and Amendment

If approved by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the 2015 Plan will become effective as of the date of such stockholder approval, and will terminate as of the first annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders to occur on or after the tenth anniversary of the effective date, unless earlier terminated by the Board. The Board may amend the 2015 Plan as it deems advisable, subject to stockholder approval if (i) required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including Section 162(m) of the Code, or any rule of the NYSE or (ii) the Board seeks to modify the Option and SAR repricing or discounting provisions in the 2015 Plan. No amendment may materially impair the rights of a holder of an outstanding award without the consent of such holder.

Non-Transferability

The 2015 Plan restricts the ability of an award holder from transferring awards granted under the 2015 Plan other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to beneficiary designation procedures approved by the Company or, to the extent expressly permitted in the award agreement, to the holder’s family members, a trust or entity established by the holder for estate planning purposes or a charitable organization designated by the holder, in each case, without consideration.

Options and SARs

The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options and SARs. The Committee will determine the conditions to the exercisability of each Option and SAR.

Each Option will be exercisable for no more than seven (7)years after its date of grant, unless the Option is an incentive stock option and the optionee owns at the time of grant greater than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all shares of capital stock of the Company (a “ten percent holder”), in which case the Option will be exercisable for no more than five (5) years after its date of grant.

41

The Committee may, in its discretion, establish performance measures which may be satisfied or met, in each case as a condition to the grant or exercisability of an Option. Except in the case of substitute awards granted in connection with a corporate transaction, the purchase price of an Option will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, unless the Option is an incentive stock option and the optionee is a ten percent holder, in which case the option purchase price will be the price required by the Code. The Committee will determine whether an Option is exercisable in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable Option, or portion thereof, may be exercised only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock.

Each SAR will be exercisable for no more than seven (7)years after its date of grant, except that no Tandem SAR may be exercised later than the expiration, cancellation, forfeiture or other termination of the related Option. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish performance measures which may be satisfied or met, in each case as a condition to the grant or exercisability of a SAR. Except in the case of substitute awards granted in connection with a corporate transaction, the base price of a SAR will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant, provided that the base price of a Tandem SAR will be the purchase price of the related Option. The Committee will determine whether a SAR is exercisable in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable SAR, or portion thereof, may be exercised, in the case of a Tandem SAR, only with respect to a whole number of SARs. If a SAR is exercised for shares of restricted stock, a certificate will be issued in accordance with the terms of the plan governing restricted stock awards. Prior to the exercise of a stock-settled SAR, the holder of the SAR will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to the SAR.

Additional terms relating to the exercise, cancellation or other disposition of an Option or SAR (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such Option or SAR, as the case may be, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, will be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award agreement.

Subject to the adjustment provisions set forth in the 2015 Plan, neither the Board nor the Committee may, without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, (i) reduce the purchase price or base price of any previously granted Option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for another Option or SAR with a lower purchase price or base price or (iii) cancel any previously granted Option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the purchase price of such Option or the base price of such SAR exceeds the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of such cancellation, other than in connection with a change in control or the adjustment provisions of the 2015 Plan. The holder of an Option or SAR will not be entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Option or SAR.

Stock Awards

The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of Stock Awards. The Committee may grant a Stock Award either as a restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award or unrestricted stock award.

The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an unrestricted stock award will be determined by the Committee. Unrestricted stock awards will not be subject to any restriction period or performance measures. Unrestricted stock awards will be limited so that that the Common Stock subject to all unrestricted stock awards does not exceed 5% of the total number of shares of Common Stock available under the 2015 Plan.

The Committee will determine the number of shares of Common Stock subject to a restricted stock unit award or a restricted stock award and the restriction period, performance period and performance measures applicable to such award (if any). The agreement relating to a restricted stock award or a restricted stock unit award will provide, in a manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion and subject to the provisions of the 2015 Plan, for the vesting of shares of Common Stock subject to such restricted stock award or the vesting of such restricted stock unit award, (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in the employment or service of the Company during the specified restriction period; and (ii) if specified performance measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified performance period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in the employment or service of the Company during the specified restriction period or (y) if specified performance measures are not satisfied or met during a specified performance period.

Unless otherwise set forth in a restricted stock award agreement, the holder of shares of restricted stock will have rights as a stockholder of the Company, including the voting rights, the right to receive dividends and the right to participate in any capital adjustment applicable to all holders of shares of Common Stock. However, (i) a distribution with respect to shares of Common Stock, other than a regular cash dividend, and (ii) a regular cash dividend with respect to shares of Common Stock that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, in each case, will be deposited with the Company and subject to the same restrictions as the shares of Common Stock with respect to which such distribution was made.


42

The agreement awarding restricted stock units will specify (i) whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock or cash or a combination thereof, and (ii) whether the holder will be entitled to receive on a current or deferred basis, dividend equivalents, and, if determined by the Committee, interest on, or the deemed reinvestment of, any deferred dividend equivalents. Any dividend equivalents with respect to restricted stock units that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions will be subject to the same restrictions as such restricted stock units. Prior to settlement of a restricted stock unit award, the holder of a restricted stock unit will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company.

Additional terms relating to the satisfaction of performance measures and termination of the restriction period or performance period relating to a Stock Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, will be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award agreement.

Performance Awards

The 2015 Plan also provides for the grant of performance awards. The agreement relating to a performance award will specify whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock (including restricted stock), cash or a combination thereof. The agreement relating to a performance award will provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, for the vesting of such performance award, if the specified performance measures are satisfied or met during the specified performance period, and for the forfeiture of such award if the specified performance measures are not satisfied or met during the specified performance period. Prior to the settlement of a performance award in Common Stock (including restricted stock), the holder of such award will have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to such shares. Additional terms relating to the satisfaction of performance measures and the termination of the performance period relating to a performance award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, will be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award agreement.

Performance Measures

Under the 2015 Plan, the grant, vesting, exercisability or payment of certain awards may be made subject to the satisfaction of performance measures. The performance measures applicable to a particular award will be determined by the Committee at the time of grant. In the case of an award that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exemption from the $1 million deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Code, as described below, the performance measures will be based exclusively on one or more of the following corporate-wide or subsidiary, division, business operating unit, geographic or individual objectives: the attainment by a share of Common Stock of a specified fair market value for, or at, a specified period of time; increase in stockholder value; earnings per share; net assets; return on net assets; return on equity; return on investments; return on capital or invested capital; return on sales; debt to capital ratios; total stockholder return; earnings or income of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest; earnings before interest and/or taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); EBITDA margin; operating income; revenues; operating expenses, attainment of expense levels or cost reduction goals; market segment share; cash flow, cash flow per share, cash flow margin or free cash flow; interest expense; economic value created; economic profit; gross profit or margin; operating profit or margin; net cash provided by operations; working capital and/or its components; price-to-earnings growth; revenues from new product development; percentage of revenues derived from designated lines of business and strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified goals relating to market segment penetration, customer acquisition, business expansion, cost targets, customer satisfaction, reductions in errors and omissions, reductions in lost business, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation and information technology, quality and quality audit scores, compliance, efficiency, and acquisitions or divestitures, or any combination of the foregoing. Each such performance measure may be expressed on an absolute or relative basis and may include comparisons based on current internal targets, the past performance of the Company (including the performance of one or more subsidiaries, divisions, geographic areas or business operating units) or the past or current performance of other companies (or a combination of such past and current performance).

The applicable performance measures may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be adjusted or amended in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any performance measure, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the Company or its financial statements or changes in law or accounting principles or changes in the capital structure of the Company (“Adjustment Events”). In the sole discretion of the Committee, unless such action would cause a grant to a “covered employee,” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, to fail to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may amend or adjust the performance measures or other terms and conditions of an outstanding award in recognition of any Adjustment Events. The performance measures will be subject to such other special rules and conditions as the Committee may establish; provided, however, that to the extent such goals relate to awards to “covered employees,” such special rules and conditions shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of Treasury regulation Section 1.162-27(e) or any successor regulation describing “qualified performance-based compensation.”

43


With respect to participants who are not “covered employees” and who, in the Committee’s judgment, are not likely to be “covered employees” at any time during the applicable performance period or during any period in which an award may be paid following a performance period, the performance goals established for the performance period may consist of any objective or subjective corporate-wide or subsidiary, division, business operating unit, geographic or individual measures, whether or not listed in the 2015 Plan.

Clawback of Awards

Awards granted under the 2015 Plan and any cash payment or shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to an award are subject to forfeiture, recovery by the Company or other action pursuant to the applicable award agreement or any clawback or recoupment policy as may be required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing rules and regulations thereunder, and as otherwise required by applicable law as well as such additional policies which the Company may adopt on or before the applicable award is granted.

New Plan Benefits.

The number of Options and other forms of awards that will be granted under the 2015 Plan is not currently determinable.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to awards under the 2015 Plan. This discussion does not address all aspects of the United States federal income tax consequences of participating in the 2015 Plan that may be relevant to participants in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances and does not discuss any state, local or non-United States tax consequences of participating in the 2015 Plan. Each participant is advised to consult his or her personal tax advisor concerning the application of the United States federal income tax laws to such participant’s particular situation, as well as the applicability and effect of any state, local or non-United States tax laws before taking any actions with respect to any awards.

Section 162(m) of the Code

Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits to $1 million the amount that a publicly held corporation is allowed each year to deduct for the compensation paid to the corporation’s chief executive officer and the corporation’s three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer. However, “qualified performance-based compensation” is not subject to the $1 million deduction limit. To qualify as qualified performance based-compensation, the following requirements must be satisfied: (i) the performance measures are determined by a committee consisting solely of two or more “outside directors,” (ii) the material terms under which the compensation is to be paid, including the employees eligible to receive compensation, the business criteria on which the performance goals are based and either the maximum amount of compensation that could be paid to any employee or the formula used to calculate the amount of compensation to be paid to the employee if the performance goal is attained, are approved by the corporation’s stockholders, and (iii) the committee certifies that the applicable performance measures are satisfied before payment of any qualified performance-based compensation is made. The Committee currently consists solely of “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. Certain compensation under the 2015 Plan, such as that payable with respect to Options and SARs, is not expected to be subject to the $1 million deduction limit, but other compensation payable under the 2015 Plan, such as any Stock Award that is not subject to Section 162(m) performance measures, would be subject to such limit.

Options

A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time an Option is granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over their purchase price, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. A participant will not recognize income (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax) upon exercise of an incentive stock option. If the shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option are held for at least two years from the date the Option was granted and one year from the date it was exercised, any gain or loss arising from a subsequent disposition of those shares will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss, and the Company will not be entitled to any deduction. If, however, such shares are disposed of within the above-described period, then in the year of that disposition the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the excess of the lesser of (i) the amount realized upon that disposition, and (ii) the excess of the fair market value of those shares on the date of exercise over the purchase price, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.


44

SARs

A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time SARs are granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon exercise, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Company. This amount is deductible by the Company as compensation expense.

Stock Awards

A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time restricted stock is granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time, unless the participant makes an election to be taxed at that time. If such election is made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of the grant in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value for the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. If such election is not made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time the restrictions constituting a substantial risk of forfeiture lapse in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for those shares. The amount of ordinary income recognized by making the above-described election or upon the lapse of restrictions is deductible by the Company as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply. In addition, a participant receiving dividends with respect to restricted stock for which the above-described election has not been made and prior to the time the restrictions lapse will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee), rather than dividend income, in an amount equal to the dividends paid and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time a restricted stock unit is granted and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon settlement of restricted stock units, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of any cash paid by the Company. The amount of ordinary income recognized is deductible by the Company as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

A participant will generally recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time the unrestricted stock is granted. The Company is entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time ordinary income is recognized by the participant, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

Performance Awards

A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time performance award grants are made and the Company will not be entitled to a tax deduction at that time. Upon settlement of performance awards, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) in an amount equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by the Company. This amount is deductible by the Company as compensation expense, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan.


45

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2014, with respect to the shares of our Common Stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans:

Plan CategoryNumber of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:
Outside Directors Stock Plan (1)..............................................................
125,798
Restricted Stock Plan (2)...........................................................................
773,888
Total approved by stockholders......................................................................899,686
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders:—
Grand Total.....................................................................................899,686
_______

(1)   The Outside Directors Stock Plan consists of shares registered for the purpose of issuance to our outside directors for payment of their retainer fees quarterly in advance. Director's retainer fees in 2014 consisted of $18,750 quarterly which are payable in our Common Stock. The number of shares issued each quarter is determined based on the then fair market value of the shares, which is determined in accordance with the plan at the closing price on the date one day prior to the date of distribution. Certain directors have elected to defer receipt of quarterly retainer fees under the terms of our Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 for Non-Employee Directors, resulting in an accumulation of stock unit credits. The director has the option, upon retirement or earlier termination from the Board, to have these stock unit credits distributed in the form of our Common Stock or cash. While held in the deferred compensation plan account, these stock unit credits carry no voting rights and cannot be traded as Common Stock, although declared dividends create additional stock unit credits. As of December 31, 2014, deferred retainer fees have resulted in 85,805 accumulated stock unit credits, excluding credited dividends (102,698 accumulated stock unit credits including credited dividends).

(2)   The Restricted Stock Plan is described in Note 17, Stockholders' Equity, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Shares awarded under the terms of this plan are subject to forfeiture and cannot be sold or otherwise transferred until fully vested or such restrictions are otherwise lifted. Such shares are deemed by us to be issued and outstanding and are subject to all other financial interests, including our declared dividends. As of December 31, 2014, 366,363 shares issued under this plan remained restricted.





46


PROPOSAL THREE
TWO
RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has recommended and the Board has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte & Touche”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm or outside auditor,(the “outside auditor”) for fiscal year 2015.2017. Although it is not required to do so, the Audit Committee is asking our stockholders to ratify the Board’s selection of Deloitte & Touche. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche, the Board may reconsider its selection. Even if the selection is ratified by our stockholders, the Audit Committee may in its discretion change the appointment at any time during the year, if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche will be at the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee unanimously recommend a voteFOR ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche as our independent registered public accounting firmoutside auditor for fiscal year 2015.2017.

Information Regarding the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit, Audit Related, Tax and All Other Fees

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees relating to amounts billed to the Company by its outside auditor, Deloitte & Touche, LLP, the member firmsfirm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates (collectively, “Deloitte”), for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013:2015:
  2014


 2013


Audit Fees (1)……………………….….………........
 



$1,340,131


 



$1,344,279


Audit-Related Fees (2)…………..….….…………….
 3,400 


 392,847 


Tax Fees (3)…………………………....……….….....
 18,039 


 20,221 


All Other Fees (4)………………………………………...
 40,023 


 6,000 


Total Fees…………………………………………… 



$1,401,594


 



$1,763,346


 2016 2015
    
Audit Fees(1)

$1,398,627
 
$1,392,994
Audit-Related Fees(2)
106,900
 1,295,000
Total Audit and Audit-Related Fees1,505,527
 2,687,994
Tax Compliance Services(3)
408,750
 34,060
Tax Consulting and Planning Services(4)
1,008,380
 —
Total Tax Fees1,417,130
 34,060
All Other Fees(5)
2,000
 39,922
Total Fees
$2,924,657
 
$2,761,976
______________________
(1)
Includes fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the annual financial statements, audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment thereof, review of financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services provided for statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including those associated with one of our 50% owned joint ventures in China.
(2)
Includes fees incurred for assurance and related services and consultation on regulatory matters or accounting standards.
(3)
Includes fees incurred for tax return preparation and compliance andcompliance.
(4)Includes non-audit fees incurred for tax advice and tax planning.planning which represent 53% of audit and tax compliance service fees.
(4)
(5)		Includes all other fees not included in the above categories.


47



Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

TheAll of the services listed above servicesand performed by the outside auditor were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee. These procedures describe the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other services (collectively, the “Disclosure Categories”) that the outside auditor may perform. The procedure requiresprocedures require that prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, a description of the services (the “Service List”) in each of the Disclosure Categories expected to be performed by the outside auditor in each of the Disclosure Categories in the following fiscal year be presented to the Audit Committee for approval.pre-approval.


47

Services provided by the outside auditor during the following year that are included in the Service List are pre-approved following policies and procedure ofby the Audit Committee.Committee in accordance with its pre-approval policy and procedures. Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services not contemplated on the Service List must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approvalPre-approval is providedtypically reviewed and granted at regularly scheduled meetings. However,meetings of the Audit Committee; however, the authority to grant specific pre-approval between meetings, asif necessary, has been delegated, subject to certain dollar limitations, to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. TheIn the event of specific pre-approval granted by the Chairman mustbetween meetings of the Audit Committee, the Chairman is required to update the Audit Committee at theits next regularly scheduled meeting of any services that were granted specific pre-approval.

on such grant.
In addition, although not required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee is provided a range of fees associated with each proposed service on the Service List and any services that were not originally included on the Service List. Providing a range of fees for a service incorporates appropriate oversight and control of the outside auditor when time is of the essence. The policy does not contain ade minimis provision that would provide retroactive approval for permissible non-audit services under certain circumstances.

On a periodic basis, the Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-dateto-date against the Service List and the forecast of remaining services and fees for the applicable fiscal year.




48


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report summarizes the Audit Committee’s actions during 2014.2016. This report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating this Proxy Statement by reference into any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

In accordance with its written charter, the Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors by overseeing and monitoring:
(1)the integrity of the Company’s financial statements;
(2)the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
(3)the outside auditor’s qualifications and independence; and
(4)the performance of the Company’s internal control function, its system of internal and disclosure controls, and the outside auditor.

The members of the Audit Committee meet the applicable independence and experience requirements of the SEC and the NYSE and the standards for determining a director’s independence adopted by the Board.

During 2014,2016, the Audit Committee met eightnine times.

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016 with management and Deloitte & Touche, LLP, the Company’s outside auditor. Management has the responsibilityis responsible for the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, and the outside auditor has the responsibilityis responsible for conducting an audit of thosesuch financial statements.

The Audit Committee has received from the outside auditor the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) regarding the outside auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, has discussed the independence of the outside auditor with the outside auditor and has satisfied itself as to the outside auditor’s independence.

The Committee reviewed with the outside auditor its audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks. The Audit Committee also discussed with management and the outside auditor the quality and adequacy of the Company’s internal control function and its system of internal and disclosure controls.

The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the outside auditor all communications required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC regulations and by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the outside auditor’s examination of the financial statements.

The Audit Committee discussed, reviewed and monitored the Company’s plans and activities related to Sarbanes-Oxleycompliance with Section 404 complianceof the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on a regular basis.

Based on the above-mentioned reviews and discussions with management and the outside auditor, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016 for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC. The Audit Committee also recommended the reappointment of the outside auditor, and the Board concurred with such recommendation.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

John D. Rogers (Chairman)
K.C. Caldabaugh
William A. Finn
Jeffrey J. Keenan

49


PROPOSAL THREE
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board is providing our stockholders with an advisory vote on Executive Compensation. This advisory vote, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” vote, is a non-binding vote on executive compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers as disclosed pursuant to Regulation S-K, including in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” the accompanying compensation tables and the corresponding narrative discussion and footnotes set forth on pages 14 to 25.
As described in detail in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, our executive compensation programs are generally designed to:
(i)attract, retain and motivate a skilled management team to successfully implement the Company’s near and long-term goals that are tied to the key drivers of our financial and operational performance; and
(ii)
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John D. Rogers (Chairman)
K.C. Caldabaugh
William A. Finnto align the interest of our Named Executive Officers with the interests of our stockholders.
As explained in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, we believe that these goals have been met in a manner that does not subject the Company to unreasonable risk and that reflects fair and reasonable levels of compensation, using the competitive market median as the appropriate benchmark which in turn is developed by reference to market data regarding comparable companies and executive positions that include the same companies that RiskMetrics utilizes to assess our Company for proxy vote advisory purposes.
As supported by the results achieved and summarized on pages 20 to 23, we believe that the executive team has performed well for stockholders in 2016 and that the division of the benefits of the Company’s 2016 performance has been reasonably allocated with those benefits most heavily retained for stockholders.
Accordingly, the Board recommends that our stockholders vote for the “say-on-pay” vote as set forth in the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that our stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including in the “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” the accompanying compensation tables and the corresponding narrative discussion and footnotes.
Stockholders are not ultimately voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. As this is an advisory vote, the outcome of the vote is not binding on SWM with respect to future executive compensation decisions, including those relating to its Named Executive Officers, or otherwise. The Compensation Committee and Board expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the advisory resolution relating to the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

50


PROPOSAL FOUR
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

As required under Section 14A of the Exchange Act pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board is asking SWM’s stockholders to indicate the frequency with which they believe an advisory vote on executive compensation, or a “say-on-pay” vote, should occur. Stockholders may indicate whether they prefer that we hold a “say-on-pay” vote every three years, every two years or every one year, or they may abstain from this vote.

The Board, on recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has determined that a “say-on-pay” vote every three years is the best approach for our Company and our stockholders. As described in the section titled “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program is designed to motivate executives to achieve short- and long-term corporate goals that enhance stockholder value. The Board believes that a triennial vote is appropriate in light of the Company’s compensation practices. Accordingly, the Board recommends that our stockholders vote for a frequency of every THREE YEARS when voting on the advisory vote on the frequency of a “say-on-pay” vote as set forth in the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that our stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, that the frequency with which they prefer to have a “say-on-pay” vote is:
every three years;
every two years;
every one year; or
abstain from voting
Stockholders are not ultimately voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. As this is an advisory vote, it is not binding on SWM and the Compensation Committee and Board may decide that it is in the best interest of the Company and the stockholders to hold a “say-on-pay” vote more or less frequently than the preference receiving the highest number of votes of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee and Board expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote for a frequency of every THREE YEARS as the frequency of the non-binding advisory vote regarding executive compensation for our Named Executive Officers.

51




Sustainability Disclosure

We received a stockholder resolution from the Province of St. Joseph of the Capuchin Order (the “Province”), based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. It asked that the Company adopt time-bound, quantitative, company-wide, science-based goals (SBT) for reducing total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, taking into account the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement, and report by January 1, 2018 on its plans to achieve these goals.
49Upon reception of the resolution, we had constructive communications with its proponents. We explained that, although we cannot now commit to these goals because of the significant acquisition activity taking place at the Company, we believe the Company is moving in a direction that is consistent with the goals set forth in the stockholder proposal. Our sustainability plan has an objective to reduce emissions by 10% by 2020, relative to 2015 levels. While we do not know whether this would qualify as a science-based target, the Company is interested to pursue strategic goals in GHG emissions, and recognizes the value of clear science-based GHG reduction targets.
We are committed to work with the Province and any other concerned stockholders in pursuit of the adoption of a science-based target for GHG emissions reduction, and hope to announce our intent to adopt a SBT by November 1, 2018.

OTHER INFORMATION

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 20162018 Annual Meeting

Stockholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statementproxy statement and form of proxy for the 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary at the Company’s principal executive office no later than November 13, 2015.17, 2017. All proposals for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statementproxy statement must comply with all of the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 15 and 19 of the Company’s By-Laws, stockholders must give advance notice of other business to be addressed, or nominations for director, at the 20162018 Annual Meeting not earlier than December 25, 201521, 2017 and not later than January 24, 2016.20, 2018. All proposals and nominations must comply with all of the requirements set forth in the Company’s By-Laws, a copy of which may be obtained from the Company’s General Counsel and Secretary.

Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K and Proxy Statement

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016 (including the consolidated financial statements and schedules thereto, but excluding exhibits) has been included with the mailing of this Proxy Statement to stockholders of record and beneficial holders as of February 26, 2015.23, 2017. Additional copies of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016 (excluding exhibits) will be provided without charge to each stockholder so requesting such copies in writing. The written request should be directed to the Investor Relations Department at Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., 100 North Point Center East, Suite 600, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022. In addition, the Annual Report on Form 10-K,10‑K, Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Proxy Cardform of proxy are available on the Company’s website atwww.swmintl.com.

Communicating with the Board

Stockholders and interested parties may communicate directly with the Board or any of its members, including the Lead Non-Management Director, andthe Chairman of the Audit Committee and the independent directors as a group, by telephonic or written communication as set forth below. Each communication intended for the Board or any of its members and received by the Corporate Secretary that is related to the operation of the Company will be forwarded to the designated person. The Corporate Secretary may screen communications solely for the purpose of eliminating communications that are commercial in nature andor not related to the operation of the Company and to conductconducting appropriate security clearance. All communications relating to the operation of the Company shall be forwarded to the designated recipient in their entirety.

If by phone:A voice mail message may be left identifying the individual to whom it is directed by calling (866) 528-2593. This is a toll free call and is monitored and accessible by the Corporate Secretaryoffice of the Company. Messages received on this line will be maintained in confidence to the extent practicable.

52


Corporate Secretary of the Company. Messages received on this line will be maintained in confidence to the extent practicable.
If by mail:A sealed envelope prominently marked “Confidential” on the outside of the envelope that it is directed to the attention of any director,director(s), including the Lead Non-Management Director, or the Chairman of the Audit Committee or the independent directors as a group, as appropriate, may be mailed to:

Corporate Secretary
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc.
100 North Point Center East–Suite 600
Alpharetta, Georgia 30022


YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

You are encouraged to let us know your preferences by marking the appropriate boxes on the enclosed proxy card or by voting over the Internet.




5053


Appendix A

SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2015 LONG–TERM INCENTIVE PLANswmproxycard1.jpg

Effective as of _________


SCHWEITZER-MAUDUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2015 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1Purposes. The purposes of the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (this “Plan”) are (i) to align the interests of the Company’s stockholders and the recipients of awards under this Plan by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company’s growth and success, (ii) to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants, independent contractors and agents and (iii) to motivate such persons to act in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

1.2Certain Definitions. 

“Affiliate” shall mean any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint-venture or similar entity in which the Company owns directly or indirectly, an equity interest possessing less than 50% but at least 20% of the combined voting power of the total outstanding equity interests of such entity.

“Agreement” shall mean the written or electronic agreement evidencing an award hereunder between the Company and the recipient of such award.

“Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
“Cause” shall mean, unless otherwise defined in an Agreement, the willful and continued failure to substantially perform the duties assigned by the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate (other than a failure resulting from the award recipient’s disability), the willful engaging in conduct which is demonstrably injurious to the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate (monetarily or otherwise), any act of dishonesty, the commission of a felony, the continued failure to meet performance standards, excessive absenteeism, or a significant violation of any statutory or common law duty of loyalty to the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate.

“Change in Control” shall mean (i) a third person, including a “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, consummates the acquisition of actual or beneficial ownership of shares of the Company having 30% or more of the total number of votes that may be cast for the election of directors of the Board; or (ii) as the result of the consummation of any cash tender or exchange offer, merger or other business combination, sale of assets or contested election, or any combination of the foregoing transactions (a “Transaction”), the persons who were directors of the Company before the Transaction shall cease to constitute a majority of the Board or any successor to the Company.

“Code” shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board, or a subcommittee thereof, consisting of two or more members of the Board, each of whom is intended to be (i) a “Non-Employee Director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, (ii) an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and (iii) independent” within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or, if the Common Stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange, within the meaning of the rules of the principal stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded.

“Common Stock” shall mean the common stock, par value $0.10 per share, of the Company, and all rights appurtenant thereto.

“Company” shall mean Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor thereto.

“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Fair Market Value” shall mean the closing price of a share of Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the day immediately preceding the date as of which such value is being determined or, if the Common Stock is not listed on the New York Stock Exchange as of such date, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the principal national stock

51

exchange on which the Common Stock is traded on the day immediately preceding the date as of which such value is being determined or, if there shall be no reported transactions for such date, on the last preceding date for which transactions were reported; provided, however, that if the Common Stock is not listed on a national stock exchange or if Fair Market Value for any date cannot be so determined, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee by whatever means or methods as the Committee, in the good faith exercise of its discretion, shall at such time deem appropriate and in compliance with Section 409A of the Code.

“Free-Standing SAR” shall mean an SAR which is not granted in tandem with, or by reference to, an option, which entitles the holder thereof to receive, upon exercise, shares of Common Stock (which may be Restricted Stock) or, to the extent provided in the applicable Agreement, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base price of such SAR, multiplied by the number of such SARs which are exercised.

“Good Reason” shall mean, unless otherwise defined in an Agreement, the occurrence of one or more of the following without the participant’s express written consent, which circumstances are not remedied by the Company within thirty (30) days after its receipt of a written notice from the participant describing the applicable circumstances (which notice must be provided by the participant within ninety (90) days after the participant’s knowledge of the applicable circumstances): (i) a material diminution in the Participant’s base compensation; (ii) a material diminution in the participant’s authority, duties, or responsibilities; (iii) a material change in the geographic location at which the participant must perform services; or (iv) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company of the agreement under which the participant provides services; provided, however, in the event of a termination due to “Good Reason” the participant must terminate employment within two years following the initial occurrence of the circumstance constituting good reason.

“Incentive Stock Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Common Stock that meets the requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision, which is intended by the Committee to constitute an Incentive Stock Option.

“Non-Employee Director” shall mean any director of the Company who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary.

“Nonqualified Stock Option” shall mean an option to purchase shares of Common Stock which is not an Incentive Stock Option.

“Performance Award” shall mean a right to receive an amount of cash, Common Stock, or a combination of both, contingent upon the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.

“Performance Measures” shall mean the criteria and objectives, established by the Committee, which shall be satisfied or met (i) as a condition to the grant or exercisability of all or a portion of an option or SAR or (ii) during the applicable Restriction Period or Performance Period as a condition to the grant or vesting of the holder’s interest, in the case of a Restricted Stock Award, of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award, or, in the case of a Restricted Stock Unit Award or Performance Award, to the holder’s receipt of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award or of payment with respect to such award. To the extent necessary for an award to be qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder, such criteria and objectives shall be based exclusively on one or more of the following corporate-wide or subsidiary, division, business operating unit, geographic or individual objectives: the attainment by a share of Common Stock of a specified Fair Market Value for, or at, a specified period of time; increase in stockholder value; earnings per share; net assets; return on net assets; return on equity; return on investments; return on capital or invested capital; return on sales; debt to capital ratios; total stockholder return; earnings or income of the Company before or after taxes and/or interest; earnings before interest and/or taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”); EBITDA margin; operating income; revenues; operating expenses, attainment of expense levels or cost reduction goals; market segment share; cash flow, cash flow per share, cash flow margin or free cash flow; interest expense; economic value created; economic profit; gross profit or margin; operating profit or margin; net cash provided by operations; working capital and/or its components; price-to-earnings growth; revenues from new product development; percentage of revenues derived from designated lines of business and strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified goals relating to market segment penetration, customer acquisition, business expansion, cost targets, customer satisfaction, reductions in errors and omissions, reductions in lost business, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation and information technology, quality and quality audit scores, compliance, efficiency, and acquisitions or divestitures, or any combination of the foregoing. Each such Performance Measure may be expressed on an absolute or relative basis and may include comparisons based on current internal targets, the past performance of the Company (including the performance of one or more subsidiaries, divisions, geographic areas, or business operating units) or the past or current performance of other companies (or a combination of such past and current performance). The applicable Performance Measures may be applied on a pre- or post-tax basis and may be adjusted in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code to include or exclude objectively determinable components of any Performance Measure, including, without limitation, special charges such as restructuring or impairment charges, debt refinancing costs, extraordinary or noncash items, unusual, nonrecurring or one-time events affecting the

52

Company or its financial statements, changes in law or accounting principles, or changes in the capital structure of the Company (“Adjustment Events”). In the sole discretion of the Committee, unless such action would cause a grant to a “covered employee,” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, to fail to qualify as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may amend or adjust the Performance Measures or other terms and conditions of an outstanding award in recognition of any Adjustment Events. With respect to participants who are not “covered employees” and who, in the Committee’s judgment, are not likely to be “covered employees” at any time during the applicable performance period or during any period in which an award may be paid following a Performance Period, the performance goals established for the Performance Period may consist of any objective or subjective corporate-wide or subsidiary, division, business operating unit, geographic or individual measures, whether or not listed herein. The Performance Measures shall be subject to such other special rules and conditions as the Committee may establish; provided, however, that to the extent such goals relate to awards to “covered employees,” such special rules and conditions shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of Treasury regulation Section 1.162-27(e) or any successor regulation describing “qualified performance-based compensation.”

“Performance Period” shall mean any period designated by the Committee during which (i) the Performance Measures applicable to an award shall be measured and (ii) the conditions to vesting applicable to an award shall remain in effect.

“Prior Plan” shall mean the Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan and each other plan previously maintained by the Company under which equity awards remain outstanding as of the effective date of this Plan.

“Restricted Stock” shall mean shares of Common Stock which are subject to a Restriction Period and which may, in addition thereto, be subject to the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.

“Restricted Stock Award” shall mean an award of Restricted Stock under this Plan.

“Restricted Stock Unit” shall mean a right to receive one share of Common Stock or, in lieu thereof and to the extent provided in the applicable Agreement, the Fair Market Value of such share of Common Stock in cash, which shall be contingent upon the expiration of a specified Restriction Period and which may, in addition thereto, be contingent upon the attainment of specified Performance Measures within a specified Performance Period.

“Restricted Stock Unit Award” shall mean an award of Restricted Stock Units under this Plan.

“Restriction Period” shall mean any period designated by the Committee during which (i) the Common Stock subject to an award may not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise encumbered or disposed of, except as provided in this Plan or the Agreement relating to such award, or (ii) the conditions to vesting applicable to an award shall remain in effect.

“SAR” shall mean a stock appreciation right which may be a Free-Standing SAR or a Tandem SAR.

“Stock Award” shall mean a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award or Unrestricted Stock Award.

“Subsidiary” shall mean any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture or similar entity in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, an equity interest possessing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the total outstanding equity interests of such entity.

“Substitute Award” shall mean an award granted under this Plan upon the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding equity awards previously granted by a company or other entity in connection with a corporate transaction, including a merger, combination, consolidation or acquisition of property or stock; provided, however, that in no event shall the term “Substitute Award” be construed to refer to an award made in connection with the cancellation and repricing of an option or SAR.

“Tandem SAR” shall mean an SAR which is granted in tandem with, or by reference to, an option (including a Nonqualified Stock Option granted prior to the date of grant of the SAR), which entitles the holder thereof to receive, upon exercise of such SAR and surrender for cancellation of all or a portion of such option, shares of Common Stock (which may be Restricted Stock) or, to the extent provided in the applicable Agreement, cash or a combination thereof, with an aggregate value equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the base price of such SAR, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such option, or portion thereof, which is surrendered.

“Tax Date” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.5.

“Ten Percent Holder” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(a).


53

“Unrestricted Stock” shall mean shares of Common Stock which are not subject to a Restriction Period or Performance Measures.

“Unrestricted Stock Award” shall mean an award of Unrestricted Stock under this Plan.

1.3Administration. This Plan shall be administered by the Committee. Any one or a combination of the following awards may be made under this Plan to eligible persons: (i) options to purchase shares of Common Stock in the form of Incentive Stock Options or Nonqualified Stock Options; (ii) SARs in the form of Tandem SARs or Free-Standing SARs; (iii) Stock Awards in the form of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Unrestricted Stock; and (iv) Performance Awards. The Committee shall, subject to the terms of this Plan, select eligible persons for participation in this Plan and determine the form, amount and timing of each award to such persons and, if applicable, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to an award, the number of SARs, the number of Restricted Stock Units, the dollar value subject to a Performance Award, the purchase price or base price associated with the award, the time and conditions of exercise or settlement of the award and all other terms and conditions of the award, including, without limitation, the form of the Agreement evidencing the award. The Committee may, in its sole discretion and for any reason at any time, take action such that (i) any or all outstanding options and SARs shall become exercisable in part or in full, (ii) all or a portion of the Restriction Period applicable to any outstanding Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units shall lapse, (iii) all or a portion of the Performance Period applicable to any outstanding Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or Performance Awards shall lapse and (iv) the Performance Measures (if any) applicable to any outstanding award shall be deemed to be satisfied at the target or any other level. The Committee shall, subject to the terms of this Plan, interpret this Plan and the application thereof, establish rules and regulations it deems necessary or desirable for the administration of this Plan and may impose, incidental to the grant of an award, conditions with respect to the award, such as limiting competitive employment or other activities. All such interpretations, rules, regulations and conditions shall be conclusive and binding on all parties.

The Committee may delegate some or all of its power and authority under the Plan to the Board or, subject to applicable law, to the Chief Executive Officer or such other executive officer of the Company as the Committee deems appropriate; provided, however, that (i) the Committee may not delegate its power and authority to the Board or the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company with regard to the grant of an award to any person who is a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code or who, in the Committee’s judgment, is likely to be a covered employee at any time during the period an award granted pursuant to such delegation to such employee would be outstanding and (ii) the Committee may not delegate its power and authority to the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of the Company with regard to the selection for participation in this Plan of an officer, director or other person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of an award to such an officer, director or other person.

No member of the Board or Committee, and neither the Chief Executive Officer nor any other executive officer to whom the Committee delegates any of its power and authority hereunder, shall be liable for any act, omission, interpretation, construction or determination made in connection with this Plan in good faith, and the members of the Board and the Committee and the Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement by the Company in respect of any claim, loss, damage or expense (including attorneys’ fees) arising therefrom to the full extent permitted by law (except as otherwise may be provided in the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and/or By-laws) and under any directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that may be in effect from time to time.

A majority of the Committee shall constitute a quorum. The acts of the Committee shall be either (i) acts of a majority of the members of the Committee present at any meeting at which a quorum is present or (ii) acts approved in writing by all of the members of the Committee without a meeting.

1.4Eligibility. Participants in this Plan shall consist of such officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants, independent contractors, agents and persons expected to become officers, other employees, Non-Employee Directors, consultants, independent contractors and agents of the Company and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates as the Committee in its sole discretion may select from time to time. The Committee’s selection of a person to participate in this Plan at any time shall not require the Committee to select such person to participate in this Plan at any other time. Except as provided otherwise in an Agreement, for purposes of this Plan, references to employment by the Company shall also mean employment by a Subsidiary or an Affiliate, and references to employment shall include service as a Non-Employee Director, consultant, independent contractor or agent. The Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion, the extent to which a participant shall be considered employed during any periods during which such participant is on a leave of absence.

1.5Shares Available. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5.7 and to all other limits set forth in this Section 1.5, 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock shall initially be available for all awards under this Plan and no more than 5,000,000 shares of Common Stock in the aggregate may be issued under the Plan in connection with Incentive Stock Options. To the extent the Company grants an option or a Free-Standing SAR under the Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants under the Plan shall be reduced by an amount equal to the number of shares subject to such option or Free-Standing SAR. To

54


the extent the Company grants a Stock Award or settles a Performance Award in shares of Common Stock, the number of shares of Common Stock that remain available for future grants under the Plan shall be reduced by an amount equal to 3.80 times the number of shares subject to such Stock Award or Performance Award.

To the extent that shares of Common Stock subject to an outstanding option, SAR, Stock Award or Performance Award granted under the Plan or the Prior Plan are not issued or delivered by reason of (i) the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of such award (excluding shares subject to an option cancelled upon settlement in shares of a related Tandem SAR or shares subject to a Tandem SAR cancelled upon exercise of a related option) or (ii) the settlement of such award in cash, such shares of Common Stock shall again be available for re-issuance under this Plan. In addition, shares of Common Stock subject to an award under this Plan shall not again be available for issuance under this Plan if such shares are (x) shares that were subject to an option or a SAR and were not issued or delivered upon the net settlement or net exercise of such option or SAR, (y) shares delivered to or withheld by the Company to pay the purchase price or the withholding taxes related to an outstanding award or (z) shares repurchased by the Company on the open market with the proceeds of an option exercise.swmproxycard2.jpg

The number of shares of Common Stock available for awards under this Plan shall not be reduced by (i) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to Substitute Awards or (ii) available shares under a stockholder approved plan of a company or other entity which was a party to a corporate transaction with the Company (as appropriately adjusted to reflect such corporate transaction) which become subject to awards granted under this Plan (subject to applicable stock exchange requirements).

Shares of Common Stock to be delivered under this Plan shall be made available from authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock, or authorized and issued shares of Common Stock reacquired and held as treasury shares or otherwise or a combination thereof.

1.6Per Person Limits. To the extent necessary for an award to be qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder (i) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which options or SARs, or a combination thereof, may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any person shall be 750,000, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5.7, (ii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Stock Awards subject to Performance Measures or Performance Awards denominated in Common Stock that may be earned by any person for each 12-month period during a Performance Period shall be 750,000, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5.7, and (iii) the maximum amount that may be earned by any person for each 12-month period during a Performance Period with respect to Performance Awards denominated in cash shall be $10,000,000; provided, however, that each of the per person limits set forth in this sentence shall be multiplied by two for awards granted to a participant in the year in which such participant’s employment with the Company commences. The aggregate grant date fair value of shares of Common Stock that may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any Non-Employee Director shall not exceed $500,000; provided, however, that (i) the limit set forth in this sentence shall be multiplied by two in the year in which a Non-Employee Director commences service on the Board and (ii) the limit set forth in this sentence shall not apply to awards made pursuant to an election to receive the award in lieu of all or a portion of fees received for service on the Board or any committee thereunder.

II. STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

2.1Stock Options. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant options to purchase shares of Common Stock to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee; provided, however, that a participant may be granted an option only if the underlying Common Stock qualifies, with respect to such participant, as "service recipient stock" within the meaning set forth in Section 409A of the Code. Each option, or portion thereof, that is not an Incentive Stock Option shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined as of the date of grant) of shares of Common Stock with respect to which options designated as Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by a participant during any calendar year (under this Plan or any other plan of the Company, or any parent or Subsidiary) exceeds the amount (currently $100,000) established by the Code, such options shall constitute Nonqualified Stock Options.

Options shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable:

(a)Number of Shares and Purchase Price. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an option and the purchase price per share purchasable upon exercise of the option shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the purchase price per share purchasable upon exercise of an option shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of such option; providedfurther, that if an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to any person who, at the time such option is granted, owns capital stock possessing more than 10 percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of capital stock of the Company (or of any parent or Subsidiary) (a “Ten Percent Holder”), the purchase price per share shall not be less than the price (currently 110% of Fair Market Value) required by the Code in order to constitute an Incentive Stock Option.


55

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an option that is a Substitute Award, the purchase price per share of the shares subject to such option may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant, provided, that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate purchase price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Committee) of the shares of the predecessor company or other entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate purchase price of such shares.

(b)Option Period and Exercisability. The period during which an option may be exercised shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that no option shall be exercised later than seven (7)years after its date of grant; providedfurther, that if an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to a Ten Percent Holder, such option shall not be exercised later than five years after its date of grant. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish Performance Measures which shall be satisfied or met as a condition to the grant of an option or to the exercisability of all or a portion of an option. The Committee shall determine whether an option shall become exercisable in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable option, or portion thereof, may be exercised only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock.

(c)Method of Exercise. An option may be exercised (i) by giving written notice to the Company specifying the number of whole shares of Common Stock to be purchased and accompanying such notice with payment therefor in full (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction) either (A) in cash, (B) by delivery (either actual delivery or by attestation procedures established by the Company) of shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the aggregate purchase price payable by reason of such exercise, (C) authorizing the Company to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the date of exercise, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy such obligation, (D) in cash by a broker-dealer acceptable to the Company to whom the optionee has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise or (E) a combination of (A), (B) and (C), in each case to the extent set forth in the Agreement relating to the option, (ii) if applicable, by surrendering to the Company any Tandem SARs which are cancelled by reason of the exercise of the option and (iii) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and no certificate representing shares of Common Stock shall be delivered until the full purchase price therefor and any withholding taxes thereon, as described in Section 5.5, have been paid (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction).

2.2Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant SARs to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee; provided, however, that a participant may be granted a SAR only if the underlying Common Stock qualifies, with respect to such participant, as "service recipient stock" within the meaning set forth in Section 409A of the Code. The Agreement relating to an SAR shall specify whether the SAR is a Tandem SAR or a Free-Standing SAR.

SARs shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable:

(a)Number of SARs and Base Price. The number of SARs subject to an award shall be determined by the Committee. Any Tandem SAR related to an Incentive Stock Option shall be granted at the same time that such Incentive Stock Option is granted. The base price of a Tandem SAR shall be the purchase price per share of the related option. The base price of a Free-Standing SAR shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that such base price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant of such SAR (or, if earlier, the date of grant of the option for which the SAR is exchanged or substituted).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an SAR that is a Substitute Award, the base price per share of the shares subject to such SAR may be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value per share on the date of grant, provided, that the excess of: (a) the aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date such Substitute Award is granted) of the shares subject to the Substitute Award, over (b) the aggregate base price thereof does not exceed the excess of: (x) the aggregate fair market value (as of the time immediately preceding the transaction giving rise to the Substitute Award, such fair market value to be determined by the Committee) of the shares of the predecessor company or other entity that were subject to the grant assumed or substituted for by the Company, over (y) the aggregate base price of such shares.

(b)Exercise Period and Exercisability. The period for the exercise of an SAR shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that no SAR shall be exercised later than seven(7)years after its date of grant; providedfurther, that no Tandem SAR shall be exercised later than the expiration, cancellation, forfeiture or other termination of the related option. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish Performance Measures which shall be satisfied or met as a condition to the grant of an SAR or to the exercisability of all or a portion of an SAR. The Committee shall determine whether an SAR may be exercised in cumulative or non-cumulative installments and in part or in full at any time. An exercisable SAR, or portion thereof, may be exercised, in the case of a Tandem SAR, only with respect to whole shares of Common Stock and, in the case of a Free-Standing SAR, only with respect to a

56

whole number of SARs. If an SAR is exercised for shares of Restricted Stock, a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued in accordance with Section 3.3(c), or such shares shall be transferred to the holder in book entry form with restrictions on the shares duly noted, and the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have such rights of a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant to Section 3.3(d). Prior to the exercise of a stock-settled SAR, the holder of such SAR shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such SAR.

(c)Method of Exercise. A Tandem SAR may be exercised (i) by giving written notice to the Company specifying the number of whole SARs which are being exercised, (ii) by surrendering to the Company any options which are cancelled by reason of the exercise of the Tandem SAR and (iii) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. A Free-Standing SAR may be exercised (A) by giving written notice to the Company specifying the whole number of SARs which are being exercised and (B) by executing such documents as the Company may reasonably request. No shares of Common Stock shall be issued and no certificate representing shares of Common Stock shall be delivered until any withholding taxes thereon, as described in Section 5.5, have been paid (or arrangement made for such payment to the Company’s satisfaction).

2.3Termination of Employment or Service. All of the terms relating to the exercise, cancellation or other disposition of an option or SAR (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such option or SAR, as the case may be, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award Agreement.

2.4No Repricing. The Committee shall not without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, (i) reduce the purchase price or base price of any previously granted option or SAR, (ii) cancel any previously granted option or SAR in exchange for another option or SAR with a lower purchase price or base price or (iii) cancel any previously granted option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award if the purchase price of such option or the base price of such SAR exceeds the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of such cancellation, in each case, other than in connection with a Change in Control or the adjustment provisions set forth in Section 5.7.

2.5Dividend Equivalents. Notwithstanding anything in an Agreement to the contrary, the holder of an option or SAR shall not be entitled to receive dividend equivalents with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such option or SAR.

III. STOCK AWARDS

3.1Stock Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Stock Awards to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee. The Agreement relating to a Stock Award shall specify whether the Stock Award is a Restricted Stock Award, Restricted Stock Unit Award or Unrestricted Stock Award.

3.2Terms of Unrestricted Stock Awards. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to an Unrestricted Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee. Unrestricted Stock Awards shall not be subject to any Restriction Periods or Performance Measures; provided, however, Unrestricted Stock Awards shall be limited so that the Common Stock subject to all Unrestricted Stock Awards does not exceed 5% of the total number of shares available for awards under this Plan. Upon the grant of an Unrestricted Stock Award, subject to the Company’s right to require payment of any taxes in accordance with Section 5.5, a certificate or certificates evidencing ownership of the requisite number of shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the holder of such award or such shares shall be transferred to the holder in book entry form.

3.3Terms of Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted Stock Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.
(a)Number of Shares and Other Terms. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Award and the Restriction Period, Performance Period (if any) and Performance Measures (if any) applicable to a Restricted Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee.

(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period and (ii) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period or (y) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are not satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period.


57

(c)Stock Issuance. During the Restriction Period, the shares of Restricted Stock shall be held by a custodian in book entry form with restrictions on such shares duly noted or, alternatively, a certificate or certificates representing a Restricted Stock Award shall be registered in the holder’s name and may bear a legend, in addition to any legend which may be required pursuant to Section 5.6, indicating that the ownership of the shares of Common Stock represented by such certificate is subject to the restrictions, terms and conditions of this Plan and the Agreement relating to the Restricted Stock Award. All such certificates shall be deposited with the Company, together with stock powers or other instruments of assignment (including a power of attorney), each endorsed in blank with a guarantee of signature if deemed necessary or appropriate, which would permit transfer to the Company of all or a portion of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Restricted Stock Award in the event such award is forfeited in whole or in part. Upon termination of any applicable Restriction Period (and the satisfaction or attainment of applicable Performance Measures), subject to the Company’s right to require payment of any taxes in accordance with Section 5.5, the restrictions shall be removed from the requisite number of any shares of Common Stock that are held in book entry form, and all certificates evidencing ownership of the requisite number of shares of Common Stock shall be delivered to the holder of such award.

(d)Rights with Respect to Restricted Stock Awards. Unless otherwise set forth in the Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Award, and subject to the terms and conditions of a Restricted Stock Award, the holder of such award shall have all rights as a stockholder of the Company, including, but not limited to, voting rights, the right to receive dividends and the right to participate in any capital adjustment applicable to all holders of Common Stock; provided, however, that (i) a distribution with respect to shares of Common Stock, other than a regular cash dividend, and (ii) a regular cash dividend with respect to shares of Common Stock that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, in each case, shall be deposited with the Company and shall be subject to the same restrictions as the shares of Common Stock with respect to which such distribution was made.

3.4Terms of Restricted Stock Unit Awards. Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.

(a)Number of Shares and Other Terms. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Unit Award and the Restriction Period, Performance Period (if any) and Performance Measures (if any) applicable to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be determined by the Committee.

(b)Vesting and Forfeiture. The Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of such Restricted Stock Unit Award (i) if the holder of such award remains continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period and (ii) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period, and for the forfeiture of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award (x) if the holder of such award does not remain continuously in the employment of the Company during the specified Restriction Period or (y) if specified Performance Measures (if any) are not satisfied or met during a specified Performance Period.

(c)Settlement of Vested Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Agreement relating to a Restricted Stock Unit Award shall specify (i) whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock or cash or a combination thereof and (ii) whether the holder thereof shall be entitled to receive, on a current or deferred basis, dividend equivalents, and, if determined by the Committee, interest on, or the deemed reinvestment of, any deferred dividend equivalents, with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such award. Any dividend equivalents with respect to Restricted Stock Units that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Restricted Stock Units. Prior to the settlement of a Restricted Stock Unit Award, the holder of such award shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to the shares of Common Stock subject to such award.

3.5Termination of Employment or Service. All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of Performance Measures and the termination of the Restriction Period or Performance Period relating to a Stock Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award Agreement.

IV. PERFORMANCE AWARDS

4.1Performance Awards. The Committee may, in its discretion, grant Performance Awards to such eligible persons as may be selected by the Committee.

4.2Terms of Performance Awards. Performance Awards shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of this Plan, as the Committee shall deem advisable.


58

(a)Value of Performance Awards and Performance Measures. The method of determining the value of the Performance Award and the Performance Measures and Performance Period applicable to a Performance Award shall be determined by the Committee.

(bVesting and Forfeiture. The Agreement relating to a Performance Award shall provide, in the manner determined by the Committee, in its discretion, and subject to the provisions of this Plan, for the vesting of such Performance Award if the specified Performance Measures are satisfied or met during the specified Performance Period and for the forfeiture of such award if the specified Performance Measures are not satisfied or met during the specified Performance Period.

(c)Settlement of Vested Performance Awards. The Agreement relating to a Performance Award shall specify whether such award may be settled in shares of Common Stock (including shares of Restricted Stock) or cash or a combination thereof. If a Performance Award is settled in shares of Restricted Stock, such shares of Restricted Stock shall be issued to the holder in book entry form or a certificate or certificates representing such Restricted Stock shall be issued in accordance with Section 3.3(c) and the holder of such Restricted Stock shall have such rights as a stockholder of the Company as determined pursuant to Section 3.3(d). Any dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to a Performance Award shall be subject to the same restrictions as such Performance Award. Prior to the settlement of a Performance Award in shares of Common Stock, including Restricted Stock, the holder of such award shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company.

4.3Termination of Employment or Service. All of the terms relating to the satisfaction of Performance Measures and the termination of the Performance Period relating to a Performance Award, or any forfeiture and cancellation of such award (i) upon a termination of employment with or service to the Company of the holder of such award, whether by reason of disability, retirement, death or any other reason, or (ii) during a paid or unpaid leave of absence, shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable award Agreement.

V. GENERAL

5.1Effective Date and Term of Plan.This Plan shall be submitted to the stockholders of the Company for approval at the Company’s 2015 annual meeting of stockholders and, if so approved, the Plan shall become effective as of the date on which the Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders. Once effective, this Plan shall supersede and replace the Prior Plan; provided, that the Prior Plan shall remain in effect with respect to all outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plan until such awards have been exercised, forfeited, cancelled, expired, or otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of such awards. This Plan shall terminate as of the first annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders to occur on or after the tenth anniversary of its effective date, unless terminated earlier by the Board; provided, however, that no Incentive Stock Options shall be granted after the tenth anniversary of the date on which the Plan was approved by the Board. Termination of this Plan shall not affect the terms or conditions of any award granted prior to termination. Awards hereunder may be made at any time prior to the termination of this Plan.

5.2Amendments. The Board may amend this Plan as it shall deem advisable; provided, however, that no amendment to the Plan shall be effective without the approval of the Company’s stockholders if (i) stockholder approval is required by applicable law, rule or regulation, including Section 162(m) of the Code and any rule of the New York Stock Exchange, or any other stock exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, or (ii) modify the prohibitions on the repricing or discounting of options and SARs contained in Section 2.4; provided further, that no amendment may materially impair the rights of a holder of an outstanding award without the consent of such holder.

5.3Agreement. Each award under this Plan shall be evidenced by an Agreement setting forth the terms and conditions applicable to such award. No award shall be valid until an Agreement is executed by the Company and, to the extent required by the Company, either executed by the recipient or accepted by the recipient by electronic means approved by the Company within the time period specified by the Company. Upon such execution or execution and electronic acceptance, and delivery of the Agreement to the Company, such award shall be effective as of the effective date set forth in the Agreement.

5.4Non-Transferability. No award shall be transferable other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to beneficiary designation procedures approved by the Company or, to the extent expressly permitted in the Agreement relating to such award, to the holder’s family members, a trust or entity established by the holder for estate planning purposes or a charitable organization designated by the holder, in each case, without consideration. Except to the extent permitted by the foregoing sentence or the Agreement relating to an award, each award may be exercised or settled during the holder’s lifetime only by the holder or the holder’s legal representative or similar person. Except as permitted by the second preceding sentence, no award may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated, encumbered or otherwise disposed of (whether by operation of law or otherwise) or be subject to execution, attachment or similar process. Upon any attempt to so sell, transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate, encumber or otherwise dispose of any award, such award and all rights thereunder shall immediately become null and void.


59

5.5Tax Withholding. The Company shall have the right to require, prior to the issuance or delivery of any shares of Common Stock or the payment of any cash pursuant to an award made hereunder, payment by the holder of such award of any federal, state, local, foreign or other taxes which may be required to be withheld or paid in connection with such award. An Agreement may provide that (i) the Company shall withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered to a holder, having an aggregate Fair Market Value determined as of the date the obligation to withhold or pay taxes arises in connection with an award (the “Tax Date”), or withhold an amount of cash which would otherwise be payable to a holder, in the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation or (ii) the holder may satisfy any such obligation by any of the following means: (A) a cash payment to the Company; (B) delivery (either actual delivery or by attestation procedures established by the Company) to the Company of previously owned whole shares of Common Stock having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the Tax Date, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation; (C) authorizing the Company to withhold whole shares of Common Stock which would otherwise be delivered having an aggregate Fair Market Value, determined as of the Tax Date, or withhold an amount of cash which would otherwise be payable to a holder, equal to the amount necessary to satisfy any such obligation; (D) in the case of the exercise of an option, a cash payment by a broker-dealer acceptable to the Company to whom the optionee has submitted an irrevocable notice of exercise or (E) any combination of (A), (B) and (C), in each case to the extent set forth in the Agreement relating to the award. Shares of Common Stock to be delivered or withheld may not have an aggregate Fair Market Value in excess of the amount determined by applying the minimum statutory withholding rate; provided, however, that if a fraction of a share of Common Stock would be required to satisfy the minimum statutory withholding taxes, then the number of shares of Common Stock to be delivered or withheld may be rounded up to the next nearest whole share of Common Stock.

5.6Restrictions on Shares. Each award made hereunder shall be subject to the requirement that if at any time the Company determines that the listing, registration or qualification of the shares of Common Stock subject to such award upon any securities exchange or under any law, or the consent or approval of any governmental body, or the taking of any other action is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the delivery of shares thereunder, such shares shall not be delivered unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent, approval or other action shall have been effected or obtained, free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company. The Company may require that certificates evidencing shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to any award made hereunder bear a legend indicating that the sale, transfer or other disposition thereof by the holder is prohibited except in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

5.7Adjustment. In the event of any equity restructuring (within the meaning of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation) that causes the per share value of shares of Common Stock to change, such as a stock dividend, stock split, spinoff, rights offering or recapitalization through an extraordinary cash dividend, the number and class of securities available under this Plan, the terms of each outstanding option and SAR (including the number and class of securities subject to each outstanding option or SAR and the purchase price or base price per share), the terms of each outstanding Restricted Stock Award and Restricted Stock Unit Award (including the number and class of securities subject thereto), the terms of each outstanding Performance Award (including the number and class of securities subject thereto), the maximum number of securities with respect to which options or SARs may be granted during any fiscal year of the Company to any one grantee, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be awarded during any fiscal year of the Company to any one grantee pursuant to a Stock Award that is subject to Performance Measures or a Performance Award shall be appropriately adjusted by the Committee, such adjustments to be made in the case of outstanding options and SARs without an increase in the aggregate purchase price or base price and in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. In the event of any other change in corporate capitalization, including a merger, consolidation, reorganization, or partial or complete liquidation of the Company, such equitable adjustments described in the foregoing sentence may be made as determined to be appropriate and equitable by the Committee to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights of participants. In either case, the decision of the Committee regarding any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.

5.8Change in Control. If an award holder’s employment is terminated by the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate without Cause or by the holder for Good Reason (or otherwise terminates for an eligible reason according to the terms of the Company severance policy or an employment agreement applicable to the holder as of the effective date of a Change in Control) during the period commencing on and ending twenty-four months after the effective date of the Change in Control, then effective on the holder’s date of termination of employment (i) each outstanding option and SAR held by such holder shall become fully vested and exercisable, (ii) the Restriction Period applicable to each outstanding Stock Award held by such holder shall lapse, and (iii) Performance Awards shall vest or become exercisable or payable in accordance with the applicable Agreements; ; provided, however, that awards that provide for a deferral of compensation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code shall be settled in accordance with the applicable Agreements, subject to the terms of the Plan and Section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, each option or SAR granted to such holder shall remain exercisable by the holder (or his or her legal representative or similar person) until the earlier of (y) the date that is one-year following the award holder’s termination of employment under this section (or such longer period of time as may be required by local law) or, if an award holder is subject to a severance policy or employment agreement, the end of the severance period applicable to the holder under the Company severance policy or employment agreement (if any) applicable to the holder as of the effective date of a Change in Control, or (z) the expiration date of the term of the option or SAR.

60


5.9Deferrals.The Committee may determine that the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the payment of cash, or a combination thereof, upon the exercise or settlement of all or a portion of any award (other than awards of Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options and SARs) made hereunder shall be deferred, or the Committee may, in its sole discretion, approve deferral elections made by holders of awards. Deferrals shall be for such periods and upon such terms as the Committee may determine in its sole discretion, subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

5.10No Right of Participation, Employment or Service. Unless otherwise set forth in an employment agreement, no person shall have any right to participate in this Plan. Neither this Plan nor any award made hereunder shall confer upon any person any right to continued employment by or service with the Company, any Subsidiary or any Affiliate of the Company or affect in any manner the right of the Company, any Subsidiary or any Affiliate of the Company to terminate the employment or service of any person at any time without liability hereunder.

5.11Rights as Stockholder. No person shall have any right as a stockholder of the Company with respect to any shares of Common Stock or other equity security of the Company which is subject to an award hereunder unless and until such person becomes a stockholder of record with respect to such shares of Common Stock or equity security.

5.12Designation of Beneficiary. To the extent permitted by the Company, a holder of an award may file with the Company a written designation of one or more persons as such holder’s beneficiary or beneficiaries (both primary and contingent) in the event of the holder’s death or incapacity. To the extent an outstanding option or SAR granted hereunder is exercisable, such beneficiary or beneficiaries shall be entitled to exercise such option or SAR pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Company. Each beneficiary designation shall become effective only when filed in writing with the Company during the holder’s lifetime on a form prescribed by the Company. The spouse of a married holder domiciled in a community property jurisdiction shall join in any designation of a beneficiary other than such spouse. The filing with the Company of a new beneficiary designation shall cancel all previously filed beneficiary designations. If a holder fails to designate a beneficiary, or if all designated beneficiaries of a holder predecease the holder, then each outstanding award held by such holder, to the extent vested or exercisable, shall be payable to or may be exercised by such holder’s executor, administrator, legal representative or similar person.

5.13Governing Law. This Plan, each award hereunder and the related Agreement, and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant thereto, to the extent not otherwise governed by the Code or the laws of the United States, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and construed in accordance therewith without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.

5.14Foreign Employees. Without amending this Plan, the Committee may grant awards to eligible persons who are foreign nationals and/or reside outside the U.S. on such terms and conditions different from those specified in this Plan as may in the judgment of the Committee be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of this Plan and, in furtherance of such purposes the Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures, subplans and the like as may be necessary or advisable to comply with provisions of laws in other countries or jurisdictions in which the Company or its Subsidiaries operates or has employees.

5.15    Awards Subject to Clawback. The awards granted under this Plan and any cash payment or shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to an award are subject to forfeiture, recovery by the Company or other action pursuant to the applicable Agreement or any clawback or recoupment policy as may be required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing rules and regulations thereunder, and as otherwise required by applicable law as well as such additional policies which the Company may adopt on or before the applicable law is granted.




61


62


63